Arch Capital Group
ACGL on Nasdaq. Arch Capital sells insurance, reinsurance and mortgage insurance to businesses and people worldwide. Market value $32.2bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 20 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.35.
Profit per $100 you pay: $14.50.
Quality score: 100 of 100. Price score: 91 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$94.82 a share, 15% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $82.45 to $107.09.
Dividend: 5.9% a year
Paid every year for 2 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $9.2bn | $9.6bn | $13.6bn | $17.4bn | $19.9bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.37bn | 0.37bn | 0.38bn | 0.36bn | 0.34bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 18.6% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 8% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $4.7 billion last quarter, down 10% on a year ago.
- Profit: $1.1 billion, down 15% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $6.1 billion, about the same as a year earlier.
- 8% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 2 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $4.7bn |
| December 2024 | $4.5bn |
| March 2025 | $4.7bn |
| June 2025 | $5.2bn |
| September 2025 | $5.1bn |
| December 2025 | $4.9bn |
| March 2026 | $4.5bn |
| June 2026 | $4.7bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $988m |
| December 2024 | $935m |
| March 2025 | $574m |
| June 2025 | $1.2bn |
| September 2025 | $1.4bn |
| December 2025 | $1.2bn |
| March 2026 | $1.0bn |
| June 2026 | $1.1bn |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 26 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 26 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 3 November 2026
Who owns it
10 long-term investors we follow own it, down from 11 last quarter. 906 funds in all.
- Cooke & BielerCooke & Bieler partners
- Value
- $215m
- Share of fund
- 2.5%
- Century ManagementArnold Van Den Berg
- Value
- $8m
- Share of fund
- 1.7%
- Auxier Asset ManagementJeff Auxier
- Value
- $1m
- Share of fund
- 0.2%
- First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners
- Value
- $921,099
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooke & BielerCooke & Bieler partners | $215m | 2.5% | |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $209m | 0.2% | Added |
| Brandes Investment PartnersCharles Brandes | $147m | 1.0% | Cut |
| Fiduciary Management (FMI)Pat English | $119m | 1.7% | Cut |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $15m | <0.1% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $15m | <0.1% | Added |
| Heartland AdvisorsBill Nasgovitz | $9m | 0.4% | Cut |
| Century ManagementArnold Van Den Berg | $8m | 1.7% | |
| Auxier Asset ManagementJeff Auxier | $1m | 0.2% | |
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $921,099 | <0.1% |
Sold out this quarter
- Egerton CapitalJohn ArmitageSold out
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$2.9bnCut
- Vanguard Capital Management$2.2bn
- Artisan Partners Limited Partnership$2.1bnCut
- State Street$1.6bn
- Bamco$1.5bnCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$1.4bn
- WCM Investment Management$1.2bnCut
- Banque Cantonale Vaudoise$1.2bnCut
- Geode Capital Management$1.0bn
- JPMorgan Chase$686mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
2 investors own more than 5%.
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.3%Since 31 March 2026
- Baron Capital Group, Inc.Passive investorat least 5.0%(filed with 3 related holders)Since 31 December 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
Baron Capital Group, Inc. Passive investor | at least 5.0% (filed with 3 related holders) | 31 December 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $498,677 of shares on the open market. 6 sold $29m.
- Morin FrancoisCFO and TreasurerSold
- Date
- 18 August 2026
- Shares
- 11,010
- Price
- $99.32
- Value
- $1m
- Posner Brian SDirectorSold
- Date
- 3 June 2026
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $19.66
- Value
- $58,980
- Posner Brian SDirectorSold
- Date
- 11 May 2026
- Shares
- 2,000
- Price
- $17.14
- Value
- $34,280
- Houston Daniel JosephDirectorBought
- Date
- 30 April 2026
- Shares
- 5,300
- Price
- $94.09
- Value
- $498,677
- Posner Brian SDirectorSold
- Date
- 11 March 2026
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $17.12
- Value
- $51,360
- Gansberg DavidPresident, Arch Capital GroupSold
- Date
- 10 March 2026
- Shares
- 5,907
- Price
- $96.37
- Value
- $569,258
- Papadopoulo NicolasCEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 10 March 2026
- Shares
- 21,930
- Price
- $96.31
- Value
- $2m
- Rajeh MaamounPresident, Arch Capital GroupSold
- Date
- 11 February 2026
- Shares
- 47,430
- Price
- $96.12
- Value
- $5m
- PASQUESI JOHN MDirectorSold
- Date
- 15 December 2025
- Shares
- 8,800
- Price
- $94.17
- Value
- $828,696
- PASQUESI JOHN MDirectorSold
- Date
- 12 December 2025
- Shares
- 203,866
- Price
- $93.90
- Value
- $19m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 August 2026 | Morin Francois CFO and Treasurer | Sold | 11,010 | $99.32 | $1m |
| 3 June 2026 | Posner Brian S Director | Sold | 3,000 | $19.66 | $58,980 |
| 11 May 2026 | Posner Brian S Director | Sold | 2,000 | $17.14 | $34,280 |
| 30 April 2026 | Houston Daniel Joseph Director | Bought | 5,300 | $94.09 | $498,677 |
| 11 March 2026 | Posner Brian S Director | Sold | 3,000 | $17.12 | $51,360 |
| 10 March 2026 | Gansberg David President, Arch Capital Group | Sold | 5,907 | $96.37 | $569,258 |
| 10 March 2026 | Papadopoulo Nicolas CEO, Director | Sold | 21,930 | $96.31 | $2m |
| 11 February 2026 | Rajeh Maamoun President, Arch Capital Group | Sold | 47,430 | $96.12 | $5m |
| 15 December 2025 | PASQUESI JOHN M Director | Sold | 8,800 | $94.17 | $828,696 |
| 12 December 2025 | PASQUESI JOHN M Director | Sold | 203,866 | $93.90 | $19m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 9 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our information technology systems and our pace of adoption of new technologies, including AI, may not be adequate to meet the demands of our customers or impact negatively our ability to compete with our peers.
Could happenAdditionally, the regulatory landscape surrounding traditional AI and generative AI is evolving, and the expanded use of these technologies may become subject to regulatory scrutiny under new or existing laws. Moreover, the intellectual property and ownership rights associated with both forms of artificial intelligence have not been fully addressed by courts in the U.S. or in other jurisdictions that we operate in. We established the Artificial Intelligence Governance and Oversight Committee (“AIGOC”) to evaluate and approve new AI use cases and issue and oversee our Company’s Artificial Intelligence Policy. While we believe the AIGOC and our larger AI governance framework is responsive to new risks and regulations, failure to comply with the applicable AI-related regulations could result in fines, penalties, litigation, or restrictions on our business operations. These outcomes may have a materially adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Read moreOur information technology systems and our pace of adoption of new technologies, including AI, may not be adequate to meet the demands of our customers or impact negatively our ability to compete with our peers.
Could happenWith new technologies and AI tools emerging at a rapid pace, there is no assurance that we will be able to evaluate and integrate new technologies or update our existing systems to keep pace with our competitors and customer needs. While we believe AI presents significant opportunities to support our strategic goals, we may not be successful in implementing AI technologies. It is possible that any AI we use does not perform as anticipated, suffers from “hallucinations” or that its outputs may not be as expected or may result in unlawful discrimination, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage, result in reputational damage and regulatory fines and actions.
Read moreCertain U.S. policies and actions have created geopolitical risks which are not possible to manage or predict, some of which may result in uncertainty in the global markets.
Recent U.S. policies and actions, such as actions relating to Venezuela and Greenland, may jeopardize certain global alliances and create geopolitical uncertainty. While the long-term impact of these policies is currently unknown, these policies and other geopolitical tensions have resulted in, or could result in, volatile global capital markets, sanctions, trade restrictions and harm countries’ relationships.
Read moreThe implementation of the Basel III Capital Accord and FHFA’s Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework may adversely affect the use of mortgage insurance and SRT and CRT opportunities.
Could happenWhile some countries outside of the EU have begun implementing the Basel III Endgame, both the U.K. and the EU have announced that the start of implementation will be delayed until January 1, 2027. In addition, the U.K. is considering applying different rules for smaller banks, and the EU is consulting on proposals to amend the EU Securitization Regulation (“SECR”) and Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”), which implement the Basel III Endgame. The proposed SECR and CRR amendments improve the capital relief EU banks receive from insurance-based SRT transactions in which the Company participates. The timing, requirements, and implementation of the final rules remain uncertain and subject to continued debate, which could negatively impact the capital relief afforded by the protection we provide and the volume of insurance-based SRT transactions in the EU.
Read moreThe ultimate performance of our mortgage insurance portfolios remains uncertain.
Could happenThe frequency and severity of claims we incur is uncertain and will depend largely on general economic factors outside of our control, including, among others, changes in unemployment and home prices affordability. Inflated home prices followed by a decline in home values could significantly decrease a borrower’s equity in their home, which would limit their ability to sell the property without incurring a loss and could increase the frequency and severity of claims. Changes to credit scoring models, data inputs or evaluation frameworks could result in borrowers being assessed as lower risk than their actual performance ultimately reflect, increasing uncertainty in default and claim performance due to model changes.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.