Archer-Daniels-Midland
ADM on NYSE. Archer-Daniels-Midland buys farmers' crops and sells food, feed, fuel and ingredients to businesses worldwide. Market value $39.7bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
The company doesn't report operating profit, so we work it out from pre-tax profit and interest.
Should I look at this?
Look carefully before going further
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Read the warning sign in its own filings
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $4.22 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 17.4 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 9 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 75 of 100. Price score: 71 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$82.47 a share, 48% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $55.58 to $88.75.
Dividend: 2.5% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $1.7 billion in the past 12 months, $4.2 billion in the year to December 2025.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $85.2bn | $101.6bn | $93.9bn | $85.5bn | $80.3bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 5.5% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 2.3% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.37 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.55bn | 0.53bn | 0.48bn | 0.48bn | 0.48bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)5 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.37× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 4.5% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 12% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $22.7 billion last quarter, up 7% on a year ago.
- Profit: $908 million, up 315% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $1.7 billion, down from $4.1 billion.
- About the same number of shares as a year ago.
- Debt is $7 billion more than cash, down from $8.2 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 3 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $19.9bn |
| December 2024 | $21.5bn |
| March 2025 | $20.2bn |
| June 2025 | $21.2bn |
| September 2025 | $20.4bn |
| December 2025 | $18.6bn |
| March 2026 | $20.5bn |
| June 2026 | $22.7bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $18m |
| December 2024 | $567m |
| March 2025 | $295m |
| June 2025 | $219m |
| September 2025 | $108m |
| December 2025 | $456m |
| March 2026 | $298m |
| June 2026 | $908m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 3 November 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 17 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 3 November 2026
Who owns it
10 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 10 last quarter. 1,158 funds in all.
- Markel GroupTom Gayner
- Value
- $115m
- Share of fund
- 0.9%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $18m
- Share of fund
- 0.2%
- Bruce & Co.R. Jeffrey Bruce
- Value
- $8m
- Share of fund
- 2.1%
- Cullen Capital ManagementJames Cullen
- Value
- $2m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge & CoxDodge & Cox investment committee | $1.1bn | 0.6% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $127m | 0.2% | Cut |
| Markel GroupTom Gayner | $115m | 0.9% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $35m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $18m | 0.2% | |
| Marathon Asset ManagementNeil Ostrer | $13m | 0.5% | Cut |
| Bruce & Co.R. Jeffrey Bruce | $8m | 2.1% | |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $7m | <0.1% | Added |
| Horizon KineticsMurray Stahl | $2m | <0.1% | Cut |
| Cullen Capital ManagementJames Cullen | $2m | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance$3.6bn
- BlackRock$3.4bnAdded
- State Street$2.6bn
- Vanguard Capital Management$2.4bn
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$2.1bnAdded
- Wellington Management Group LLP$1.4bnAdded
- Charles Schwab Investment Management$1.3bnAdded
- Dodge & Cox$1.1bnCut
- Geode Capital Management$1.0bnAdded
- Northern Trust$875mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.5%Since 31 March 2026
- STATE STREET CORPORATIONPassive investor7.0%Since 31 December 2024
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor5.4%Since 31 March 2026
- Wellington Management Company LLPPassive investor5.2%Since 31 March 2025
- Wellington Management Group LLPPassive investorat least 3.6%−1.6 pts(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.5% | 31 March 2026 | |
STATE STREET CORPORATION Passive investor | 7.0% | 31 December 2024 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 5.4% | 31 March 2026 | |
Wellington Management Company LLP Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 March 2025 | |
Wellington Management Group LLP Passive investor | at least 3.6%−1.6 pts (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $486,750 of shares on the open market. 4 sold $10m.
- Cuddy Christopher MSenior Vice PresidentSold
- Date
- 13 March 2026
- Shares
- 35,000
- Price
- $73.50
- Value
- $3m
- Pinner Ian RSenior Vice PresidentSold
- Date
- 13 March 2026
- Shares
- 34,106
- Price
- $71.53
- Value
- $2m
- Morris Gregory ASenior Vice PresidentSold
- Date
- 10 March 2026
- Shares
- 50,000
- Price
- $68.48
- Value
- $3m
- Weber Jennifer LSenior Vice PresidentSold
- Date
- 17 February 2026
- Shares
- 25,000
- Price
- $67.04
- Value
- $2m
- McAtee David R IIDirectorBought
- Date
- 5 February 2026
- Shares
- 7,500
- Price
- $64.90
- Value
- $486,750
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 March 2026 | Cuddy Christopher M Senior Vice President | Sold | 35,000 | $73.50 | $3m |
| 13 March 2026 | Pinner Ian R Senior Vice President | Sold | 34,106 | $71.53 | $2m |
| 10 March 2026 | Morris Gregory A Senior Vice President | Sold | 50,000 | $68.48 | $3m |
| 17 February 2026 | Weber Jennifer L Senior Vice President | Sold | 25,000 | $67.04 | $2m |
| 5 February 2026 | McAtee David R II Director | Bought | 7,500 | $64.90 | $486,750 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
1 serious warning sign in Archer-Daniels-Midland’s filings.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 17 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
Its past accounts can't be relied on
SeriousIt told the SEC its earlier accounts should no longer be relied on, usually because they contained errors.
8-K Item 4.02 filed 5 Nov 2024: the company said its earlier financial statements should no longer be relied on.
From an 8-K filed 5 November 2024: Previously issued accounts should no longer be relied on. Open the filing
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The Company is subject to various technical, legal, and opportunistic-related risks relating to use of artificial intelligence and other emerging digital technologies.
Could happenFurther, the Company’s investments in AI may not achieve expected returns, may take longer than anticipated to generate value, if at all, or may become obsolete due to rapid technological change. In addition, ADM may be adversely affected if it fails to keep pace with the adoption and effective use of AI technologies by its competitors and other industry participants.
Read moreChanges in tax laws or exposure to additional tax liabilities could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Could happenFurther, legislatures and taxing authorities in many jurisdictions in which ADM operates may enact changes to their tax rules. The U.S. One Big Beautiful Bill Act ("OBBBA"), which includes significant changes to corporate tax rules, deductions, expensing, and international tax provisions, may affect the Company’s tax position, the timing and amount of deductible expenditures, and the application of credits and incentives. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”), the European Union, and other countries (including countries in which the Company operates) have enacted substantial changes to numerous long-standing tax principles impacting how large multinational enterprises are taxed. In particular, the OECD’s Pillar Two initiative introduced a 15% global minimum tax applied on a country-by-country basis. The U.S., under the current Administration, has opposed the adoption of Pillar Two and other OECD initiatives. While the OECD has reached an agreement with the G7 to exempt U.S. multinationals from certain impacts and it introduced certain related safe harbors, the ultimate impact on the Company remains uncertain due to whether all countries immediately adopt the safe harbors and whether certain Pillar Two reporting obligations remain applicable. Each country must enact the changes to their local laws in order for the rules to go in effect. The implementation of Pillar Two will result in additional mandatory disclosures, which will likely cause additional scrutiny of the Company's tax positions and potentially increased tax assessments.
Read moreThe Company is exposed to potential business disruption risks which could adversely affect the Company’s operating results and could result in increased expenses and liabilities.
Already happenedThe Company engages in manufacturing and distribution activities across numerous markets and geographies. As a result, the Company is subject to risks inherent in such activities and from time to time has experienced unplanned downtime or extensive property damage and business disruption from various events and external factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. These events and factors include, but are not limited to, equipment failure, raw material shortages, natural disasters, adverse weather conditions, accidents, explosions, fires, environmental events, strikes or other labor or industrial disputes, war or acts of terrorism, cybersecurity attacks, or other unexpected outages. These events could result in personal injury, loss of life, and environmental damage. In some cases, the Company is dependent on a single plant or facility to manufacture or process certain products in a geographical region or otherwise. The Company may not be able to resolve disruptions timely or effectively, and the associated liability which could result from these risks may not always be covered by or could exceed liability insurance, and any insurance proceeds may not be received for several years after an event occurrence. The impact of these events and factors has and could in the future require significant investments and expenditures to repair damaged facilities or equipment and require management attention and other resources, which has and could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations.
Read moreThe Company is subject to a wide range of food safety and quality, manufacturing and labeling, occupational health and safety, environmental, and other regulatory requirements which may expose the Company to certain regulatory or reputational risks.
Could happenThe Company’s business depends on the quality and safety of the agricultural commodities, ingredients, food, feed, nutritional products, and other products it sources, manufactures, processes, stores, transports, and sells. As a result, the Company is exposed to a wide range of food quality and safety risks. ADM must comply with U.S. and non-U.S. federal, state, and local regulations on food safety, quality, manufacturing and labeling. Certain of the Company’s products may require regulatory approvals, pre‑market notifications, or ongoing compliance with evolving or uncertain regulatory frameworks in multiple jurisdictions. Further, regulatory scrutiny and standards in the food, feed, and nutrition sectors continue to evolve, such as the ongoing review by regulatory authorities in the EU and other jurisdictions of the safety and permitted uses of specified chemicals. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or changes in regulatory interpretations, standards, or enforcement priorities could restrict the Company’s ability to manufacture, market, or sell certain products, increase compliance costs, or require product reformulation or withdrawal from certain markets, and could subject ADM to substantial fines, administrative sanctions, criminal penalties, litigation, and other liabilities, as well as damage to its reputation. The Company’s liability which could result from noncompliance and other risks may not be covered by, or could exceed liability insurance related to product liability and food safety matters.
Read moreGeopolitical risks could disrupt global markets and negatively impact the Company’s business and financial results.
Already happenedThe Company has historically benefited from the free flow of agricultural and food and feed ingredient products from the U.S. and other sources to markets around the world. Increases in tariff and restrictive trade policies around the world has, and could, negatively impact the Company’s ability to enter certain markets or the price of products may become less competitive in those markets. For example, the Company’s results of operations were impacted by changes in and uncertainty relating to global trade and tariffs in 2025, and the resulting trade flow disruptions, such as U.S. soybean trade with China, as well as the deferral of U.S. biofuel policy with respect to renewable volume obligations (RVO), and the resulting uncertainty which impacted demand for soybean oil and other feedstocks.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.