American Eagle Outfitters
AEO on NYSE. American Eagle Outfitters sells clothes, underwear, and activewear to shoppers in stores and online. Market value $3.0bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to July 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to January 2026.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $11.46 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 6.5 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 14 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 84 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$17.89 a share, 27% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $14.06 to $28.46.
Dividend: 2.8% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $343 million in the past 12 months, $195 million in the year to January 2026.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $5.0bn | $5.0bn | $5.3bn | $5.3bn | $5.5bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 11.8% | 5.0% | 4.2% | 8.0% | 4.1% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.19bn | 0.20bn | 0.19bn | 0.17bn | 0.17bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)5 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.02× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 8.1% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 11% fewer since 2022
The quarter to July 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.4 billion last quarter, up 8% on a year ago.
- Profit: $134 million, up 73% on a year ago.
- It keeps 8 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 5 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $343 million, up from $152 million.
- 1% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- It has $93 million more cash than debt. A year ago debt was $76 million more than cash.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $1.3bn |
| January 2025 | $1.6bn |
| April 2025 | $1.1bn |
| July 2025 | $1.3bn |
| October 2025 | $1.4bn |
| January 2026 | $1.8bn |
| April 2026 | $1.2bn |
| July 2026 | $1.4bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $80m |
| January 2025 | $104m |
| April 2025 | -$65m |
| July 2025 | $78m |
| October 2025 | $91m |
| January 2026 | $88m |
| April 2026 | $24m |
| July 2026 | $134m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 30 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 10 December 2026
Who owns it
4 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 4 last quarter. 344 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $47m | <0.1% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $31m | <0.1% | New |
| Diamond Hill Capital ManagementRic Dillon (founder) | $3m | <0.1% | Added |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $1m | <0.1% | Added |
Sold out this quarter
- Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley teamSold out
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$459mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$202mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$176mAdded
- State Street$118mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$118m
- D. E. Shaw$114mAdded
- American Century Companies$110mCut
- Arrowstreet Capital, Limited Partnership$101mCut
- UBS Group AG$71mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$70mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor13.4%Since 30 June 2025
- Jay L. SchottensteinInsider or founderat least 7.8%(filed with 2 related holders)Since 2 March 2026
What they said
Item 4 of the Original Schedule 13D is hereby amended and restated as follows The information set forth in Item 3 of this Schedule 13D is hereby incorporated by reference. The Reporting Persons evaluate each of their investments, including the Company and the Common Stock, on an…
Read the filing - Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.3%Since 31 March 2026
- Wellington Management Group LLPPassive investorat least 3.6%(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 March 2025
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 2.6%−6.0 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 December 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 13.4% | 30 June 2025 | |
Jay L. Schottenstein Insider or founder | at least 7.8% (filed with 2 related holders) | 2 March 2026 | What they saidItem 4 of the Original Schedule 13D is hereby amended and restated as follows The information set forth in Item 3 of this Schedule 13D is hereby incorporated by reference. The Reporting Persons evaluate each of their investments, including the Company and the Common Stock, on an… Read the filing |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
Wellington Management Group LLP Passive investor | at least 3.6% (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 March 2025 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 2.6%−6.0 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 December 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 8 sold $39m.
- Spiegel Noel JosephDirectorSold
- Date
- 2 October 2026
- Shares
- 3,617
- Price
- $17.68
- Value
- $63,930
- Sable David M.DirectorSold
- Date
- 17 July 2026
- Shares
- 5,779
- Price
- $17.23
- Value
- $99,572
- MCMILLAN CARY DDirectorSold
- Date
- 7 July 2026
- Shares
- 2,892
- Price
- $16.77
- Value
- $48,513
- Spiegel Noel JosephDirectorSold
- Date
- 7 July 2026
- Shares
- 2,892
- Price
- $16.78
- Value
- $48,528
- MCMILLAN CARY DDirectorSold
- Date
- 6 April 2026
- Shares
- 2,887
- Price
- $17.23
- Value
- $49,743
- Spiegel Noel JosephDirectorSold
- Date
- 6 April 2026
- Shares
- 2,887
- Price
- $17.32
- Value
- $50,003
- SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY LExec Chairman & CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 22 January 2026
- Shares
- 21,236
- Price
- $26.23
- Value
- $557,020
- Spiegel Noel JosephDirectorSold
- Date
- 21 January 2026
- Shares
- 1,896
- Price
- $25.67
- Value
- $48,670
- SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY LExec Chairman & CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 21 January 2026
- Shares
- 527,343
- Price
- $25.83
- Value
- $14m
- SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY LExec Chairman & CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 20 January 2026
- Shares
- 500,000
- Price
- $25.27
- Value
- $13m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 October 2026 | Spiegel Noel Joseph Director | Sold | 3,617 | $17.68 | $63,930 |
| 17 July 2026 | Sable David M. Director | Sold | 5,779 | $17.23 | $99,572 |
| 7 July 2026 | MCMILLAN CARY D Director | Sold | 2,892 | $16.77 | $48,513 |
| 7 July 2026 | Spiegel Noel Joseph Director | Sold | 2,892 | $16.78 | $48,528 |
| 6 April 2026 | MCMILLAN CARY D Director | Sold | 2,887 | $17.23 | $49,743 |
| 6 April 2026 | Spiegel Noel Joseph Director | Sold | 2,887 | $17.32 | $50,003 |
| 22 January 2026 | SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY L Exec Chairman & CEO, Director | Sold | 21,236 | $26.23 | $557,020 |
| 21 January 2026 | Spiegel Noel Joseph Director | Sold | 1,896 | $25.67 | $48,670 |
| 21 January 2026 | SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY L Exec Chairman & CEO, Director | Sold | 527,343 | $25.83 | $14m |
| 20 January 2026 | SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY L Exec Chairman & CEO, Director | Sold | 500,000 | $25.27 | $13m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 30 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 10 Sep 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Failure to continue to obtain or maintain high-quality endorsers of our products, or actions taken by our endorsers, could harm our business.
Could happenFrom time to time, we establish relationships with artists, designers, musicians, athletes, social media influencers and other public figures to develop, evaluate and promote our products. If we are unable to recruit endorsers with consumer appeal or endorsers were to stop using our products contrary to their endorsement agreements, our business could be adversely affected. In addition, actions taken, allegations of wrongdoing or statements made by our endorsers, associated with our products or brand or otherwise, that harm the reputations of those endorsers or our decisions to cease collaborating with certain endorsers in light of actions taken, allegations of wrongdoing or statements made by them, could also seriously harm our brand image with consumers and, as a result, could have an adverse effect on our business.
Read moreOur product costs have been and may continue to be adversely affected by foreign trade issues, including import tariffs and other trade restrictions, increasing prices for raw materials, political instability, or other reasons, which could impact our profitability.
Already happenedIn addition, recent trade policies and uncertainty related thereto, including with respect to tariffs and other restrictions, with respect to countries from which we source our merchandise and raw materials, have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape. This has and may continue to adversely impact our business and operations. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the U.S. administration’s imposition of tariffs unlawful pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) was unlawful, striking down the 10% global baseline tariff, as well as the higher tariffs imposed on certain U.S. trading partners. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling did not affect all of the recently imposed tariffs, including those imposed following trade remedy investigations by the Department of Commerce or the U.S. Trade Representative. Nor does it prohibit the imposition of future tariffs through alternative trade authorities available to the U.S. administration. On February 20, 2026, shortly after the announced U.S. Supreme Court decision, the U.S. administration announced that it would be imposing a new 10% global tariff for a period of 150 days pursuant to a balance-of-payments provision in Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, effective February 24, 2026, which is being challenged in court by several US states. The U.S. administration further announced that it would begin additional trade remedy investigations into unidentified trading partners pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and with respect to certain unidentified product sectors pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The Court of International Trade subsequently issued an interim order requiring U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to process unliquidated entries without the unlawful tariffs and to develop a plan that could result in refunds of duties previously collected. CBP has indicated it is developing a plan within 45 days to implement that order, however the scope, timing, and ultimate availability of any refunds remains uncertain. While the Company has taken steps to preserve its rights should a refund process be established, no assurance can be given that refunds will be realized.
Read moreWe rely on third parties to drive traffic to our platform, and these providers may change their algorithms or pricing, or may be subject to new laws and regulations, in ways that could negatively affect our business, financial condition, cash flows, and results of operations.
Could happenWe continue to invest in digital marketing to drive qualified traffic to our site. Our success with these efforts depends on an ability to attract customers cost effectively and, to do so, we rely heavily on relationships with providers of online services, search engines, social media and other websites and e-commerce businesses to provide content, advertising banners and other links that direct customers to our websites. We also use social media, including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and others, as well as affiliate marketing, email, SMS, and direct mail, as part of our multi-channel approach to marketing and we expect that our use of social media for marketing purposes will increase over time. We rely on these relationships to provide significant traffic to our website and as important marketing channels and sources of information regarding potential customers. If digital platforms change or penalize us with their algorithms, terms of service, display and featuring of search results, or if competition increases for advertisements, we may be unable to cost-effectively attract customers. Our relationships with digital platforms are not covered by long-term contractual agreements and do not require any specific performance commitments. In addition, many of the platforms and agencies with whom we have advertising arrangements provide advertising services to other companies, including retailers with whom we compete.
Read moreWe may be unable to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights.
Could happenWe believe that our trademarks and service marks, as described in Part I, Item 1, Business, are important to our success and our competitive position due to their name recognition with our customers. We devote substantial resources to establishing and protecting our trademarks and service marks. We are not aware of any material claims of infringement or material challenges to our right to use any of our trademarks. Nevertheless, the actions we have taken, including to establish and protect our trademarks and service marks, may not be adequate to prevent others from imitating our products or seeking to block sales of our products. Other parties may also claim that some of our products infringe on their trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property rights. Moreover, the increased prevalence of AI raises potential issues related to unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties, as well as potential questions over the ownership of any intellectual property generated through the use of AI tools. The impact of AI on intellectual property rights may result in increased costs with respect to policing and ownership disputes. Use of AI and other machine learning technologies, by us or our service providers, in connection with the creation or development of intellectual property may present challenges in asserting ownership over the resulting output, which may not be eligible for copyright or patent protection under various laws (including those of the U.S.) without sufficient human authorship or inventorship, respectively.
Read moreNew tax legislation, including legislation implementing changes in taxation of international business activities, could be enacted at any time and new interpretations or applied laws could increase our compliance, operating and other costs. These costs, together with fluctuations in our tax obligations and effective tax rate could adversely affect us.
Could happenWe are also subject to the examination of our tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state and local taxing authorities in the United States and by taxing authorities in other jurisdictions. The laws and regulations related to tax matters are extremely complex, require significant judgment and are subject to varying interpretations and application. Although we believe our positions are reasonable, they are subject to challenge and the results of audits or related disputes could have an adverse effect on our financial statements for the period or periods for which the applicable final determinations are made. For example, we and our subsidiaries are also engaged in a number of intercompany transactions across multiple tax jurisdictions. Although we believe we have clearly reflected the economics of these transactions and the proper local transfer pricing documentation is in place, tax authorities may propose and sustain adjustments that could result in changes that may impact our mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.