Amalgamated Financial
AMAL on Nasdaq. Amalgamated Financial provides banking services to unions, businesses, and individuals. Market value $1.4bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 15 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.71.
Profit per $100 you pay: $7.96.
Quality score: 100 of 100. Price score: 82 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$47.65 a share, 90% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $25.13 to $51.59.
Dividend: 1.2% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Payouts have jumped around in recent years, so this may not repeat.
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 3% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $35 million, up 34% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $147 million, up from $122 million.
- 2% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $28m |
| December 2024 | $24m |
| March 2025 | $25m |
| June 2025 | $26m |
| September 2025 | $27m |
| December 2025 | $27m |
| March 2026 | $25m |
| June 2026 | $35m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 5 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 3 November 2026
Who owns it
3 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 2 last quarter. 196 funds in all.
- First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners
- Value
- $18m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $18m | <0.1% | |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $14m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $204,622 | <0.1% | New |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$156m
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$65m
- Nomura Asset Management International$52mCut
- Vanguard Capital Management$38m
- American Century Companies$34mAdded
- State Street$32mCut
- Alliancebernstein L.P.$31mAdded
- Adage Capital Partners GP, L.L.C.$26mCut
- Geode Capital Management$25mCut
- First Manhattan Co.$18m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- Workers UnitedPassive investorat least 23.4%(filed with 13 related holders)Since 31 December 2024
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor5.5%Since 31 January 2025
- BlackRock Portfolio Management LLCPassive investor5.4%+0.5 ptsSince 31 December 2025
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Workers United Passive investor | at least 23.4% (filed with 13 related holders) | 31 December 2024 | |
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 5.5% | 31 January 2025 | |
BlackRock Portfolio Management LLC Passive investor | 5.4%+0.5 pts | 31 December 2025 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 13 sold $5m, $4m of it under preset trading plans.
- Searby SeanEVP Chief Info. & Ops. OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 15 September 2026
- Shares
- 3,314
- Price
- $47.75
- Value
- $158,231
- Darby JasonSenior Executive VP and CFOSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 10 September 2026
- Shares
- 19,995
- Price
- $48.10
- Value
- $961,827
- Romney Edgar JrChief Strategy & Admin OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 10 September 2026
- Shares
- 5,992
- Price
- $47.46
- Value
- $284,364
- Brown Sam D.SEVP, Chief Banking OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 9 September 2026
- Shares
- 735
- Price
- $47.61
- Value
- $34,993
- Tenner MandyEVP, Chief Legal OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 8 September 2026
- Shares
- 2,920
- Price
- $48.73
- Value
- $142,298
- Brown Sam D.SEVP, Chief Banking OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 8 September 2026
- Shares
- 30,000
- Price
- $48.42
- Value
- $1m
- Darby JasonSenior Executive VP and CFOSold
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 1
- Price
- $48.20
- Value
- $66
- Brown Sam D.SEVP, Chief Banking OfficerSold
- Date
- 1 September 2026
- Shares
- 4
- Price
- n/a
- Value
- n/a
- Mark FinserDirectorSold
- Date
- 10 August 2026
- Shares
- 800
- Price
- $49.85
- Value
- $39,880
- Wells Royce A.DirectorSold
- Date
- 3 August 2026
- Shares
- 787
- Price
- $50.00
- Value
- $39,350
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 September 2026 | Searby Sean EVP Chief Info. & Ops. Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 3,314 | $47.75 | $158,231 |
| 10 September 2026 | Darby Jason Senior Executive VP and CFO | Sold under a preset trading plan | 19,995 | $48.10 | $961,827 |
| 10 September 2026 | Romney Edgar Jr Chief Strategy & Admin Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 5,992 | $47.46 | $284,364 |
| 9 September 2026 | Brown Sam D. SEVP, Chief Banking Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 735 | $47.61 | $34,993 |
| 8 September 2026 | Tenner Mandy EVP, Chief Legal Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 2,920 | $48.73 | $142,298 |
| 8 September 2026 | Brown Sam D. SEVP, Chief Banking Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 30,000 | $48.42 | $1m |
| 2 September 2026 | Darby Jason Senior Executive VP and CFO | Sold | 1 | $48.20 | $66 |
| 1 September 2026 | Brown Sam D. SEVP, Chief Banking Officer | Sold | 4 | n/a | n/a |
| 10 August 2026 | Mark Finser Director | Sold | 800 | $49.85 | $39,880 |
| 3 August 2026 | Wells Royce A. Director | Sold | 787 | $50.00 | $39,350 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 5 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 6 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The banking industry is heavily regulated and that regulation, together with any future legislation or regulatory changes, could limit or restrict our activities and adversely affect our operations or financial results.
Could happenThe current presidential administration is implementing a regulatory reform agenda that is significantly different from that of the prior administration, impacting the rule making, supervision, examination and enforcement of the banking regulation agencies and our ability to respond to those changes. The 2025 GENIUS Act and related federal mandates, as well as NYDFS rulemaking, to curb “debanking” limits our ability to manage credit and reputational risk, potentially resulting in increased compliance costs to justify account closures, heightened exposure to fraud and AML losses resulting from our limited ability to terminate relationships with customers in high-risk sectors, and adverse impacts on our operational efficiency because of the 30-day mandatory notice period for most account closures. Furthermore, these anti-debanking measures may expose us to customer-led litigation alleging violation of fair access standards. For a more detailed description of anti-debanking measures, see “Fair Lending Requirements.”
Read moreChanges in U.S. trade policies and other global political factors beyond our control, including the imposition of tariffs, retaliatory tariffs, or other sanctions, may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Could happenThere have been, and may be in the future, changes with respect to U.S. and international trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade restrictions. In response to a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling that the President does not have authority to impose sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the President signed an executive order imposing additional global tariffs. It remains unclear whether and how federal agencies will enforce conflicting mandates on tariffs, and whether parties harmed by tariffs will have recourse against the federal government. Tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials that customers import or export, or a trade war or other related governmental actions related to tariffs, international trade agreements or policies or other trade restrictions continue to have the potential to negatively impact our customers' costs, demand for their products, or the U.S. economy or certain sectors thereof and, thus, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreWe are exposed to litigation and compliance risks related to our Socially Responsible Banking business model.
Could happenWe may become the target of public criticism, litigation and regulatory and enforcement actions because of our ESG products and our social responsibility mission. For example, anti-debanking regulations promulgated under the GENIUS Act and at the NYDFS target financial institutions that will not lend or have made statements about not lending to certain industries. The potential impact of anti-debanking regulations on our business is discussed under the risk factor, “ The banking industry is heavily regulated and that regulation, together with any future legislation or regulatory changes, could limit or restrict our activities and adversely affect our operations or financial results.”
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.