Abercrombie & Fitch
ANF on NYSE. Abercrombie & Fitch sells clothes and accessories to teenagers and young adults. Market value $6.0bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to July 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to January 2026.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $9.44 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
The filings do not give us enough to work this out.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 96 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 81 of 100. Price score: 83 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$141.39 a share, 116% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $65.45 to $155.22.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $566 million in the past 12 months, $378 million in the year to January 2026.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $3.7bn | $3.7bn | $4.3bn | $4.9bn | $5.3bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 9.2% | 2.5% | 11.3% | 15.0% | 13.3% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.00 | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.05bn | 0.05bn | 0.05bn | 0.05bn | 0.04bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive4 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)5 of 7 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- DebtUnknown
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 11.0% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 13% fewer since 2022
The quarter to July 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.3 billion last quarter, up 5% on a year ago.
- Profit: $184 million, up 30% on a year ago.
- It keeps 14 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 15 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $566 million, up from $345 million.
- 9% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $1.2bn |
| January 2025 | $1.6bn |
| April 2025 | $1.1bn |
| July 2025 | $1.2bn |
| October 2025 | $1.3bn |
| January 2026 | $1.7bn |
| April 2026 | $1.1bn |
| July 2026 | $1.3bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $132m |
| January 2025 | $187m |
| April 2025 | $80m |
| July 2025 | $141m |
| October 2025 | $113m |
| January 2026 | $172m |
| April 2026 | $67m |
| July 2026 | $184m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 26 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 4 December 2026
Who owns it
6 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 5 last quarter. 413 funds in all.
- Delphi ManagementScott Black
- Value
- $338,000
- Share of fund
- 0.3%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $14m | 0.1% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $8m | <0.1% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $2m | <0.1% | Added |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $2m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $2m | <0.1% | New |
| Delphi ManagementScott Black | $338,000 | 0.3% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$546m
- FMR$327mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$221m
- AQR Capital Management$213mCut
- American Century Companies$182mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$181m
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$165mAdded
- State Street$164mAdded
- Bbfit Investments PTE$147m
- Arrowstreet Capital, Limited Partnership$124mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor12.1%Since 31 March 2025
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 8.2%+5.2 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor5.5%Since 31 March 2026
- AQR Capital Management, LLCPassive investorat least 5.5%−2.2 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 12.1% | 31 March 2025 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 8.2%+5.2 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 5.5% | 31 March 2026 | |
AQR Capital Management, LLC Passive investor | at least 5.5%−2.2 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 5 sold $50m, $39m of it under preset trading plans.
- Lipesky Scott D.EVP and COOSold
- Date
- 4 September 2026
- Shares
- 2,000
- Price
- $146.82
- Value
- $293,640
- Rust JayEVP, Chief HR OfficerSold
- Date
- 28 August 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $147.50
- Value
- $737,500
- Robinson Kenneth B.DirectorSold
- Date
- 28 August 2026
- Shares
- 800
- Price
- $149.69
- Value
- $119,752
- Lipesky Scott D.EVP and COOSold
- Date
- 28 August 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $149.00
- Value
- $745,000
- HENCHEL GREGORY JEVP, Chief Legal Off & SecySold
- Date
- 28 August 2026
- Shares
- 30,000
- Price
- $146.65
- Value
- $4m
- Lipesky Scott D.EVP and COOSold
- Date
- 10 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $115.00
- Value
- $1m
- Lipesky Scott D.EVP and COOSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 4 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $110.00
- Value
- $1m
- Lipesky Scott D.EVP and COOSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 28 July 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $105.00
- Value
- $1m
- Lipesky Scott D.EVP and COOSold
- Date
- 16 July 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $100.00
- Value
- $1m
- Horowitz FranChief Executive Officer, DirectorSold
- Date
- 6 February 2026
- Shares
- 29,769
- Price
- $100.00
- Value
- $3m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 September 2026 | Lipesky Scott D. EVP and COO | Sold | 2,000 | $146.82 | $293,640 |
| 28 August 2026 | Rust Jay EVP, Chief HR Officer | Sold | 5,000 | $147.50 | $737,500 |
| 28 August 2026 | Robinson Kenneth B. Director | Sold | 800 | $149.69 | $119,752 |
| 28 August 2026 | Lipesky Scott D. EVP and COO | Sold | 5,000 | $149.00 | $745,000 |
| 28 August 2026 | HENCHEL GREGORY J EVP, Chief Legal Off & Secy | Sold | 30,000 | $146.65 | $4m |
| 10 August 2026 | Lipesky Scott D. EVP and COO | Sold | 10,000 | $115.00 | $1m |
| 4 August 2026 | Lipesky Scott D. EVP and COO | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $110.00 | $1m |
| 28 July 2026 | Lipesky Scott D. EVP and COO | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $105.00 | $1m |
| 16 July 2026 | Lipesky Scott D. EVP and COO | Sold | 10,000 | $100.00 | $1m |
| 6 February 2026 | Horowitz Fran Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 29,769 | $100.00 | $3m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 26 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Sep 2026 and 4 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Changes in tariff policy regarding merchandise produced in, and raw materials sourced from, certain countries have and could continue to adversely affect our business.
Already happenedRecent trade policies and related uncertainty, including tariffs imposed on countries from which we source a significant portion of our merchandise and raw materials, have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape that has adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, our business. For example, in 2025, the U.S. imposed, modified, and rescinded certain tariffs, including those pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that IEEPA did not authorize the imposition of such tariffs, and subsequently the U.S. administration continued to impose, modify, and propose new tariffs pursuant to various statutes and trade authorities, including the imposition of a 10% global tariff pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. While certain tariffs have been struck down, modified, or replaced, other tariffs remain in effect, and additional tariff programs may be imposed in the future through various statutes and trade authorities. In addition, there can be no assurance that any duties paid under tariffs that are subsequently struck down, including those imposed pursuant to the IEEPA, will be refunded in whole or in part, or that any such refunds would be received on a timely basis, if at all.
Read moreUse of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to operational, technological, and business risks that could adversely affect our business.
Could happenThe use of AI and other machine learning technologies, by us or our service providers, in connection with the creation or development of intellectual property may present challenges in asserting ownership over the resulting output. Further, the use of such technologies may increase the risk that confidential information becomes accessible by third parties or results in legal or regulatory exposure. We also rely on third-party service providers that may use AI in their business activities, and failures by one or more of such service providers to meet our expectations may have an adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.
Read moreOur failure to operate effectively in a highly competitive and constantly evolving industry could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Could happen• Effectively identifying, evaluating, and competing on new and emerging digital selling platforms and commerce models, including social commerce platforms and AI‑enabled or agentic shopping experiences;
Use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to operational, technological, and business risks that could adversely affect our business.
Could happenThe use of rapidly evolving technologies, such as AI technologies, by us and our third-party service providers presents risks and challenges to our business. Using AI and other machine learning technologies may expose us to unintended outcomes, liability, reputational harm, particularly if such technology produces errors or hallucinations, results in content that is biased, infringes on intellectual property, or otherwise does not function as intended. Moreover, with the use of certain AI and other machine learning technologies, including those licensed from third parties, there may be a lack of transparency regarding how such technologies generate outputs, and we may not be able to fully validate their accuracy or reliability. To the extent that we rely on AI‑enabled tools to support operational processes or decision‑making, limitations in model performance, data quality, or human oversight could adversely affect our operations, customer experience, or financial performance.
Read moreOur inability to effectively conduct business in international markets, including as a result of operational, legal, tax, regulatory, political, and economic risks could have a material adverse impact on our business.
• managing foreign currency exchange rate risks effectively; and • the substantial investments of time and resources we make to operate in international markets may not achieve acceptable returns, and sustained declines in revenue or profitability in one or more international regions or operating segments could result in store closures, divestitures, restructuring costs, or impairment losses, all of which could adversely impact our business, profitability, and results of operations; for example, in March 2026, we announced that we are conducting a review of strategic alternatives for our APAC region.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.