Booking Holdings
BKNG on Nasdaq. Booking Holdings sells travel and restaurant booking services to travelers and travel providers. Market value $119.0bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing big in our quick check. See what could go wrong below.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $8.02 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 13.1 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
The filings do not give us enough to work this out.
Quality score: 70 of 100. Price score: 97 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$158.33 a share, 5% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $150.14 to $225.00.
Dividend: 1.0% a year
Paid every year for 2 years
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $11.0bn | $17.1bn | $21.4bn | $23.7bn | $26.9bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 22.8% | 29.9% | 27.3% | 31.8% | 32.8% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.77 | 4.51 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.04bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.75bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 7 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)No
- DebtUnknown
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 31.7% a year
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 1837% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $7.4 billion last quarter, up 8% on a year ago.
- Profit: $1.9 billion, up 118% on a year ago.
- It keeps 33 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, about the same as a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $9.5 billion, up from $9.2 billion.
- 6% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $3 billion more than cash, up from $877 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $8.0bn |
| December 2024 | $5.5bn |
| March 2025 | $4.8bn |
| June 2025 | $6.8bn |
| September 2025 | $9.0bn |
| December 2025 | $6.3bn |
| March 2026 | $5.5bn |
| June 2026 | $7.4bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $2.5bn |
| December 2024 | $1.1bn |
| March 2025 | $333m |
| June 2025 | $895m |
| September 2025 | $2.7bn |
| December 2025 | $1.4bn |
| March 2026 | $1.1bn |
| June 2026 | $1.9bn |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 27 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 18 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 3 November 2026
Who owns it
26 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 23 last quarter. 1,922 funds in all.
- Sanders CapitalLew Sanders
- Value
- $1.3bn
- Share of fund
- 1.3%
- Giverny CapitalFrançois Rochon
- Value
- $93m
- Share of fund
- 3.1%
- Fenimore Asset Management (FAM Funds)John Fox
- Value
- $90m
- Share of fund
- 1.9%
- Auxier Asset ManagementJeff Auxier
- Value
- $9m
- Share of fund
- 1.3%
- Platinum Investment ManagementPlatinum team
- Value
- $2m
- Share of fund
- 0.5%
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$11.6bn
- Vanguard Capital Management$9.0bnCut
- Alliancebernstein L.P.$7.8bnAdded
- State Street$6.2bn
- Price T Rowe Associates$4.7bnCut
- Invesco$4.6bn
- Dodge & Cox$4.6bnAdded
- Geode Capital Management$3.9bn
- Capital World Investors$3.7bnAdded
- JPMorgan Chase$3.4bnCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.6%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.6% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 6 sold $61m, $60m of it under preset trading plans.
- Pisano PauloCHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICERSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 15 September 2026
- Shares
- 1,500
- Price
- $173.02
- Value
- $259,530
- MYLOD ROBERT J JRDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 1 September 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $200.00
- Value
- $200,000
- Pisano PauloCHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICERSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 31 August 2026
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $203.48
- Value
- $610,440
- WITTMAN VANESSA AMESDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 17 August 2026
- Shares
- 375
- Price
- $211.00
- Value
- $79,125
- MILLONES PETER JEXECUTIVE VP, GENERAL COUNSELSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 17 August 2026
- Shares
- 50,050
- Price
- $207.59
- Value
- $10m
- Steenbergen Ewout LCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 12 August 2026
- Shares
- 20,000
- Price
- $211.03
- Value
- $4m
- MYLOD ROBERT J JRDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 5 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $206.70
- Value
- $206,700
- MYLOD ROBERT J JRDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 29 July 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $200.00
- Value
- $1m
- WITTMAN VANESSA AMESDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 28 July 2026
- Shares
- 1,125
- Price
- $192.00
- Value
- $216,000
- MILLONES PETER JEXECUTIVE VP, GENERAL COUNSELSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 26 May 2026
- Shares
- 62,500
- Price
- $163.67
- Value
- $10m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 September 2026 | Pisano Paulo CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER | Sold under a preset trading plan | 1,500 | $173.02 | $259,530 |
| 1 September 2026 | MYLOD ROBERT J JR Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 1,000 | $200.00 | $200,000 |
| 31 August 2026 | Pisano Paulo CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER | Sold under a preset trading plan | 3,000 | $203.48 | $610,440 |
| 17 August 2026 | WITTMAN VANESSA AMES Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 375 | $211.00 | $79,125 |
| 17 August 2026 | MILLONES PETER J EXECUTIVE VP, GENERAL COUNSEL | Sold under a preset trading plan | 50,050 | $207.59 | $10m |
| 12 August 2026 | Steenbergen Ewout L CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | Sold under a preset trading plan | 20,000 | $211.03 | $4m |
| 5 August 2026 | MYLOD ROBERT J JR Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 1,000 | $206.70 | $206,700 |
| 29 July 2026 | MYLOD ROBERT J JR Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 5,000 | $200.00 | $1m |
| 28 July 2026 | WITTMAN VANESSA AMES Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 1,125 | $192.00 | $216,000 |
| 26 May 2026 | MILLONES PETER J EXECUTIVE VP, GENERAL COUNSEL | Sold under a preset trading plan | 62,500 | $163.67 | $10m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 18 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 8 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
- It owes more than it owns on paper (negative equity). Often that's from borrowing to buy back shares.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
We rely on the performance of highly skilled employees and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key employees or hire, retain, and motivate well-qualified employees, our business would be harmed.
Already happenedCompetition for well-qualified employees, especially software engineers, professionals supporting our Gen AI initiatives, and other technology professionals, is intense and costly. Our customer service resources (including outsource arrangements) may be unable to provide adequate customer service support. Additionally, our Gen AI initiatives could alter our infrastructure and workforce. Our success has led to increased efforts by our competitors and others to hire our employees. These difficulties may be amplified by increased ability to work remotely, evolving restrictions on immigration or availability of visas or work permits for skilled technology workers, requirements of applicable collective bargaining agreements, and laws in certain jurisdictions that make recruiting senior talent more difficult, such as the reductions in the partial tax exemption that benefits certain non-Dutch citizens working in the Netherlands. These factors combined with inflationary pressure on compensation has caused our personnel expenses to attract and retain key talent to increase, which may adversely affect our results of operations. If we do not succeed in attracting, and retaining well-qualified employees, our business, ability to grow and innovate, competitive position, reputation, and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Read moreWe are dependent on travel service providers, restaurants, search platforms, and other third parties.
Could happenA significant portion of consumer traffic to our services is derived from third-party platforms, including Google and other search engines, mobile operating systems, app marketplaces, mapping services, and other digital distribution channels. These platforms increasingly incorporate Gen AI features, such as AI-generated answers, assistants, and recommendations, that may satisfy user intent without directing users to our services or may favor the platform's own or affiliated offerings.
Read moreOur business is subject to various competition, consumer protection, and online commerce laws and regulations around the world, and as the size of our business grows, scrutiny of our business in these areas may intensify.
Competition and consumer-law-related investigations, legislation, judgments, or issues have in the past resulted in and could in the future result in private litigation. We are currently involved in such litigation and aware of such potential litigation. For example, a Dutch consumer group has filed a claim against Booking.com relating to the historical use of contractual parity provisions, as well as allegations that Booking.com and Agoda employed misleading practices, and we are aware of similar efforts to pursue potential claims in other jurisdictions. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding this and other such claims or potential claims. Class action litigation can be time-consuming, costly, and unpredictable, regardless of merit, and there may be evolving jurisprudence and less experience with such matters in certain of the geographies where we are or may be involved in such litigation, making outcomes less certain and harder to forecast. If we were to be found liable, it could result in, among other things, payment of damages, commitments to change certain business practices, or reputational damage, any of which could harm our business, results of operations, brands, or competitive position.
Read moreIntense competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial performance.
Could happenWe operate in highly competitive and rapidly evolving global markets for travel and restaurant reservation services. Barriers to entry are low, and we compete with online travel companies ("OTCs"), travel service providers offering direct booking (such as airlines, hotels, and rental car companies), traditional travel agencies and operators, companies offering travel-related software, payments, or technology solutions, financial services and credit card companies, and global technology companies with significantly greater scale, data, and financial resources. For example, Google links travel search to its dominant search engine and has integrated travel products into Google Maps and its Gemini generative AI ("Gen AI") offering. Other large technology platforms and AI-native competitors are developing Gen AI-powered assistants and agents that can search, compare, recommend, and facilitate travel and dining reservations directly within their search engines, operating systems, messaging platforms, or "super-apps." These offerings may reduce consumers choosing to visit dedicated online travel platforms, reducing direct traffic, bookings, and customer relationships. Gen AI also lowers barriers to entry and enables competitors to potentially replicate or improve core functionality, personalize recommendations and pricing, and acquire customers more efficiently through non-travel consumer interactions. AI agents may further evolve into full-service booking platforms, increasing competitive pressure and disintermediating OTCs. If our Gen AI investments are not successful or we are unable to successfully adapt to such changes, our ability to compete, and our business and results of operations, could be adversely affected.
Read moreWe are dependent on travel service providers, restaurants, search platforms, and other third parties.
Could happenChanges in algorithms, ranking methodologies, user interfaces, access terms, pricing, or the placement of AI-generated content by these platforms could reduce the visibility of our services, increase customer acquisition costs, or decrease traffic and bookings. In addition, platform providers may restrict data access, limit interoperability, or impose commercial terms that disadvantage us relative to competing or native AI-enabled services.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.