Colony Bankcorp
CBAN on NYSE. Colony Bankcorp sells banking services to retail and commercial customers in the Southeast. Market value $433m.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 9 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.11.
Profit per $100 you pay: $2.56.
Quality score: 86 of 100. Price score: 63 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$20.43 a share, 29% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $15.80 to $22.46.
Dividend: 1.9% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.02bn | 0.02bn | 0.02bn | 0.02bn | 0.02bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 20% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $11 million, up 36% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $22 million, down from $50 million.
- 21% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $6m |
| December 2024 | $7m |
| March 2025 | $7m |
| June 2025 | $8m |
| September 2025 | $6m |
| December 2025 | -$14m |
| March 2026 | $8m |
| June 2026 | $11m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 13 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 4 November 2026
Who owns it
2 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 2 last quarter. 149 funds in all.
- LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok
- Value
- $368,000
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $257,152
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $368,000 | <0.1% | |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $257,152 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$47mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$18mCut
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$18mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$11mAdded
- American Century Companies$9mAdded
- Petiole USA$9m
- Banc Funds$9mAdded
- State Street$9mAdded
- TWO Sigma Investments, LP$7mAdded
- Pacific Ridge Capital Partners$6m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor6.6%+1.6 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 December 2025
- Fourthstone LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 6.6%+1.6 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 December 2025 | |
Fourthstone LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 3 insiders bought $307,414 of shares on the open market.
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 26 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $21.20
- Value
- $21,200
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 20 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $21.25
- Value
- $21,250
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 19 August 2026
- Shares
- 2,000
- Price
- $21.63
- Value
- $43,250
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 18 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $22.00
- Value
- $22,000
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 30 July 2026
- Shares
- 2,000
- Price
- $21.80
- Value
- $43,600
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 5 May 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $19.65
- Value
- $19,650
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 27 April 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $19.80
- Value
- $19,800
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 24 April 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $19.97
- Value
- $19,970
- Canup Edward GCHIEF BANKING OFFICERBought
- Date
- 6 March 2026
- Shares
- 500
- Price
- $19.25
- Value
- $9,625
- Shelnutt DerekCFOBought
- Date
- 3 March 2026
- Shares
- 250
- Price
- $19.50
- Value
- $4,875
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 August 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 1,000 | $21.20 | $21,200 |
| 20 August 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 1,000 | $21.25 | $21,250 |
| 19 August 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 2,000 | $21.63 | $43,250 |
| 18 August 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 1,000 | $22.00 | $22,000 |
| 30 July 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 2,000 | $21.80 | $43,600 |
| 5 May 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 1,000 | $19.65 | $19,650 |
| 27 April 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 1,000 | $19.80 | $19,800 |
| 24 April 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 1,000 | $19.97 | $19,970 |
| 6 March 2026 | Canup Edward G CHIEF BANKING OFFICER | Bought | 500 | $19.25 | $9,625 |
| 3 March 2026 | Shelnutt Derek CFO | Bought | 250 | $19.50 | $4,875 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 13 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 5 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
We face strong competition from financial service companies and other companies that offer commercial and retail banking services, which could harm our business.
Could happenMany of our competitors offer the same, or a wider variety of, the banking and related financial services we offer within our market areas. These competitors include national banks, regional banks and other community banks, including banks similar to us that primarily serve distinct or multi-ethnic communities. In many instances these national and regional banks have greater resources than we do, and the smaller community banks may have stronger ties in local markets than we do, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including fintech companies, savings associations, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, mortgage banks and other financial intermediaries. Further, our credit union competitors benefit from competitive advantages, including the credit union exemption from paying federal income tax and can, therefore, more aggressively price many products and services. In addition, a number of out-of-state financial intermediaries have opened production offices or otherwise solicit deposits in our market areas. We also compete with many forms of payments offered by both bank and non-bank providers, including a variety of new and evolving alternative payment mechanisms, systems and products, such as aggregators and web-based and wireless payment platforms or technologies, digital or “crypto” currencies, prepaid systems and payment services targeting users of social networks, communications platforms and online gaming. Competition is increasingly focused on digital capabilities, customer experience, speed, and convenience, and failure to meet evolving customer expectations may adversely affect our competitive position. Some competitors may be willing to accept lower returns, assume greater risk, or offer more favorable pricing and terms than we are willing or able to provide, which could place downward pressure on our margins. In addition, some competitors may offer banking and payment services through embedded or platform-based models that reduce the need for customers to maintain traditional banking relationships. Our future success may depend, in part, on our ability to use technology competitively to offer products and services that provide convenience to customers and create additional efficiencies in our operations. If we are unable to match the pace of technological change or the level of investment made by larger or more technologically advanced competitors, we may experience customer attrition or reduced growth opportunities. Further, as a result of the GENIUS Act, passed in 2025 to provide a regulatory framework for stablecoins in the U.S., increased competition may emerge from issuers of stablecoins and providers of related technology.
Read moreOur business depends on our ability to successfully manage our asset quality and credit risk.
Could happenWe are subject to the risk of losses resulting from the failure of borrowers, guarantors and related parties to pay us the interest and principal amounts due on their loans. Although we maintain well-defined credit policies and credit underwriting and monitoring and collection procedures, these policies and procedures may not prevent losses, as some of these risks are outside of our control, particularly during periods in which the local, regional or national economy suffers a general decline. Our credit risk may be heightened by concentrations in certain loan types, industries, geographic areas or borrower profiles, which could result in correlated losses during adverse economic conditions. Our access to funding sources could also be affected by a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in our primary market area or by one or more adverse regulatory actions against us. Deterioration in credit quality may not be immediately apparent, and losses may emerge over time as economic conditions worsen or collateral values decline. Further, in the event of delinquencies, regulatory changes and policies designed to protect borrowers may slow or prevent us from making our business decisions or may result in a delay in our taking certain remediation actions, such as foreclosure. Our assessment of credit risk relies on management judgment, forecasts and assumptions, which may prove inaccurate, particularly during periods of economic stress or rapid market change. If borrowers fail to repay their loans, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected . Additionally, potential future actions such as the proposed consumer credit card interest rate cap may lead to unprofitable products, especially for riskier borrowers, and could lead to cutting credit lines or eliminating cards, increased reliance on fees and increased debt burdens for those needing credit the most, thereby having the potential to negatively impact bank asset quality.
Read moreOur future success is largely dependent upon our ability to successfully execute our business strategy.
Could happenFailure to achieve these objectives could impair our ability to execute our strategy and adversely affect our business, growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, ineffective growth management, technology implementation challenges, cost overruns or service disruptions involving third‐party providers could hinder our ability to achieve our strategic objectives. Pursuing multiple strategic initiatives simultaneously, including acquisitions, technology investments or geographic expansion, may place additional strain on management, personnel, systems and controls. Our ability to execute our strategic objectives depends, in part, on the successful integration of TC Bancshares, Inc. The integration process will require significant management attention and resources and may divert focus from other initiatives. We may encounter challenges integrating systems, processes, controls, personnel and cultures, and there can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits or efficiencies of the transaction will be realized on the expected timeline or at all. Failure to successfully integrate the businesses could adversely affect our growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreNegative developments in the banking industry could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.
Bank failures and related negative media attention may generate significant market trading volatility among publicly traded bank holding companies and, in particular, regional banks like the Company. These developments have and may continue to negatively impact customer confidence in regional banks, which could prompt customers to maintain their deposits with larger financial institutions or otherwise relocate funds. Rapid changes in customer behavior, including accelerated deposit withdrawals facilitated by digital banking channels, could increase liquidity pressures. If we were required to sell a portion of our securities portfolio to address liquidity needs, we may incur losses, including as a result of the negative impact of rising interest rates on the value of our securities portfolio, which could negatively affect our earnings and our capital. While we have taken actions to improve our funding, there is no guarantee that such actions will be successful or sufficient in the event of sudden liquidity needs.
Read moreThe Federal Reserve may require us to commit capital resources to support the Bank.
Could happenThe Federal Reserve, which examines us and the Bank, requires a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to a subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the “source of strength” doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to such a subsidiary bank. In addition, The Bank is subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital which the Bank must maintain. From time to time, the regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If the Bank fails to meet these minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our financial condition would be materially and adversely affected. We may also be required to satisfy additional capital adequacy standards as determined by the Federal Reserve. These requirements, and any other new regulations, could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends, service holding‐company obligations, pursue growth initiatives or return capital to shareholders, and could require us to raise additional capital or reallocate resources in ways that may not be favorable to our shareholders, including at times when market conditions are adverse.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.