Cullen/frost Bankers
CFR on NYSE. Cullen/Frost Bankers sells banking services to people and businesses. Market value $9.6bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 15 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $2.07.
Profit per $100 you pay: $7.15.
Quality score: 72 of 100. Price score: 67 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$153.83 a share, 29% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $119.00 to $170.80.
Dividend: 2.7% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $1.4bn | $1.7bn | $2.0bn | $2.1bn | $2.2bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 9.2% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 3% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $576 million last quarter, up 5% on a year ago.
- Profit: $172 million, up 10% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $541 million, up from $86 million.
- 3% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $518m |
| December 2024 | $536m |
| March 2025 | $540m |
| June 2025 | $547m |
| September 2025 | $567m |
| December 2025 | $581m |
| March 2026 | $575m |
| June 2026 | $576m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $147m |
| December 2024 | $155m |
| March 2025 | $151m |
| June 2025 | $157m |
| September 2025 | $174m |
| December 2025 | $166m |
| March 2026 | $171m |
| June 2026 | $172m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 5 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 29 October 2026
Who owns it
7 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 7 last quarter. 569 funds in all.
- Mairs & PowerAndy Adams
- Value
- $7m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners
- Value
- $1m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Eagle Investment ManagementMatthew McLennan | $858m | 0.7% | Added |
| Aristotle Capital ManagementHoward Gleicher | $690m | 1.4% | Cut |
| Polaris Capital ManagementBernard Horn | $21m | 1.9% | Cut |
| Mairs & PowerAndy Adams | $7m | <0.1% | |
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $1m | <0.1% | |
| Boyar Asset ManagementMark Boyar | $463,096 | 0.3% | Cut |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $37,394 | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$1.1bnAdded
- First Eagle Investment Management$858mAdded
- Aristotle Capital Management$690mCut
- State Street$497mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$495m
- Vanguard Capital Management$420m
- Baillie Gifford$345mNew
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$255mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$207m
- King Luther Capital Management$193mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
4 investors own more than 5%.
- Aristotle Capital ManagementPassive investor7.5%−1.2 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor5.1%Since 31 March 2026
- STATE STREET CORPORATIONPassive investor5.1%+0.2 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.0%Since 31 March 2026
- Champlain Investment Partners, LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 December 2024
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Aristotle Capital Management Passive investor | 7.5%−1.2 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 5.1% | 31 March 2026 | |
STATE STREET CORPORATION Passive investor | 5.1%+0.2 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.0% | 31 March 2026 | |
Champlain Investment Partners, LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 December 2024 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 4 sold $350,133.
- Severyn Carol JeanGEVP and Chief Risk OfficerSold
- Date
- 12 June 2026
- Shares
- 837
- Price
- $148.29
- Value
- $124,119
- Berman BobbyGEVP Research & StrategySold
- Date
- 30 January 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $137.07
- Value
- $137,070
- Pullin Ericka LynnGEVP, Culture & People Dev.Sold
- Date
- 12 December 2025
- Shares
- 0
- Price
- $129.73
- Value
- $44
- Rhodes Coolidge E JRGroup EVP General Counsel/SecSold
- Date
- 9 December 2025
- Shares
- 700
- Price
- $127.00
- Value
- $88,900
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 June 2026 | Severyn Carol Jean GEVP and Chief Risk Officer | Sold | 837 | $148.29 | $124,119 |
| 30 January 2026 | Berman Bobby GEVP Research & Strategy | Sold | 1,000 | $137.07 | $137,070 |
| 12 December 2025 | Pullin Ericka Lynn GEVP, Culture & People Dev. | Sold | 0 | $129.73 | $44 |
| 9 December 2025 | Rhodes Coolidge E JR Group EVP General Counsel/Sec | Sold | 700 | $127.00 | $88,900 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 5 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
We Are Subject To the Potential Adverse Effects of a U.S. Federal Government Shutdown
Could happenA prolonged or repeated shutdown of the U.S. federal government could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. Funding gaps or lapses in federal appropriations may disrupt the operations of government agencies that provide critical economic data, administer regulatory functions, or directly support our customers and counterparties. During a shutdown, federal agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service, Small Business Administration, and various supervisory bodies may suspend or significantly curtail their activities, which can delay loan originations, hinder verification processes, impede regulatory approvals, and reduce the availability of government‑guaranteed lending programs.
Read moreWe Operate In A Highly Competitive Industry and Market Area
Could happenAlso, technology and other changes have lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. In particular, the activity of fintechs/wealthtechs has grown significantly over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Some fintechs/wealthtechs are not subject to the same regulation as we are, which may allow them to be more competitive. Fintechs/wealthtechs have and may continue to offer bank or bank-like products and a number of such organizations have applied for bank or industrial loan charters while others have partnered with existing banks to allow them to offer deposit products to their customers. Increased competition from fintechs/wealthtechs and the growth of digital banking may also lead to pricing pressures as competitors offer more low-fee and no-fee products In July 2025, President Trump signed into law the GENIUS Act, which establishes a regulatory framework for “payment stablecoins” and their issuers. Consumers and businesses may view payment stablecoins as a substitute for traditional bank deposits, resulting in deposit withdrawals. Depending on consumer and business interest in payment stablecoins, and the characteristics and utility of payment stablecoins, the passage of the GENIUS Act could result in increased competition with respect to our deposit products. However, the GENIUS Act requires the U.S. Treasury Department and federal and state regulators to issue regulations on numerous topics to interpret and implement the statute, so the effect of the GENIUS Act will depend on what those regulations provide.
Read moreOur Information Systems May Experience Failure, Interruption Or Breach In Security
Could happenFurthermore, the rapid development of quantum computing poses a material risk to the encryption standards currently securing our financial systems, as future quantum capabilities could enable unauthorized decryption of sensitive data, disruption of transaction integrity and invalidation of digital identities, potentially leading to financial losses and reputational damage.
Read moreWe Are Subject To the Potential Adverse Effects of a U.S. Federal Government Shutdown
Could happenThe duration and economic impact of any government shutdown are inherently uncertain, and any such event could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Increasing Fraud Risk Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition, and Reputation
Could happenSignificant fraud-related losses could negatively impact our earnings, capital, and liquidity. In addition, fraud incidents may harm our reputation, erode customer trust, and lead to regulatory scrutiny or enforcement actions. Failure to effectively manage and mitigate fraud risk could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.