Conmed
CNMD on NYSE. Conmed sells surgical devices and services to hospitals, surgical centers, and doctors. Market value $1.4bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $10.09 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 19.3 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 5 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 80 of 100. Price score: 76 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$44.48 a share, 41% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $31.44 to $53.66.
Dividend: 0.9% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $1.0bn | $1.0bn | $1.2bn | $1.3bn | $1.4bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 10.9% | 6.7% | 9.7% | 15.3% | 7.5% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.87 | 1.41 | 1.17 | 0.94 | 0.81 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.81× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 9.8% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| June 2024 | $332m |
| September 2024 | $317m |
| December 2024 | $346m |
| March 2025 | $321m |
| June 2025 | $342m |
| September 2025 | $338m |
| December 2025 | $373m |
| June 2026 | $343m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| June 2024 | $30m |
| September 2024 | $49m |
| December 2024 | $34m |
| March 2025 | $6m |
| June 2025 | $21m |
| September 2025 | $3m |
| December 2025 | $17m |
| June 2026 | $23m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 17 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 28 October 2026
Who owns it
6 long-term investors we follow own it, down from 7 last quarter. 246 funds in all.
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $2m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- Fenimore Asset Management (FAM Funds)John Fox
- Value
- $291,362
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooke & BielerCooke & Bieler partners | $19m | 0.2% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $13m | <0.1% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $12m | <0.1% | Added |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $2m | <0.1% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $489,379 | <0.1% | Cut |
| Fenimore Asset Management (FAM Funds)John Fox | $291,362 | <0.1% |
Sold out this quarter
- Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley teamSold out
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$158m
- Earnest Partners$82mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$72mAdded
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management$52mCut
- State Street$46mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$44mCut
- Bank of America$44mCut
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$43mCut
- SEI Investments$32m
- Invenomic Capital Management LP$28mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
4 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor15.1%Since 30 June 2025
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.9%Since 31 March 2026
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc.Passive investor5.6%Since 30 June 2025
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 31 March 2026
- Capital Research Global InvestorsPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 15.1% | 30 June 2025 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.9% | 31 March 2026 | |
Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. Passive investor | 5.6% | 30 June 2025 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
Capital Research Global Investors Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 2 sold $161,091, $161,091 of it under preset trading plans.
- Glaze RichardChief Information OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 21 November 2025
- Shares
- 257
- Price
- $41.21
- Value
- $10,591
- Garner Todd WExecutive Vice President & CFOSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 6 November 2025
- Shares
- 3,500
- Price
- $43.00
- Value
- $150,500
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 November 2025 | Glaze Richard Chief Information Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 257 | $41.21 | $10,591 |
| 6 November 2025 | Garner Todd W Executive Vice President & CFO | Sold under a preset trading plan | 3,500 | $43.00 | $150,500 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 17 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 29 Jul 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our financial performance is subject to risks in connection with divestitures, and our failure to manage these divestitures could have a negative impact on our business.
Could happenIn addition, it could be challenging and time-consuming to provide transition services to the purchasers of our divested operations. We may experience (i) disputes with the purchasers regarding the nature and sufficiency of the transition services we provide or the terms and conditions of our commercial agreements with the purchasers, (ii) greater tax or other costs or realize fewer benefits than anticipated under our post-closing agreements with the purchasers, (iii) higher vendor costs due to reduced economies of scale or other similar dis-synergies, (iv) weaker performance to the extent segregation and support of the divestiture distracts personnel or diverts resources from the operation, digitization, and transformation of our retained business, (v) losses or increased inefficiencies from stranded or underutilized assets, (vi) the loss of any customers dissatisfied with our services post-closing, (vii) challenges in retaining and attracting personnel or (viii) operational or commercial difficulties segregating the divested assets from our retained assets.
Read moreDisruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages, staffing limitations, or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, prevent new or modified products from being developed, reviewed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.
Could happenThe ability of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new medical devices or modifications to approved medical devices to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, in recent years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities. In addition, the current U.S. presidential administration has issued certain policies and executive orders directed towards reducing the employee headcount and costs associated with U.S. administrative agencies, including the FDA, and it remains unclear the degree to which these efforts may limit or otherwise adversely affect the FDA’s ability to conduct routine activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if renewed global concerns, funding shortages or staffing limitations hinder or prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other such regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Read moreOur use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other emerging technologies could adversely impact our business and financial results.
Could happenWe have begun to deploy AI and other emerging technologies in various facets of our operations, and we continue to explore further use cases. The rapid advancement of these technologies presents opportunities for us in research, manufacturing, commercialization, and other business endeavors, but also entails risks, including that AI-generated content, analyses, or recommendations we utilize could be deficient, that our competitors may more quickly or effectively adopt AI capabilities, or that our use of AI or other emerging technologies increases regulatory, privacy, cybersecurity and other significant risks. In addition, any disruption or failure in the AI functionality we incorporate into our business activities, products or services could adversely impact our business or result in delays or errors in our product offerings. The legal and regulatory landscape surrounding AI technologies is rapidly evolving and uncertain, including in the areas of intellectual property, cybersecurity and privacy and data protection. Compliance with new or changing laws, regulations or industry standards relating to AI may impose significant costs on us and limit our ability to effectively develop, deploy or use AI technologies. Furthermore, if we are unable to effectively manage the use of AI technologies by our employees and service providers, our confidential information, intellectual property and reputation could be put at risk. Failure to appropriately respond to this evolving landscape may result in reputational, competitive and business harm as well as litigation and regulatory action and fines, penalties and expenses related thereto.
Read moreOur financial performance is subject to risks in connection with divestitures, and our failure to manage these divestitures could have a negative impact on our business.
Could happenAs a result of our business strategy, we may, from time to time, discontinue or divest certain products or product portfolios, such as our gastroenterology product lines. If we decide to engage in such divestitures, we may encounter difficulty finding buyers or alternative exit strategies, which could impact the achievement of our strategic objectives. We could also fail to obtain necessary regulatory approval or incur higher costs or charges than planned or incur unexpected charges and could experience unanticipated impacts to our business, any of which could have a negative impact on our results of operations. Moreover, our financial results may be adversely impacted by the impacts from the loss of earnings associated with divested products or product portfolios. In addition to unanticipated delays, costs and other issues, divestitures may also expose us to liabilities or claims for indemnification for retained liabilities or indemnification obligations associated with the assets that we sell. The magnitude of any such liability or obligation may be difficult to quantify at the time of the transaction. We cannot predict the ultimate resolution of these matters, and there can be no assurance that any such resolution, which may take several years, will not adversely impact our financial position or results of operations.
Read moreWe could experience a failure of a key information technology system, process or site or a breach of information security, including a cybersecurity breach or failure of one or more key information technology systems, networks, processes, associated sites or service providers, and could potentially become liable for a breach of various data privacy regulations.
Could happenAdditionally, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), including the expanded requirements under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, establish comprehensive standards with respect to the use and disclosure of protected health information (“PHI”). HIPAA imposes privacy and security obligations on covered entity health care providers, health plans, and health care clearinghouses, as well as their “business associates”—certain persons or entities that create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI in connection with providing a specified service or performing a function on behalf of a covered entity. We are subject to HIPAA as a business associate. If we do not comply with the applicable requirements of HIPAA or applicable state privacy and security laws, we could be subject to criminal or civil sanctions that could adversely affect our financial condition. The costs of complying with privacy and security related legal and regulatory requirements are substantial and could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, a security breach could require reporting to federal and state government entities, notification to affected individuals, expensive investigation and remediation and mitigation. Government agencies could, in their discretion, impose fines and penalties relating to the breach, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.