Collegium Pharmaceutical

COLL on Nasdaq. Collegium Pharmaceutical sells ADHD and pain medicines to patients in the United States. Market value $712m.

Watch this stockFree. We tell you when something changes.

Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.

We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.

Should I look at this?

Worth a closer look

Read what could go wrong

This is not advice. Check the numbers below.

Compare with another stock

Cash yield
past 12 months to June 2026
46.1%very high

For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $46.11 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.

Price to profit
past 12 months to June 2026
n/a

The filings do not give us enough to work this out.

Return on capital
five annual reports to December 2025
n/a

The filings do not give us enough to work this out.

Quality score: 80 of 100. Price score: 83 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.

$21.87 a share, 2% above its 1-year low

Over the past year the price has ranged from $21.43 to $50.79.

Pays no dividend

Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).

Five years of cash, in billions

0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
2021202220232024202512 monthsto Jun '26
Revenue
$277m$464m$567m$631m$781m
Operating margin
6.4%7.2%29.5%26.9%23.0%
Debt to equity
n/an/an/an/an/a
Shares outstanding
0.03bn0.03bn0.03bn0.03bn0.03bn

Health checks

  • Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
  • Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
  • Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 8 checks we could run
  • Profit backed by cash (accruals)No
  • DebtUnknown
  • Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 20.3% a year
  • Buying back its own sharesYes, 3% fewer since 2021

The quarter to June 2026

How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.

  • Sales: $200 million last quarter, up 6% on a year ago.
  • A loss of $15 million, after a profit of $12 million a year ago.
  • It keeps 19 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 18 cents a year earlier.
  • Spare cash over the past 12 months: $328 million, up from $202 million.
  • 17% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
  • Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
Sales by quarter
Sales by quarter
Quarter toAmount
September 2024$159m
December 2024$182m
March 2025$178m
June 2025$188m
September 2025$209m
December 2025$205m
March 2026$194m
June 2026$200m
Profit by quarter
Profit by quarter
Quarter toAmount
September 2024$9m
December 2024$13m
March 2025$2m
June 2025$12m
September 2025$32m
December 2025$17m
March 2026$14m
June 2026-$15m

From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.

Dates

Next results (estimated)
n/a
Last annual report (10-K)
26 February 2026
Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
5 November 2026

Who owns it

4 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 4 last quarter. 279 funds in all.

Jun '25
Dec '25
Jun '26
Largest holders overall

From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.

Big holders and activists

10 investors own more than 5%.

From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.

What insiders did

No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 8 sold $7m, $5m of it under preset trading plans.

  • Freund John Gordon
    Director
    Sold
    Date
    18 May 2026
    Shares
    20
    Price
    $34.05
    Value
    $681
  • Freund John Gordon
    Director
    Sold
    Date
    15 May 2026
    Shares
    4,127
    Price
    $34.54
    Value
    $142,547
  • Lurker Nancy
    Director
    Sold
    Date
    13 May 2026
    Shares
    4,500
    Price
    $35.97
    Value
    $161,865
  • BOHLIN GAREN G
    Director
    Sold
    Date
    11 May 2026
    Shares
    8,700
    Price
    $37.18
    Value
    $323,466
  • Dieter David
    EVP & General Counsel
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    18 March 2026
    Shares
    13,976
    Price
    $34.92
    Value
    $488,042
  • Dieter David
    EVP & General Counsel
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    9 March 2026
    Shares
    6,224
    Price
    $36.65
    Value
    $228,110
  • Dreyer Scott
    EVP & Chief Commercial Officer
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    3 March 2026
    Shares
    49,976
    Price
    $40.40
    Value
    $2m
  • Dreyer Scott
    EVP & Chief Commercial Officer
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    8 December 2025
    Shares
    17,600
    Price
    $48.17
    Value
    $847,850
  • Balice-Gordon Rita J.
    Director
    Sold
    Date
    5 December 2025
    Shares
    3,650
    Price
    $47.03
    Value
    $171,660
  • Fallon John A.
    Director
    Sold
    Date
    12 November 2025
    Shares
    34,853
    Price
    $47.21
    Value
    $2m

From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.

Warning signs in its filings

Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.

None of the serious warning signs we check for were found. 1 thing worth knowing.

We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.

We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.

  • One big customer

    Worth knowing

    One customer brings in a big share of sales: 34% last year. Losing that customer would hurt.

    “These same three customers comprised 34 %, 34 %, and 29 % of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2025”

    From the 10-K filed 26 February 2026, Item 8. Financial Statements and Notes. Read it in the filing

A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.

What could go wrong

Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.

Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.

What changed in the risks this year

Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.

  • The use of artificial intelligence technologies in our business could expose us to significant data privacy and regulatory risks.

    Could happen
    Additionally, the regulatory environment for AI is rapidly evolving, with new and changing laws and regulations emerging at local, national, and international levels. These include specific rules governing privacy, automated decision-making, and other AI-related activities. Compliance requirements in this area may increase our operational costs, require material changes to our business practices, or restrict certain uses of AI technologies. For example, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”), the world’s first comprehensive AI law, entered into force in 2024 and, with some exceptions, will become effective in 2026. This legislation imposes significant obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems, and encourages providers and deployers of AI systems to account for EU ethical principles in their development and use of these systems. In the future, our development or use of AI systems that are governed by the EU AI Act and/or uncertainty arising from rapidly developing laws and regulations governing AI may necessitate higher standards of data quality, transparency, and human oversight, as well as adhering to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements. In the U.S., the AI regulatory environment is complex and uncertain. Over the past year, states have advanced, and in some cases passed, dozens of laws focusing on AI governance and regulation, including on deployment of AI in healthcare settings. At the federal level, the Trump Administration has endorsed a federal moratorium on the enforcement of state AI laws, including through a December 11, 2025, executive order on “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence.” So far, these efforts have not been successful at curtailing state action on AI regulation, contributing to a complicated legislative patchwork, which may be litigated in state and federal courts. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory standards could result in regulatory investigations, penalties, forced disgorgement of data or insights, and additional constraints on our business, all of which could materially affect our financial results and prospects.
    Read more
  • The use of artificial intelligence technologies in our business could expose us to significant data privacy and regulatory risks.

    Could happen
    The integration of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies, including generative AI, machine learning, and similar tools, into our operations or by our third-party partners may introduce or heighten various data privacy and security risks. We use and integrate AI primarily to support internal productivity activities, including drafting documents, and other non-clinical, non-operational materials. We do not use our AI systems to make autonomous decisions related to clinical development, patient care, pricing, credit, employment decisions, or other regulated or sensitive activities, and outputs generated using AI are subject to human review and approval prior to any external use or publication. Notwithstanding these controls, the use of AI presents evolving risks, including potential inaccuracies, unintended disclosure of confidential information, intellectual property concerns and cybersecurity risks. The processing or input of sensitive, confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal data into AI systems, especially those operated by third-party platforms, could result in the unintentional release or leakage of such data. There is a risk that inputted information may be used to train external systems, leading to unauthorized exposure or misuse of data. This could expose us to information security breaches, loss of competitive advantages, and potential violations of privacy standards, all of which may adversely impact our business operations and brand trust.
    Read more
  • If the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities approve generic products with claims that compete with our products, our sales could decline.

    Could happen
    Once an NDA, including a Section 505(b)(2) application, is approved, the product covered thereby becomes a “listed drug” which can, in turn, be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an ANDA. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, FDA regulations and other applicable regulations and policies provide incentives to manufacturers to create modified, non-infringing versions of a drug to facilitate the approval of an ANDA or other application for generic substitutes. These generic equivalents would be significantly less costly than ours to bring to market and companies that produce generic equivalents are generally able to offer their products at lower prices. Additionally, under the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022, FDA will assign therapeutic equivalence ratings for certain prescription drugs approved via the Section 505(b)(2) NDA pathway with respect to other approved drug products and it is unclear how assignment of these ratings will impact the market opportunity for our products. Thus, after the introduction of a generic competitor, a significant percentage of the sales of any branded product are typically lost to the generic product. Accordingly, competition from generic equivalents to our products would substantially limit our ability to generate revenues and therefore, to obtain a return on the investments we have made in our products. In the past, we have initiated litigation with generic competitors that have filed Paragraph IV Certifications challenging certain of our patents. While we have entered into settlement agreements with certain competitors, we are currently pursuing litigation to defend against Paragraph IV Certifications related to Belbuca. Refer to Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies , to our consolidated financial statements included in Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that we will continue to be subject to ANDA-related litigation, which can be costly and distracting and has the potential to impact the long-term value of our products.
    Read more
  • Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

    Could happen
    As of December 31, 2025, we had a gross U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward of approximately $66.6 million and state NOL carryovers of approximately $192.4 million. The U.S. federal and state NOL carryforwards expire at various dates through 2037. Federal NOLs and certain state NOLs incurred in 2018 and onward have an indefinite expiration under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and applicable state statutes. We also had U.S. federal tax credits of approximately $0.7 million. We do not have any state tax credits. These tax attributes are generally subject to a limited carryover/carryback period and are also subject to the annual limitations that may be imposed under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Refer to Note 19, Income Taxes , to our consolidated financial statements included in Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
    Read more
  • We may not realize all the anticipated benefits from our future acquisitions, and we may be unable to successfully integrate future acquisitions.

    Could happen
    Any of these or other similar risks could lead to potential adverse short-term or long-term effects on our operating results. The process of integrating our operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our business. Members of our management may be required to devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process, which decreases the time they have to manage our business. If our management is not able to effectively manage the integration process, or if any business activities are interrupted as a result of the integration process, our business could suffer.
    Read more

Read it in the annual report

The deep dive

Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.

  • What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
  • Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
  • The three things that would make this a mistake
  • Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Create a free account to run it

Your first deep dive is free.

What a finished deep dive looks like

Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.