Crocs
CROX on Nasdaq. Crocs sells casual shoes, sandals, and charms to people worldwide. Market value $5.7bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $12.43 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 8.1 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 27 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 100 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$118.19 a share, 61% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $73.21 to $141.28.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $2.3bn | $3.6bn | $4.0bn | $4.1bn | $4.0bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 29.5% | 23.9% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 3.7% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 54.78 | 2.84 | 1.14 | 0.74 | 0.95 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.05bn | 0.05bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)No
- Debt0.95× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 23.9% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 22% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.2 billion last quarter, up 3% on a year ago.
- Profit: $205 million, after a loss of $492 million a year ago.
- It keeps 21 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 6 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $705 million, down from $769 million.
- 11% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $1.1 billion more than cash, down from $1.2 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 1 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $1.1bn |
| December 2024 | $990m |
| March 2025 | $937m |
| June 2025 | $1.1bn |
| September 2025 | $996m |
| December 2025 | $958m |
| March 2026 | $921m |
| June 2026 | $1.2bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $200m |
| December 2024 | $369m |
| March 2025 | $160m |
| June 2025 | -$492m |
| September 2025 | $146m |
| December 2025 | $105m |
| March 2026 | $138m |
| June 2026 | $205m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 12 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 29 October 2026
Who owns it
12 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 11 last quarter. 501 funds in all.
- Himalaya CapitalLi Lu
- Value
- $107m
- Share of fund
- 2.9%
- Greenlight CapitalDavid Einhorn
- Value
- $81m
- Share of fund
- 2.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $218m | 0.4% | Added |
| Himalaya CapitalLi Lu | $107m | 2.9% | |
| Patient Capital ManagementSamantha McLemore | $96m | 3.2% | Cut |
| Greenlight CapitalDavid Einhorn | $81m | 2.1% | |
| Punch Card ManagementNorbert Lou | $70m | 27.2% | Cut |
| Smead Capital ManagementBill Smead | $59m | 1.3% | Cut |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $23m | <0.1% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $16m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $5m | <0.1% | Cut |
| Miller Value PartnersBill Miller IV | $3m | 0.8% | Cut |
| Oldfield PartnersRichard Oldfield | $2m | 0.6% | New |
| Tweedy, BrowneTweedy Browne partners | $2m | 0.2% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$561mCut
- Banque Cantonale Vaudoise$455mAdded
- FMR$423mCut
- Vanguard Capital Management$261m
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$253m
- LSV Asset Management$218mAdded
- State Street$192m
- American Century Companies$178mAdded
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management$157mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$143mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 7.1%−1.1 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- WIT Partners Advisory Pte. Ltd.Passive investor5.3%0.0 ptsSince 28 February 2025
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.1%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 7.1%−1.1 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
WIT Partners Advisory Pte. Ltd. Passive investor | 5.3%0.0 pts | 28 February 2025 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.1% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 3 insiders bought $836,070 of shares on the open market. 3 sold $10m.
- KAPLAN BETH JDirectorBought
- Date
- 15 September 2026
- Shares
- 885
- Price
- $112.12
- Value
- $99,228
- SMACH THOMAS JDirectorBought
- Date
- 15 September 2026
- Shares
- 680
- Price
- $111.49
- Value
- $75,813
- SMACH THOMAS JDirectorBought
- Date
- 10 September 2026
- Shares
- 4,000
- Price
- $109.38
- Value
- $437,530
- Rees AndrewChief Executive Officer, DirectorSold
- Date
- 10 August 2026
- Shares
- 19,072
- Price
- $138.91
- Value
- $3m
- Rees AndrewChief Executive Officer, DirectorSold
- Date
- 7 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,928
- Price
- $137.76
- Value
- $2m
- Rees AndrewChief Executive Officer, DirectorSold
- Date
- 5 June 2026
- Shares
- 32,688
- Price
- $118.09
- Value
- $4m
- MEHLMAN ANNEEVP & Crocs Brand PresidentSold
- Date
- 20 February 2026
- Shares
- 12,145
- Price
- $100.06
- Value
- $1m
- SMACH THOMAS JDirectorSold
- Date
- 20 February 2026
- Shares
- 4,963
- Price
- $100.00
- Value
- $496,300
- SMACH THOMAS JDirectorSold
- Date
- 13 February 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $98.41
- Value
- $492,050
- REPLOGLE JOHN BDirectorBought
- Date
- 11 November 2025
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $74.50
- Value
- $223,500
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 September 2026 | KAPLAN BETH J Director | Bought | 885 | $112.12 | $99,228 |
| 15 September 2026 | SMACH THOMAS J Director | Bought | 680 | $111.49 | $75,813 |
| 10 September 2026 | SMACH THOMAS J Director | Bought | 4,000 | $109.38 | $437,530 |
| 10 August 2026 | Rees Andrew Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 19,072 | $138.91 | $3m |
| 7 August 2026 | Rees Andrew Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 10,928 | $137.76 | $2m |
| 5 June 2026 | Rees Andrew Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 32,688 | $118.09 | $4m |
| 20 February 2026 | MEHLMAN ANNE EVP & Crocs Brand President | Sold | 12,145 | $100.06 | $1m |
| 20 February 2026 | SMACH THOMAS J Director | Sold | 4,963 | $100.00 | $496,300 |
| 13 February 2026 | SMACH THOMAS J Director | Sold | 5,000 | $98.41 | $492,050 |
| 11 November 2025 | REPLOGLE JOHN B Director | Bought | 3,000 | $74.50 | $223,500 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 12 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026 and 3 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
If our online e-commerce sites, or those of our customers, or third-party digital marketplaces on which we operate, do not function effectively, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
Could happenFurthermore, the economics of social commerce remain uncertain. Platforms may, among other things, raise fees, reduce incentives or subsidies, revise revenue‑share arrangements, or introduce paid placement requirements that increase our customer acquisition costs or compress margins. Shifts in platform algorithms and consumer behavior can rapidly change traffic patterns and demand, and our investments in content, creative, and influencer relationships may not yield the anticipated returns. We depend on access to accurate, timely, and sufficiently granular data from these platforms to optimize marketing and inventory and restrictions on data availability, quality, or portability, whether due to platform policy, privacy laws, or technical changes, could also have a negative impact on our ability to measure performance and manage our business.
Read moreIf our online e-commerce sites, or those of our customers, or third-party digital marketplaces on which we operate, do not function effectively, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
Could happenWe are also exposed to evolving legal, regulatory, and geopolitical developments that may materially impact social commerce channels. Governmental actions, investigations, or restrictions targeting specific platforms or their parent companies, including potential bans, limitations on app store availability, forced divestitures, or heightened data‑privacy and content‑moderation requirements, could impair or eliminate our access to certain platforms, reduce user engagement, or necessitate costly changes to our operations and technology. Increased scrutiny of youth marketing, endorsements and influencer advertising, data collection and cross‑border data transfers, and artificial intelligence–driven recommendations may also lead to new compliance obligations, enforcement actions, fines, or litigation, including class actions and claims under consumer protection, privacy, advertising, or intellectual property laws. If we or our influencers, affiliates, or vendors fail to comply with applicable platform terms or legal requirements, we could face account suspensions, content removals, monetization limits, or termination.
Read moreIf our online e-commerce sites, or those of our customers, or third-party digital marketplaces on which we operate, do not function effectively, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
Our participation on these platforms also exposes us to certain operational and reputational risks. We have in the past, and may again in the future, encounter counterfeit, gray market, or unauthorized sellers offering similar or infringing products at lower prices, which could impact, among other things, our pricing and brand equity. In addition, because these platforms often control payment flows and dispute resolution processes, we may experience withheld funds, increased reserves, or unfavorable chargeback determinations that we are unable to contest effectively. In addition, platform‑mandated logistics or return policies may increase our shipping, warehousing, and reverse‑logistics costs, and fulfillment errors by platform partners may be attributed to us by consumers.
Read moreOur success depends substantially on the value of our brands; failure to strengthen and preserve this value, either through our actions or those of our business partners, could have a negative impact on our financial results.
Already happenedIn the past, several footwear companies, including ours, have experienced periods of rapid growth in revenues and earnings followed by periods of declining revenues and losses, and our business may be similarly affected in the future. For example, during the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025, there was a triggering event for the HEYDUDE Brand indefinite-lived intangible assets (which consists solely of the HEYDUDE trademark) (the “trademark”) and the HEYDUDE Brand reporting unit (the ‘reporting unit”) goodwill. The triggering event was due to downward revisions during the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025 to our internal HEYDUDE Brand forecast as a result of the extended time we believed it would take us to stabilize the HEYDUDE Brand and return it to growth. This was partly due to the current and projected impact of a weak U.S. consumer and the disproportionate impact of tariffs on HEYDUDE Brand products, which became evident in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025. See also the risk factor under “Financial and Accounting Risks — We may incur impairments of the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.” Consumer demand for our products and the equity of our brands could also diminish significantly if we, among other things, fail to preserve the quality of our products, are perceived to act in an unethical or socially irresponsible manner, fail to comply with laws and regulations, or fail to deliver a consistently positive consumer experience in each of our markets.
Read moreWe may incur impairments of the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Already happenedIn connection with the HEYDUDE acquisition, we allocated approximately $710.0 million and $1,780.0 million to goodwill and definite- and indefinite-lived intangible assets, respectively. We evaluate the carrying value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill at least annually or when an interim triggering event has occurred indicating potential impairment. During the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025, there was a triggering event for the trademark and the reporting unit goodwill, which resulted in non-cash impairment charges of $430.0 million for the trademark and $307.0 million for the reporting unit goodwill. The triggering event was due to downward revisions during the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025 to our internal HEYDUDE Brand forecast as a result of the extended time we believed it would take us to stabilize the HEYDUDE Brand and return it to growth. This was partly due to the current and projected impact of a weak U.S. consumer and the disproportionate impact of tariffs on HEYDUDE Brand products, which became evident in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025. Our impairment evaluations represent a critical accounting policy as they require significant judgments and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable but that are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Changes in the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets could result in impairment charges in future periods as the key assumptions are inherently uncertain, require significant judgment and are subject to change based on, among others, industry and geopolitical conditions, our ability to navigate changing macroeconomic conditions and trends as well as the timing and success of strategic initiatives. In addition, certain factors, such as failure to achieve forecasted revenue growth rates, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or increases in the discount rates, have the potential to create variances in the estimated fair values of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets that could result in additional impairment charges in future periods. See Part II - Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 4 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.