Darling Ingredients
DAR on NYSE. Darling Ingredients sells animal by-products and recycled oils to food, feed, fuel, fertilizer makers. Market value $9.9bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $6.87 of spare cash last year. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 14.4 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 8 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 89 of 100. Price score: 95 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$62.70 a share, 115% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $29.15 to $69.98.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $4.7bn | $6.5bn | $6.8bn | $5.7bn | $6.1bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 18.7% | 15.8% | 14.0% | 8.2% | 4.5% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.45 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.83 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.16bn | 0.16bn | 0.16bn | 0.16bn | 0.16bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)8 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.83× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 11.4% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.7 billion last quarter, up 16% on a year ago.
- Profit: $387 million, up 2959% on a year ago.
- It keeps 15 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 5 cents a year earlier.
- 1% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
- Debt is $3.8 billion more than cash, down from $3.9 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $1.4bn |
| December 2024 | $1.4bn |
| March 2025 | $1.4bn |
| June 2025 | $1.5bn |
| September 2025 | $1.6bn |
| December 2025 | $1.7bn |
| March 2026 | $1.6bn |
| June 2026 | $1.7bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $17m |
| December 2024 | $102m |
| March 2025 | -$26m |
| June 2025 | $13m |
| September 2025 | $19m |
| December 2025 | $57m |
| March 2026 | $134m |
| June 2026 | $387m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 3 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 6 November 2026
Who owns it
9 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 9 last quarter. 614 funds in all.
- Yacktman Asset ManagementStephen Yacktman
- Value
- $77m
- Share of fund
- 1.0%
- Bruce & Co.R. Jeffrey Bruce
- Value
- $6m
- Share of fund
- 1.6%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $229,404
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gates Capital ManagementJeff Gates | $159m | 5.2% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $126m | 0.3% | Cut |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $119m | 0.4% | Cut |
| Yacktman Asset ManagementStephen Yacktman | $77m | 1.0% | |
| SouthernSun Asset ManagementMichael Cook | $42m | 5.6% | Cut |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $14m | <0.1% | Added |
| Davis Selected AdvisersChris Davis | $9m | <0.1% | Cut |
| Bruce & Co.R. Jeffrey Bruce | $6m | 1.6% | |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $229,404 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$851mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$456mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$449m
- Vanguard Capital Management$393m
- State Street$311mAdded
- Assenagon Asset Management$242mAdded
- Earnest Partners$223mCut
- Citadel Advisors$220mAdded
- AQR Capital Management$212mAdded
- FMR$205mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
4 investors own more than 5%.
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.2%Since 31 March 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investor5.1%Since 31 December 2025
- Gates Capital Management GP, LLCPassive investorat least 4.4%−0.6 pts(filed with 2 related holders)Since 30 June 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | 5.1% | 31 December 2025 | |
Gates Capital Management GP, LLC Passive investor | at least 4.4%−0.6 pts (filed with 2 related holders) | 30 June 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $60,970 of shares on the open market. 6 sold $5m.
- STUEWE RANDALL CChairman and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $68.20
- Value
- $341,000
- MANZI JOSEPHChief Accounting OfficerSold
- Date
- 18 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $67.27
- Value
- $67,270
- Dudley SandraEVP Chief Strategy OfficerSold
- Date
- 17 August 2026
- Shares
- 6,474
- Price
- $67.87
- Value
- $439,416
- McNutt PatrickEVP Chief Admin OfficerSold
- Date
- 14 August 2026
- Shares
- 8,000
- Price
- $67.09
- Value
- $536,720
- STUEWE RANDALL CChairman and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 13 August 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $64.79
- Value
- $323,950
- STUEWE RANDALL CChairman and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 12 August 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $63.26
- Value
- $316,300
- Kemphaus Nicholas JamesEVP Gen. Counsel & SecretarySold
- Date
- 10 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,591
- Price
- $63.05
- Value
- $100,313
- Adair Charles LDirectorBought
- Date
- 31 July 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $60.97
- Value
- $60,970
- MANZI JOSEPHChief Accounting OfficerSold
- Date
- 1 May 2026
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $63.89
- Value
- $191,670
- STUEWE RANDALL CChairman and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 6 March 2026
- Shares
- 20,000
- Price
- $52.12
- Value
- $1m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 September 2026 | STUEWE RANDALL C Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 5,000 | $68.20 | $341,000 |
| 18 August 2026 | MANZI JOSEPH Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 1,000 | $67.27 | $67,270 |
| 17 August 2026 | Dudley Sandra EVP Chief Strategy Officer | Sold | 6,474 | $67.87 | $439,416 |
| 14 August 2026 | McNutt Patrick EVP Chief Admin Officer | Sold | 8,000 | $67.09 | $536,720 |
| 13 August 2026 | STUEWE RANDALL C Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 5,000 | $64.79 | $323,950 |
| 12 August 2026 | STUEWE RANDALL C Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 5,000 | $63.26 | $316,300 |
| 10 August 2026 | Kemphaus Nicholas James EVP Gen. Counsel & Secretary | Sold | 1,591 | $63.05 | $100,313 |
| 31 July 2026 | Adair Charles L Director | Bought | 1,000 | $60.97 | $60,970 |
| 1 May 2026 | MANZI JOSEPH Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 3,000 | $63.89 | $191,670 |
| 6 March 2026 | STUEWE RANDALL C Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 20,000 | $52.12 | $1m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 3 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 7 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our renewable energy businesses, including the DGD Joint Venture, are highly dependent on government programs, incentives and regulatory frameworks, which are subject to change and uncertainty.
Could happenIn January 2025, the Clean Fuels Production Credit (“CFPC”) introduced under the IR Act became effective through 2027, and replaced the blender tax credit that was in effect in prior years. Under the CFPC, non-aviation transportation fuel receives a tax credit equal to either $0.20/gallon or $1.00/gallon (adjusted for inflation each calendar year) multiplied by the fuel’s emission reduction percentage. In order to start with the $1.00 per gallon baseline, the fuel must be produced at a qualifying facility that meets the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements before being sold in a certain manner. Under the CFPC, SAF receives a tax credit equal to either $0.35/gallon or $1.75/gallon (adjusted for inflation each calendar year) multiplied by the fuel’s emission reduction percentage. In order to start with the $1.75 per gallon baseline, SAF must be produced in the United States at a qualifying facility that meets the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements before being sold for use in an aircraft. In contrast to the blender tax credit, the CFPC requires that production of eligible fuels must take place in the United States. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”) was enacted in the U.S. The OBBBA extended the CFPC for two years through 2029 and, beginning in 2026, reduces the maximum credit rate for SAF to $1.00/gallon (adjusted for inflation each calendar year) and specifies that transportation fuels must be derived from feedstocks produced or grown in the U.S., Mexico or Canada to be eligible.
Read moreWe face risks associated with our international activities, which could negatively affect our sales to customers in foreign countries and our operations and assets in such countries.
Could happen• issues associated with intellectual property protections for the Company’s products and operations, such as defense of our intellectual property in foreign countries and/or, as the Company expands globally, use of our intellectual property on competing products in certain countries where our intellectual property is not registered;
Read moreWe may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or joint ventures on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or joint ventures, and such acquisitions or joint ventures could result in unknown liabilities, unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and require significant management resources.
Could happenWe regularly review potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, services or products and evaluate joint venture opportunities, including the announced and proposed joint venture with Tessenderlo Group NV to combine the Company’s and Tessenderlo Group NV’s respective collagen and gelatin business units. However, we may be unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or joint venture partners in the future. Even if we identify appropriate acquisition candidates or joint venture partners, we may be unable to complete or finance such acquisitions or joint ventures on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business, service or product into our existing business and operations or forming a joint venture may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company or formation of a joint venture also may require significant management resources that otherwise would be available for the ongoing development of our business. Moreover, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, joint venture or strategic alliance and such transactions may not generate anticipated financial results. Future acquisitions could also require us to incur indebtedness, assume contingent liabilities or amortize expenses related to intangible assets, any of which could harm our business and/or negatively impact our results of operations. Finally, acquisitions and joint ventures may be structured in such a manner that would result in the assumption of unknown liabilities not disclosed by the counterparty or uncovered during pre-acquisition due diligence.
Read moreThe DGD Joint Venture subjects us to a number of risks.
Could happen• U.S. and foreign tariffs on biofuels and biofuel feedstocks could also have an inverse effect where biofuel imports into certain countries could be beneficially positioned from a margin standpoint over local production;
Seasonal factors and weather, including the physical impacts of climate related changes, can impact the availability, quality and volume of raw materials that we process and negatively affect our operations.
Could happenFurthermore, there is legislation (and additional legislation has been introduced) regulating practices related to the causes and impacts of climate change as well as supply chain control and compliance with human rights. For example, in December 2022 the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2022/2464, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”), which requires reporting on sustainability-related issues. In addition, in June 2024 the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2024/1760, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (“CSDDD”), which requires risk-based supply chain due diligence and certain activities in the supply chain. In addition, there has been increased state-level legislation in the U.S., like California’s SB 261, which mandates certain companies doing business in California to disclose climate-related financial risks, and SB 253, which requires reporting of corporate greenhouse gas emissions. In both the EU and California the regulations have been delayed pending amendments and legal challenges, which increases the uncertainty around final impacts to the Company. The Company continues to monitor proposed changes to these and other proposed legislative and regulatory requirements related to sustainability issues in state and national jurisdictions. Compliance with CSRD, CSDDD, California’s SB 261 and SB 253, and other proposed or adopted legislative and regulatory requirements related to sustainability issues may require expenditures that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. There has also been increased focus from our stakeholders, including consumers, customers, suppliers, employees and investors, on our sustainability practices. We expect that stakeholder expectations with respect to sustainability will continue to progress, which may necessitate additional resources to monitor, report on, and adjust our operations.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.