Deckers Outdoor
DECK on NYSE. Deckers Brands sells footwear, apparel, and accessories to retailers, distributors, and consumers. Market value $10.9bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to March 2026.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $10.22 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
The filings do not give us enough to work this out.
The filings do not give us enough to work this out.
Quality score: 80 of 100. Price score: 83 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$80.21 a share, 4% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $77.20 to $122.29.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $3.2bn | $3.6bn | $4.3bn | $5.0bn | $5.5bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 17.9% | 18.0% | 21.6% | 23.6% | 23.1% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.15bn | 0.14bn | 0.14bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- DebtUnknown
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 16.5% a year
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 418% more shares since 2022
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1 billion last quarter, up 6% on a year ago.
- Profit: $130 million, down 7% on a year ago.
- It keeps 23 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 24 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $1.1 billion, up from $880 million.
- 7% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $1.3bn |
| December 2024 | $1.8bn |
| March 2025 | $1.0bn |
| June 2025 | $965m |
| September 2025 | $1.4bn |
| December 2025 | $2.0bn |
| March 2026 | $1.1bn |
| June 2026 | $1.0bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $242m |
| December 2024 | $457m |
| March 2025 | $151m |
| June 2025 | $139m |
| September 2025 | $268m |
| December 2025 | $481m |
| March 2026 | $136m |
| June 2026 | $130m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 22 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 22 May 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 29 October 2026
Who owns it
7 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 7 last quarter. 863 funds in all.
- Semper AugustusChristopher Bloomstran
- Value
- $67m
- Share of fund
- 7.5%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semper AugustusChristopher Bloomstran | $67m | 7.5% | |
| Greenlight CapitalDavid Einhorn | $50m | 1.3% | Added |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $33m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $12m | <0.1% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $9m | <0.1% | Added |
| Auxier Asset ManagementJeff Auxier | $621,754 | <0.1% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $467,000 | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$1.3bnCut
- Banque Cantonale Vaudoise$1.3bnAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$911m
- State Street$628mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$590m
- FMR$525mCut
- Geode Capital Management$424mAdded
- Invesco$306mAdded
- AQR Capital Management$270mCut
- Morgan Stanley$243mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor9.5%Since 31 March 2025
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.5%Since 31 March 2026
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 4.3%−2.6 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 9.5% | 31 March 2025 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.5% | 31 March 2026 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 4.3%−2.6 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 4 sold $1m, $118,910 of it under preset trading plans.
- Shanahan Lauri MDirectorSold
- Date
- 13 February 2026
- Shares
- 4,682
- Price
- $114.84
- Value
- $537,681
- Spangenberg AnnePresident, Fashion LifestyleSold
- Date
- 13 February 2026
- Shares
- 4,063
- Price
- $116.02
- Value
- $471,389
- Spring-Green RobinPresident, HokaSold
- Date
- 13 February 2026
- Shares
- 347
- Price
- $113.78
- Value
- $39,482
- Ogbechie AngelaChief Supply Chain OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 31 October 2025
- Shares
- 1,460
- Price
- $81.45
- Value
- $118,910
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 February 2026 | Shanahan Lauri M Director | Sold | 4,682 | $114.84 | $537,681 |
| 13 February 2026 | Spangenberg Anne President, Fashion Lifestyle | Sold | 4,063 | $116.02 | $471,389 |
| 13 February 2026 | Spring-Green Robin President, Hoka | Sold | 347 | $113.78 | $39,482 |
| 31 October 2025 | Ogbechie Angela Chief Supply Chain Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 1,460 | $81.45 | $118,910 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 22 May 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026 and 3 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
adversely affect our results of operations.
Could happenThe majority of raw materials and components used by our independent manufacturers are sourced from designated suppliers , and tariffs, duties, or other trade restrictions may be imposed, modified, or expanded with limited notice. These measures could require us or our independent manufacturers to seek alternative sourcing options that may not be available in sufficient quantities, at acceptable quality levels, or in a timely manner. Evolving international trade dynamics could materially increase our cost of goods sold, disrupt logistics or inventory flows, adversely affect product pricing and demand, and reduce our gross margin . Customs authorities may also challenge our tariff classifications or treatment of certain products, resulting in additional costs or penalties. In addition, certain tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act have been invalidated by a recent US Supreme Court decision, and additional tariffs may be invalidated, modified, or refunded in the future. As a result, we may face uncertainty regarding the treatment of tariff-related costs, including the potential recovery or refund of tariff amounts previously paid or partially reflected in selective pricing actions or cost-sharing arrangements. These and other judicial, regulatory, or trade policy developments could increase compliance complexity, create cost volatility, impair our ability to plan sourcing, pricing, and inventory strategies, and result in disputes, claims, unrecoverable costs, and reputational harm, regardless of the ultimate outcome.
Read morematerially affect our financial position and results of operations .
Could happenChanges in these tax laws (and our interpretation thereof), could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings. For example, global tax authorities may take differing positions in interpreting the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (commonly known as OECD) guidance, including with respect to Pillar Two model rules, which could modify existing tax principles and increase our tax liabilities; in addition, the enactment of H.R. 1, also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, or similar future legislation, may also affect applicable tax rules and interpretations. These changes and potential other tax law changes could increase our income tax liability or adversely affect our long-term effective tax rates and net income .
Read moreglobally or to retain our customer base, could be materially and adversely affected.
Could happenOur success may depend on the continued effectiveness of third‑party digital platforms and marketplaces, which may change algorithms, policies, fee structures, data access, or content moderation practices, including through increased use of AI ‑driven tools, in ways that reduce traffic, increase customer acquisition costs, or otherwise diminish the effectiveness of our marketing and sales efforts. These platforms may also become subject to regulatory actions that limit our ability to operate on them or require costly operational or technological changes.
Read moreeffectively or in a timely manner, our competitive position and results of operations could be adversely
Could happenIn particular, our HOKA brand maintains its competitiveness through continuous product innovation and timely introduction of new features and technologies that align with current and emerging consumer expectations, including our ability to bring such innovations to market ahead of or in line with competitors. Also, we continue to invest in research and development to increasingly incorporate recycled, renewable, regenerated, and certified/ natural materials ( preferred materials ) in our products as part of our sustainability efforts. We also increasingly use preferred synthetics, regenerated or synthetic cellulosic fibers, and plant fibers. Although we continue to refine our materials and develop new properties for specific applications, if we fail to introduce technical innovation in our products in a timely or commercially successful manner, or experience issues with the quality of our products or materials, consumer demand for our products could decline and we may experience reputational damage. In addition, if our competitors introduce superior or more cost-effective innovations, we may lose market share or be required to increase promotional activity to remain competitive. Further, as our brands transition to suppliers with preferred materials , we may be subject to increased costs or supply constraints, which could reduce our sales and profitability and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our investments in research and development and new materials may not result in commercially successful products or may not generate the expected return on investment, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Read morereputation, results of operations, or financial condition.
Could happenOur use of AI , and the use of AI by third parties on which we rely, may introduce additional risks related to the integrity, security, and governance of data used by such technologies, including the potential for unauthorized use, processing, or exposure of sensitive information in ways that may not be fully addressed by our existing data protection controls, as well as operational disruptions resulting from reliance on AI -driven outputs or systems that do not perform as intended. In addition, the use of AI technologies in the creation or development of content, designs, or other intellectual property may present uncertainty regarding ownership, copyright-ability, or potential infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. The legal and regulatory landscape governing AI is rapidly Table of Contents 24 evolving, and compliance with new or changing requirements may require additional resources or operational changes. If we are unable to effectively manage these risks, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.