DiamondRock Hospitality
DRH on Nasdaq. DiamondRock Hospitality owns hotels and rents rooms to travelers. Market value $2.5bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
The company doesn't report operating profit, so we work it out from pre-tax profit and interest.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $6.45 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 16.3 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 4 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 84 of 100. Price score: 92 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$12.38 a share, 66% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $7.48 to $13.79.
Dividend: 3.0% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Payouts have jumped around in recent years, so this may not repeat.
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $567m | $1.0bn | $1.1bn | $1.1bn | $1.1bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | -27.3% | 15.0% | 14.1% | 10.2% | 14.6% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.21bn | 0.21bn | 0.21bn | 0.20bn | 0.20bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive4 of 4 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 7 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.78× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 30.2% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 2% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $318 million last quarter, up 4% on a year ago.
- Profit: $90 million, up 122% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $163 million, up from $152 million.
- 1% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $993 million more than cash, up from $968 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 3 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $285m |
| December 2024 | $279m |
| March 2025 | $255m |
| June 2025 | $306m |
| September 2025 | $285m |
| December 2025 | $275m |
| March 2026 | $258m |
| June 2026 | $318m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $26m |
| December 2024 | -$11m |
| March 2025 | $12m |
| June 2025 | $41m |
| September 2025 | $23m |
| December 2025 | $26m |
| March 2026 | $14m |
| June 2026 | $90m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 27 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 29 October 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 4 last quarter. 322 funds in all.
- Pzena Investment ManagementRichard Pzena
- Value
- $34m
- Share of fund
- 0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pzena Investment ManagementRichard Pzena | $34m | 0.1% | |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $9m | <0.1% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $8m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $234,903 | <0.1% | New |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $140,326 | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$475mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$296mAdded
- State Street$149m
- Bank of America$130mAdded
- Cohen & Steers$115mCut
- Vanguard Capital Management$112m
- Centersquare Investment Management$88mAdded
- Alyeska Investment Group, L.P.$76mCut
- Geode Capital Management$76mAdded
- UBS Group AG$58mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor17.4%Since 31 March 2025
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor11.2%Since 30 January 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 17.4% | 31 March 2025 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 11.2% | 30 January 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $5,580 of shares on the open market. 3 sold $486,520.
- Lepori StephanieDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 July 2026
- Shares
- 111
- Price
- $12.08
- Value
- $1,346
- Merrill KathleenDirectorSold
- Date
- 12 June 2026
- Shares
- 20,000
- Price
- $11.88
- Value
- $237,600
- Hartmeier Michael A.DirectorSold
- Date
- 13 May 2026
- Shares
- 20,000
- Price
- $10.46
- Value
- $209,200
- Lepori StephanieDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 April 2026
- Shares
- 131
- Price
- $10.17
- Value
- $1,335
- Spierto SteveSVP, Chief Accounting OfficerSold
- Date
- 3 March 2026
- Shares
- 4,000
- Price
- $9.93
- Value
- $39,720
- Lepori StephanieDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 January 2026
- Shares
- 188
- Price
- $9.26
- Value
- $1,740
- Lepori StephanieDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 October 2025
- Shares
- 154
- Price
- $7.51
- Value
- $1,159
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 July 2026 | Lepori Stephanie Director | Bought | 111 | $12.08 | $1,346 |
| 12 June 2026 | Merrill Kathleen Director | Sold | 20,000 | $11.88 | $237,600 |
| 13 May 2026 | Hartmeier Michael A. Director | Sold | 20,000 | $10.46 | $209,200 |
| 14 April 2026 | Lepori Stephanie Director | Bought | 131 | $10.17 | $1,335 |
| 3 March 2026 | Spierto Steve SVP, Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 4,000 | $9.93 | $39,720 |
| 14 January 2026 | Lepori Stephanie Director | Bought | 188 | $9.26 | $1,740 |
| 14 October 2025 | Lepori Stephanie Director | Bought | 154 | $7.51 | $1,159 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 27 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our use of or failure to adopt advancements in information technology, such as artificial intelligence, may hinder or prevent us from achieving strategic objectives or otherwise harm our business.
Could happenOur vendors may use AI tools in their products or services without our knowledge, and the providers of these tools may not meet the evolving regulatory or industry standards for privacy and data protection. Consequently, this may inhibit our vendors' ability to uphold an appropriate level of service, security, or data privacy. If we, our vendors, or other third parties with which we conduct business experience an actual or perceived cybersecurity incident due to the use of AI, we may be adversely impacted, lose valuable intellectual property or confidential information, and incur harm to our reputation and the public perception of the effectiveness of our cybersecurity measures.
Read moreIf any third-party hotel managers do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors” or if our hotels are not “qualified lodging facilities,” we will fail to qualify as a REIT.
Could happenFinally, each property with respect to which our TRS lessees pay rent must be a “qualified lodging facility.” A “qualified lodging facility” is a hotel, motel, or other establishment in which more than one-half of the dwelling units are used on a transient basis, including customary amenities and facilities, provided that no wagering activities are conducted at or in connection with such facility by any person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers and who is legally authorized to engage in such business at or in connection with such facility. We believe that the properties that are leased to our TRS lessees are qualified lodging facilities. Although we intend to monitor future acquisitions and improvements of properties, REIT provisions of the Code provide no or only limited guidance for making determinations under the requirements for qualified lodging facilities, and there can be no assurance that these requirements will be satisfied.
Read moreWe cannot assure you that we will remain qualified as a REIT.
Could happen-23- We believe that we are qualified to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2025, and we expect to continue to qualify as a REIT for future taxable years, but we cannot assure you that we have qualified, or will remain qualified, as a REIT. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and official interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Certain aspects of our REIT qualification are beyond our control. Additionally, although we generally do not directly employ or manage employees at our hotels, and our third-party managers are responsible for hiring, supervising and managing the labor force at our hotels, recent legislative proposals introduced in certain states and local jurisdictions have included provisions requiring that hotel owners be deemed an employer of workers at our hotels. Changes in laws or regulations relating to the employer relationship that result in a determination that we are a “joint employer” with our hotel operators could subject us to liability for employment-related and other liabilities of our hotel operators and could cause us to incur other costs that have a material adverse effect on our business (including our qualification for taxation as a REIT), financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreOur use of or failure to adopt advancements in information technology, such as artificial intelligence, may hinder or prevent us from achieving strategic objectives or otherwise harm our business.
Could happen-20- Our use of or inability to safely and effectively adopt and deliver new technological capabilities and enhancements in line with strategic objectives (or the use or failure to adopt by our hotel managers), including artificial intelligence ("AI"), may put us at a competitive disadvantage, including by failing to achieve efficiencies achieved by our competitors, or by misusing such technologies in ways that result in operational disruptions, reputation damage or legal liability exposure. Our use of AI tools will subject us to risks, including inaccurate or otherwise flawed results that are not easily detectable, misappropriation of intellectual property which may expose us to legal liability, and confidentiality, data privacy, and cybersecurity risks. Although we implement measures designed to help mitigate these risks, such measures may not always be successful.
Read moreActions by federal, state or local jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Could happenAdditionally, although we do not directly employ or manage employees at our hotels, and our third-party managers are responsible for hiring, supervising and managing the labor force at our hotels, recent legislative proposals introduced in certain states and local jurisdictions have included provisions requiring that hotel owners be deemed an employer of workers at our hotels. Changes in laws or regulations relating to the employer relationship that result in a determination that we are a “joint employer” with our hotel operators could subject us to liability for employment-related and other liabilities of our hotel operators and could cause us to incur other costs that have a material adverse effect on our business (including our qualification for taxation as a REIT), financial condition and results of operations.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.