Eagle Bancorp Montana
EBMT on Nasdaq. State commercial banks. Market value $167m.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Look carefully before going further
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Read the warning sign in its own filings
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 7 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $0.85.
Profit per $100 you pay: $9.58.
Quality score: 70 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$21.05 a share, 33% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $15.80 to $24.66.
Dividend: 2.7% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $4 million, up 15% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $19 million, up from $13 million.
- 1% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $3m |
| December 2024 | $3m |
| March 2025 | $3m |
| June 2025 | $3m |
| September 2025 | $4m |
| December 2025 | $5m |
| March 2026 | $4m |
| June 2026 | $4m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 9 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 4 November 2026
Who owns it
1 long-term investor we follow owns it, down from 2 last quarter. 103 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $478,600 | <0.1% | Cut |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$16mAdded
- Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, the$9m
- Vanguard Capital Management$8mCut
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$7mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$4mAdded
- American Century Companies$4mAdded
- Acadian Asset Management$3mAdded
- Renaissance Technologies$3mAdded
- O'shaughnessy Asset Management$3mAdded
- State Street$3mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor6.2%Since 30 June 2026
- Manulife Investment Management (US) LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- Brandes Investment PartnersPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- Fourthstone LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 6.2% | 30 June 2026 | |
Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
Brandes Investment Partners Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
Fourthstone LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $10,050 of shares on the open market. 4 sold $721,080.
- Walsh Kenneth MDirectorSold
- Date
- 8 May 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $22.83
- Value
- $228,300
- Waters SamuelDirectorSold
- Date
- 20 February 2026
- Shares
- 2,100
- Price
- $22.48
- Value
- $47,208
- MCCARVEL THOMAS JDirectorSold
- Date
- 17 February 2026
- Shares
- 1,182
- Price
- $22.77
- Value
- $26,914
- JOHNSON PETER JOSEPHDirectorSold
- Date
- 11 February 2026
- Shares
- 3,355
- Price
- $23.11
- Value
- $77,534
- JOHNSON PETER JOSEPHDirectorSold
- Date
- 10 February 2026
- Shares
- 4,192
- Price
- $23.06
- Value
- $96,660
- Walsh Kenneth MDirectorSold
- Date
- 3 February 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $22.47
- Value
- $224,700
- O'Neill Mark ASVP-Chief Lending OfficerBought
- Date
- 25 November 2025
- Shares
- 600
- Price
- $16.75
- Value
- $10,050
- MCCARVEL THOMAS JDirectorSold
- Date
- 21 November 2025
- Shares
- 1,200
- Price
- $16.47
- Value
- $19,764
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May 2026 | Walsh Kenneth M Director | Sold | 10,000 | $22.83 | $228,300 |
| 20 February 2026 | Waters Samuel Director | Sold | 2,100 | $22.48 | $47,208 |
| 17 February 2026 | MCCARVEL THOMAS J Director | Sold | 1,182 | $22.77 | $26,914 |
| 11 February 2026 | JOHNSON PETER JOSEPH Director | Sold | 3,355 | $23.11 | $77,534 |
| 10 February 2026 | JOHNSON PETER JOSEPH Director | Sold | 4,192 | $23.06 | $96,660 |
| 3 February 2026 | Walsh Kenneth M Director | Sold | 10,000 | $22.47 | $224,700 |
| 25 November 2025 | O'Neill Mark A SVP-Chief Lending Officer | Bought | 600 | $16.75 | $10,050 |
| 21 November 2025 | MCCARVEL THOMAS J Director | Sold | 1,200 | $16.47 | $19,764 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
1 serious warning sign in Eagle Bancorp Montana’s filings.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 9 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 5 Aug 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
Its past accounts can't be relied on
SeriousIt told the SEC its earlier accounts should no longer be relied on, usually because they contained errors.
8-K Item 4.02 filed 14 Mar 2025: the company said its earlier financial statements should no longer be relied on.
From an 8-K filed 14 March 2025: Previously issued accounts should no longer be relied on. Open the filing
Changed auditor
Worth knowingThe company changed its auditor (the firm that checks its books) in the last two years.
“The dismissal of Baker Tilly and the appointment of Plante Moran will become effective upon the issuance by Baker Tilly of its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025”
From an 8-K filed 30 July 2025: Change of auditor. Read it in the filing
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third‑party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients or counterparties, or other third parties.
Could happenOur adoption of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze or generate data or other materials or content (collectively, “AI”), for limited internal use has increased our efficiency, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third‑party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings faster than we are able to do so independently. There are significant risks involved in utilizing AI and no assurance can be provided that our or our third‑party vendors’ or service providers’ use of AI will enhance our or our third‑party vendors’ or service providers’ products or services or produce the intended results. The adoption and incorporation of such tools can lead to concerns around safety and soundness, fair access to financial services, fair treatment of consumers and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Such risk can result from models being poorly designed or faulty data being used, inadequate model testing or validation, narrow or limited human oversight, inadequate planning or due diligence, or inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers or end‑users, and other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI and the acceptance of AI solutions. Furthermore, given the pace of rapid adoption of such tools by vendors and service providers, we may not be aware of the adoption of AI solutions prior to such tools being introduced into our environment. Failure to adequately manage AI risks can result in erroneous results and decisions based on misinformation, unwanted forms of bias, unauthorized access to sensitive, confidential, proprietary or personal information and violations of applicable laws and regulations, leading to operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, reputational harm, ethical challenges, legal liability, losses, fines and other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. If we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which the AI tools we use rely, or to use the output of such AI tools, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third‑party intellectual property, privacy or other rights or contracts to which we are a party.
Read moreConsumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.
Could happenCompetition with financial‑services technology companies, including those related to digital currencies or cryptocurrencies (including stablecoins), or technology companies partnering with financial‑services companies, may be particularly intense, due to, among other things, differing regulatory environments. For example, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act of 2025 ("GENIUS Act") provides a legal framework for stablecoins to be issued in the United States, which may lead to new and increased competition for funds that may have otherwise been, or currently are, deposits with banks, such as the Bank.
Read moreThe adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third‑party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients or counterparties, or other third parties.
Could happenIn addition, regulation of AI is rapidly evolving as federal and state legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including intellectual property, data privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition, equal opportunity and fair lending laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or new applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and various U.S. states are applying, or are considering applying, existing laws and regulations to AI or are considering general legal frameworks for AI. We may not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly evolving frameworks, and we may need to expend resources to adjust our operations or offerings. Moreover, because AI technology itself is highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all of the legal, operational or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI.
Read moreNatural disasters, geopolitical events, public health crises and other catastrophic events beyond our control could adversely affect us.
Could happenNatural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, tornados, wildfires, extreme weather conditions and other acts of nature, geopolitical events such as the recent military actions in Iran and the Middle East, those involving civil unrest, changes in government regimes, terrorism or military conflict, pandemics and other public health crises, and other catastrophic events could adversely affect our business operations and those of our customers, counterparties and service providers, and cause substantial damage and loss to real and personal property, including damage to or destruction of mortgaged properties or our own banking facilities and offices. Natural disasters, geopolitical events, public health crises and other catastrophic events, or concerns about the occurrence of any such events, could impair our borrowers’ ability to service their loans, decrease the level and duration of deposits by customers, erode the value of loan collateral, including mortgaged properties, result in an increase in the amount of our non‑performing loans and a higher level of non‑performing assets, including real estate owned, net charge‑offs and provision for loan losses, lead to other operational difficulties and impair our ability to manage our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the value of our common stock. We also could be adversely affected if our key personnel or a significant number of our employees were to become unavailable due to a public health crisis (such as an outbreak of a contagious disease), natural disaster, war, act of terrorism, accident or other reason. Additionally, financial markets may be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, acts of terrorism or other geopolitical events.
Read moreEagle uses models for business planning purposes that may not adequately predict future results.
Could happenAlso, information Eagle provides to the public or to its regulators based on models could be inaccurate or misleading due to inadequate design or implementation. Decisions that its regulators make, including those related to capital distributions to its shareholders, could be affected adversely due to the perception that the models used to generate the relevant information are unreliable or inadequate.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.