First Business Financial Services
FBIZ on Nasdaq. First Business Financial Services sells bank accounts and loans to businesses and individuals. Market value $591m.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 14 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.50.
Profit per $100 you pay: $9.39.
Quality score: 98 of 100. Price score: 87 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$70.64 a share, 53% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $46.07 to $73.74.
Dividend: 1.6% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $16 million, up 36% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $81 million, up from $63 million.
- 1% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $11m |
| December 2024 | $14m |
| March 2025 | $11m |
| June 2025 | $11m |
| September 2025 | $14m |
| December 2025 | $13m |
| March 2026 | $12m |
| June 2026 | $16m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 25 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 30 October 2026
Who owns it
1 long-term investor we follow owns it, unchanged from 1 last quarter. 142 funds in all.
- LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok
- Value
- $9m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $9m | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$59mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$31m
- Vanguard Capital Management$22m
- First Business Financial Services$21mCut
- American Century Companies$17mAdded
- Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, the$15m
- Geode Capital Management$14mAdded
- State Street$12mAdded
- Banc Funds$10m
- Cutler Capital Management$10m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor6.1%Since 31 March 2025
- BlackRock Portfolio Management LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 6.1% | 31 March 2025 | |
BlackRock Portfolio Management LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $3,649 of shares on the open market. 1 sold $47,381.
- Chandler Jodi AChief Human Resources OfficerSold
- Date
- 27 August 2026
- Shares
- 675
- Price
- $70.19
- Value
- $47,381
- Crampton Kevin DChief Accounting OfficerBought
- Date
- 7 November 2025
- Shares
- 71
- Price
- $51.40
- Value
- $3,649
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 August 2026 | Chandler Jodi A Chief Human Resources Officer | Sold | 675 | $70.19 | $47,381 |
| 7 November 2025 | Crampton Kevin D Chief Accounting Officer | Bought | 71 | $51.40 | $3,649 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 25 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 31 Jul 2026 and 9 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.
Could happenOur adoption of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze, or generate data or other materials or content (collectively, “AI”), is currently evolving and is being implemented on a measured basis for internal use, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third-party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings. There are inherent risks involved in utilizing AI and no assurance can be provided that our or our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ use of AI will enhance our or our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ products or services or produce the intended results. The adoption and incorporation of such tools can lead to concerns around safety and soundness, fair access to financial services, fair treatment of employees or consumers, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Such risks can result from models being poorly designed or faulty data being used, inadequate model testing or validation, narrow or limited human oversight, inadequate planning or due diligence, inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers or end-users, and other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI and the acceptance of AI solutions. Furthermore, given the pace of rapid adoption of such tools by vendors and service providers, we may not be aware of the addition of AI solutions prior to such tools being introduced into our environment. Failure to adequately manage AI risks can result in erroneous results and decisions made by misinformation, unwanted forms of bias, unauthorized access to sensitive, confidential, proprietary, or personal information, and violations of applicable laws and regulations, leading to operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, reputational harm, ethical challenges, legal liability, losses, fines, and other adverse impacts on our business and financial results.
Read moreThe adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors,…
Could happenThe adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.
The proportion of the Corporation’s deposit account balances that exceed FDIC insurance limits may expose the Bank to enhanced liquidity risk.
Could happenFederal banking agencies have concluded that the proportion of the deposits that exceeded FDIC insurance limits was a significant factor in the failure of several banking institutions in the first half of 2023. Advances in digital banking and payment technologies, as well as increased access to real-time information, have heightened regulators’ focus on the potential speed and magnitude of deposit outflows. These advances may also enable depositors to withdraw funds more rapidly than in the past. In response to the 2023 bank failures, many large depositors across the industry withdrew deposits in excess of applicable deposit insurance limits and deposited these funds in other financial institutions and low-risk securities accounts in an effort to mitigate the risk of potential bank failures. The Bank did not experience significant withdrawal activity in connection with the 2023 bank failures. If a significant portion of the Bank’s deposits were to be withdrawn within a short period of time in connection with a similar, future crisis, additional sources of funding may be required to meet withdrawal demands and these funding sources may have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s net interest margin. Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our expenses, pay dividends to our shareholders, or fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Read moreInformation security risks for financial institutions like us continue to increase in part because of new technologies, the increased use…
Could happenInformation security risks for financial institutions like us continue to increase in part because of new technologies, the increased use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices and cloud computing) to conduct financial and other business transactions, political activism, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, terrorist, hackers, and perpetrators of fraud. A successful cyber-attack or other breach of our information systems could adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition or results of operations and damage its reputation.
Read moreOur financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to effectively execute our strategic plan or…
Could happenOur financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to effectively execute our strategic plan or manage the growth called for in our strategic plan.
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.