First Citizens Bancshares
FCNCA on Nasdaq. First Citizens Bancshares sells bank accounts, loans, and financial services to people and businesses. Market value $17.3bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 13 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.24.
Profit per $100 you pay: $8.67.
Quality score: 95 of 100. Price score: 94 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$2,088.13 a share, 29% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $1,623.76 to $2,296.30.
Dividend: 0.6% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Payouts have jumped around in recent years, so this may not repeat.
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | $5.1bn | $18.8bn | $9.8bn | $9.5bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.01bn | 0.02bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 23.4% a year
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 32% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $2.4 billion last quarter, about the same as a year ago.
- Profit: $672 million, up 17% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $2.5 billion, down from $2.6 billion.
- 13% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 3 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $2.4bn |
| December 2024 | $2.4bn |
| March 2025 | $2.3bn |
| June 2025 | $2.4bn |
| September 2025 | $2.4bn |
| December 2025 | $2.4bn |
| March 2026 | $2.3bn |
| June 2026 | $2.4bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $639m |
| December 2024 | $700m |
| March 2025 | $483m |
| June 2025 | $575m |
| September 2025 | $568m |
| December 2025 | $580m |
| March 2026 | $534m |
| June 2026 | $672m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 24 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 6 November 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 5 last quarter. 625 funds in all.
- Saber Capital ManagementJohn Huber
- Value
- $13m
- Share of fund
- 9.5%
- Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt
- Value
- $374,542
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Associates (Oakmark)Bill Nygren | $1.9bn | 2.5% | Cut |
| Dodge & CoxDodge & Cox investment committee | $841m | 0.4% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $322m | 0.9% | Added |
| Saber Capital ManagementJohn Huber | $13m | 9.5% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $374,542 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- Harris Associates (Oakmark)$1.9bnCut
- BlackRock$1.8bnCut
- Dodge & Cox$841mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$746mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$650mCut
- State Street$433mCut
- JPMorgan Chase$384mCut
- Geode Capital Management$357mCut
- Hotchkis & Wiley$322mAdded
- Coatue Management$290m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- Olivia B. HoldingInsider or founderat least 8.9%+0.3 pts(filed with 4 related holders)Since 7 August 2026
What they said
Frank B. Holding, Jr., Hope H. Bryant, and Claire H. Bristow's spouse, Peter M. Bristow, serve as executive officers and directors of the Issuer and, therefore, participate with the Issuer's management and Board of Directors in making policy and considering and taking action on…
Read the filing - Harris Associates (Oakmark)Passive investorat least 8.1%+2.8 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 December 2025
- Lewis R. Holding IIInsider or founder6.0%Since 22 December 2025
What they said
Frank B. Holding, Jr., Hope H. Bryant, and Claire H. Bristow's spouse, Peter M. Bristow, serve as executive officers and directors of the Issuer and, therefore, participate with the Issuer's management and Board of Directors in making policy and considering and taking action on…
Read the filing - BlackRock, Inc.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- BlackRock Portfolio Management LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- Capital Research Global InvestorsPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Olivia B. Holding Insider or founder | at least 8.9%+0.3 pts (filed with 4 related holders) | 7 August 2026 | What they saidFrank B. Holding, Jr., Hope H. Bryant, and Claire H. Bristow's spouse, Peter M. Bristow, serve as executive officers and directors of the Issuer and, therefore, participate with the Issuer's management and Board of Directors in making policy and considering and taking action on… Read the filing |
Harris Associates (Oakmark) Passive investor | at least 8.1%+2.8 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 December 2025 | |
Lewis R. Holding II Insider or founder | 6.0% | 22 December 2025 | What they saidFrank B. Holding, Jr., Hope H. Bryant, and Claire H. Bristow's spouse, Peter M. Bristow, serve as executive officers and directors of the Issuer and, therefore, participate with the Issuer's management and Board of Directors in making policy and considering and taking action on… Read the filing |
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
BlackRock Portfolio Management LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
Capital Research Global Investors Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 4 insiders bought $14m of shares on the open market. 2 sold $15m.
- Morais Diane E.DirectorBought
- Date
- 19 August 2026
- Shares
- 50
- Price
- $2168.11
- Value
- $108,405
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 5 June 2026
- Shares
- 137
- Price
- $2018.73
- Value
- $276,566
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 5 June 2026
- Shares
- 335
- Price
- $1920.80
- Value
- $643,467
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 5 June 2026
- Shares
- 528
- Price
- $1813.37
- Value
- $957,461
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 4 June 2026
- Shares
- 25
- Price
- $1794.99
- Value
- $44,875
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 4 June 2026
- Shares
- 225
- Price
- $1751.95
- Value
- $394,189
- Alemany Ellen RDirectorSold
- Date
- 4 June 2026
- Shares
- 2,520
- Price
- $2047.12
- Value
- $5m
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 12 May 2026
- Shares
- 5,346
- Price
- $1918.69
- Value
- $10m
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 12 May 2026
- Shares
- 5,940
- Price
- $1726.82
- Value
- $10m
- HOLDING FRANK B JRChairman and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 19 March 2026
- Shares
- 96
- Price
- $1550.00
- Value
- $148,800
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 August 2026 | Morais Diane E. Director | Bought | 50 | $2168.11 | $108,405 |
| 5 June 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 137 | $2018.73 | $276,566 |
| 5 June 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 335 | $1920.80 | $643,467 |
| 5 June 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 528 | $1813.37 | $957,461 |
| 4 June 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 25 | $1794.99 | $44,875 |
| 4 June 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 225 | $1751.95 | $394,189 |
| 4 June 2026 | Alemany Ellen R Director | Sold | 2,520 | $2047.12 | $5m |
| 12 May 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 5,346 | $1918.69 | $10m |
| 12 May 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 5,940 | $1726.82 | $10m |
| 19 March 2026 | HOLDING FRANK B JR Chairman and CEO, Director | Bought | 96 | $1550.00 | $148,800 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 24 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 7 Aug 2026 and 6 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Failure to adopt new technologies that match consumer preferences or to keep pace with or effectively implement technological changes could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenThe use of AI presents its own unique risks. Third-party development of AI models introduces risks related to how those models are developed, trained, and deployed, including unauthorized material in training data and limited visibility into risk mitigation steps. The legal and regulatory environment for AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, both in the United States and internationally, potentially increasing compliance costs and risk of non-compliance. We are also exposed to the risk that generative AI models may produce incorrect outputs, release confidential information, reflect biases, infringe intellectual property, or otherwise cause harm. Their complexity makes it challenging to understand outputs and comply with documentation or explanation requirements. Crypto-asset related activities also present unique risks, including market and liquidity risk, operational and cybersecurity risks, consumer protection requirements and AML requirements. Refer to Item 1. Business—Regulatory Considerations—Artificial Intelligence and —Crypto-Asset Related Activities for additional information. Failure to adopt new technologies that match consumer preferences or a failure to keep pace with or effectively implement technological changes could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Read moreOur concentration of loans and leases in certain industries increases the risk of losses and could impair our earnings if these industries experience economic difficulties.
Could happenOur loans and leases include concentrations in non-depository financial institutions (“NDFIs”) and the healthcare and technology industries. Although we believe our aggregate loan and lease portfolio is diversified, borrowers in certain industries may have a heightened vulnerability to negative economic conditions. For example, NDFIs may be subject to a less stringent regulatory environment than IDIs or BHCs, which could enable NDFIs that make loans to be less risk-sensitive in their lending which could increase the risk of default on loans NDFIs make and, consequently, the loans we make to NDFIs. There has also been recent focus on the private credit regulatory environment. An increase in regulations applicable to NDFIs could have an adverse affect on their profitability or ability to pay financial obligations, including loans payable to FCB.
Read moreChanges in domestic and foreign trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Could happenThe U.S. government announced changes to its trade policies in 2025 and significantly increased tariffs on certain imports under emergency authorities, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). In February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The current tariff environment remains dynamic and uncertain, including regarding potential refunds of tariffs paid under IEEPA, and the U.S. government could respond with replacement measures under other legal authorities. Replacement measures and changes to tariffs and other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and volatility in U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions which could cause adverse changes in the availability, terms and cost of capital. Additionally, potential tariffs or other U.S. trade policy measures have triggered and may trigger additional retaliatory actions by other countries such as China. Increased tariffs and trade restrictions may cause the prices of our customers’ products to increase, which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce our customers’ margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results, and ability to service debt, which in turn, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreThe Trump administration has proposed or implemented significant changes to the size and scope of the federal government, including reductions in program or agency funding or workforce, and may continue to do so.
Could happenThe Trump administration has proposed or implemented significant changes to the size and scope of the federal government and may continue to do so. In addition to changes in policy direction, these have included challenges to agency independence as well as agency reorganizations, alteration of government payment systems, leadership and personnel changes, and reductions in program or agency funding or workforce, including workforce reductions at federal banking agencies and the CFPB. These changes may have differing impacts on the economy as a whole or different regions or segments of the economy or asset classes which are difficult to predict at this time. These changes could also result in increased uncertainty and compliance costs if we become subject to additional state and local laws in absence of comprehensive federal oversight or the changes are reversed or limited by judicial challenge or a later executive administration. Accordingly, it is possible that such changes may be materially adverse to our customers, business, financial condition and results of operation.
Read more▪ Consumers may increasingly decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could have a material adverse impact…
Could happen▪ Consumers may increasingly decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operations.
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.