Five Star Bancorp
FSBC on Nasdaq. Five Star Bancorp sells banking services to small businesses and individuals in Northern California. Market value $1.1bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 16 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $2.24.
Profit per $100 you pay: $6.77.
Quality score: 100 of 100. Price score: 61 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$43.32 a share, 41% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $30.68 to $50.26.
Dividend: 1.6% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.02bn | 0.02bn | 0.02bn | 0.02bn | 0.02bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 42% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $19 million, up 34% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $80 million, up from $68 million.
- About the same number of shares as a year ago.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $11m |
| December 2024 | $13m |
| March 2025 | $13m |
| June 2025 | $15m |
| September 2025 | $16m |
| December 2025 | $18m |
| March 2026 | $19m |
| June 2026 | $19m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 27 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 5 November 2026
Who owns it
1 long-term investor we follow owns it, unchanged from 1 last quarter. 167 funds in all.
- Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team
- Value
- $8m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $8m | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- T. Rowe Price Investment Management$100m
- Davis Asset Management, L.P.$74m
- BlackRock$65mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$32m
- American Century Companies$26mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$23mAdded
- Captrust Financial Advisors$23m
- Franklin Resources$21mCut
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$19mAdded
- State Street$18mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
2 investors own more than 5%.
- Davis Partnership, L.P.Passive investorat least 7.1%(filed with 3 related holders)Since 31 December 2024
- Oates-Fairrington Kathryn RuthPassive investorat least 6.0%(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 December 2024
- Oates Administrative TrustPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 December 2024
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Davis Partnership, L.P. Passive investor | at least 7.1% (filed with 3 related holders) | 31 December 2024 | |
Oates-Fairrington Kathryn Ruth Passive investor | at least 6.0% (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 December 2024 | |
Oates Administrative Trust Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 December 2024 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 6 insiders bought $6m of shares on the open market. 5 sold $846,820.
- Allbaugh Larry EugeneDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 July 2026
- Shares
- 96,591
- Price
- $44.00
- Value
- $4m
- Perry-Smith Robert TruxtunDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 July 2026
- Shares
- 31,363
- Price
- $44.00
- Value
- $1m
- Deary-Bell ShannonDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 July 2026
- Shares
- 5,682
- Price
- $44.00
- Value
- $250,008
- Lucas DonnaDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 July 2026
- Shares
- 1,136
- Price
- $44.00
- Value
- $49,984
- Riggs Judson TeichertDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 July 2026
- Shares
- 2,273
- Price
- $44.00
- Value
- $100,012
- Ramos Kevin FrancisDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 July 2026
- Shares
- 5,682
- Price
- $44.00
- Value
- $250,008
- Wait Brett LeviSVP, Chief Information OfficerSold
- Date
- 26 May 2026
- Shares
- 1,640
- Price
- $42.27
- Value
- $69,323
- Lee Michael EugeneSVP, Chief Regulatory OfficerSold
- Date
- 21 May 2026
- Shares
- 867
- Price
- $41.23
- Value
- $35,746
- Beckwith James EugenePresident & CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 20 May 2026
- Shares
- 6,428
- Price
- $41.23
- Value
- $265,054
- Wait Brett LeviSVP & CIOSold
- Date
- 14 May 2026
- Shares
- 2,583
- Price
- $41.11
- Value
- $106,187
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 July 2026 | Allbaugh Larry Eugene Director | Bought | 96,591 | $44.00 | $4m |
| 22 July 2026 | Perry-Smith Robert Truxtun Director | Bought | 31,363 | $44.00 | $1m |
| 22 July 2026 | Deary-Bell Shannon Director | Bought | 5,682 | $44.00 | $250,008 |
| 22 July 2026 | Lucas Donna Director | Bought | 1,136 | $44.00 | $49,984 |
| 22 July 2026 | Riggs Judson Teichert Director | Bought | 2,273 | $44.00 | $100,012 |
| 22 July 2026 | Ramos Kevin Francis Director | Bought | 5,682 | $44.00 | $250,008 |
| 26 May 2026 | Wait Brett Levi SVP, Chief Information Officer | Sold | 1,640 | $42.27 | $69,323 |
| 21 May 2026 | Lee Michael Eugene SVP, Chief Regulatory Officer | Sold | 867 | $41.23 | $35,746 |
| 20 May 2026 | Beckwith James Eugene President & CEO, Director | Sold | 6,428 | $41.23 | $265,054 |
| 14 May 2026 | Wait Brett Levi SVP & CIO | Sold | 2,583 | $41.11 | $106,187 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 27 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 10 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.
Could happenOur adoption of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze, or generate data or other materials or content (collectively, “AI”), for limited internal use has increased our efficiency, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third-party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings faster than we are able to do so independently. There are significant risks involved in utilizing AI and no assurance can be provided that our or our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ use of AI will enhance our or our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ products or services or produce the intended results. The adoption and incorporation of such tools can lead to concerns around safety and soundness, fair access to financial services, fair treatment of consumers, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Such risk can result from models being poorly designed or faulty data being used, inadequate model testing or validation, narrow or limited human oversight, inadequate planning or due diligence, inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers or end-users, and other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI and the acceptance of AI solutions. Furthermore, given the pace of rapid adoption of such tools by vendors and service providers, we may not be aware of the addition of AI solutions prior to such tools being introduced into our environment. Failure to adequately manage AI risks can result in erroneous results and decisions made by misinformation, unwanted forms of bias, unauthorized access to sensitive, confidential, proprietary or personal information, and violations of applicable laws and regulations, leading to operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, reputational harm, ethical challenges, legal liability, losses, fines, and other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. If we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which the AI tools we use rely, or to use the output of such AI tools, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy, or other rights or contracts to which we are a party.
Read moreThe adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.
Could happenIn addition, regulation of AI is rapidly evolving as federal and state legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, intellectual property, data privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition, equal opportunity and fair lending laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or new applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and various U.S. states are applying, or are considering applying, existing laws and regulations to AI or are considering general legal frameworks for AI. We may not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly evolving frameworks, and we may need to expend resources to adjust our operations or offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks are inconsistent across jurisdictions. Moreover, because AI technology itself is highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all of the legal, operational, or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI.
Read moreWe could be subject to changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations or challenges to our income tax provision.
Could happenWe compute our income tax provision based on enacted tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Any change in enacted tax laws, rules, or regulatory or judicial interpretations, or any change in the pronouncements relating to accounting for income taxes, could adversely affect our effective tax rate, tax payments, and results of operations. For example, on July 4, 2025, the President signed H.R. 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” into law. The legislation includes several changes to federal tax law that generally allow for more favorable deductibility of certain business expenses beginning in 2025, including the restoration of immediate expensing of domestic R&D expenditures, reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation, and more favorable rules for determining the limitation on business interest expense. The Act also made certain changes to the deductibility of the cost of meals and charitable contributions that are effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025. The Company evaluated the impact on future periods and the legislation is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Additionally, the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our tax positions, which could increase our effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations. We are subject to audit and review by U.S. federal and state tax authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, changes in enacted tax laws, such as adoption of a lower income tax rate in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate, could impact our ability to obtain the future tax benefits represented by our deferred tax assets. Also, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other liabilities requires significant judgment by management. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.
Read moreInflation can have an adverse impact on our business and on our customers.
Could happenInflation results in the value of assets or income from investments being worth less in the future due to a decrease in the value of money. Interest rates are likely to be higher during periods of elevated inflation and, together, these factors typically cause the value of our investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, to decrease, although this effect is less pronounced for floating rate instruments than for fixed-rate instruments. Prolonged periods of inflation also may impact our profitability by negatively impacting our costs and expenses, including increasing funding costs and expenses related to talent acquisition and retention, and negatively impacting the demand for our products and services. Moreover, our customers are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of goods and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans. Adverse changes in inflation and interest rates could negatively impact consumer and business confidence, and adversely affect the economy as well as our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.