GE HealthCare Technologies
GEHC on Nasdaq. GE HealthCare sells medical devices, software, and services to hospitals and researchers. Market value $29.7bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $5.40 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 13.7 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 13 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 84 of 100. Price score: 93 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$64.77 a share, 10% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $58.75 to $89.77.
Dividend: 0.2% a year
Paid every year for 3 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||
| Revenue | $19.6bn | $19.7bn | $20.6bn |
| Operating margin | |||
| Operating margin | 12.5% | 13.3% | 13.4% |
| Debt to equity | |||
| Debt to equity | 1.47 | 1.24 | 1.02 |
| Shares outstanding | |||
| Shares outstanding | 0.46bn | 0.46bn | 0.45bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive3 of 3 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)4 of 7 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt1.02× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $5.3 billion last quarter, up 6% on a year ago.
- Profit: $561 million, up 15% on a year ago.
- It keeps 13 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 14 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $1.6 billion, about the same as a year earlier.
- 1% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $8.1 billion more than cash, down from $8.6 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $4.9bn |
| December 2024 | $5.3bn |
| March 2025 | $4.8bn |
| June 2025 | $5.0bn |
| September 2025 | $5.1bn |
| December 2025 | $5.7bn |
| March 2026 | $5.1bn |
| June 2026 | $5.3bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $470m |
| December 2024 | $721m |
| March 2025 | $564m |
| June 2025 | $486m |
| September 2025 | $446m |
| December 2025 | $589m |
| March 2026 | $389m |
| June 2026 | $561m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 28 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 4 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 28 October 2026
Who owns it
18 long-term investors we follow own it, down from 19 last quarter. 1,224 funds in all.
- Harris Associates (Oakmark)Bill Nygren
- Value
- $981m
- Share of fund
- 1.3%
- Boston PartnersBoston Partners team
- Value
- $330m
- Share of fund
- 0.3%
- Semper AugustusChristopher Bloomstran
- Value
- $293,230
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge & CoxDodge & Cox investment committee | $2.4bn | 1.3% | Added |
| Harris Associates (Oakmark)Bill Nygren | $981m | 1.3% | |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $861m | 2.6% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $784m | 2.3% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $330m | 0.3% | |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $223m | 0.4% | Added |
| Trian Fund ManagementNelson Peltz | $197m | 4.7% | Added |
| Leon Cooperman (Omega Family Office)Leon Cooperman | $84m | 2.4% | Added |
| Sound Shore ManagementHarry Burn | $72m | 2.2% | Cut |
| Letko BrosseauLetko Brosseau team | $56m | 0.8% | New |
| First Pacific Advisors (FPA)Steven Romick | $53m | 0.7% | New |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $37m | <0.1% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $26m | <0.1% | Added |
| Eagle Capital ManagementBoykin Curry | $702,190 | <0.1% | Cut |
| Boyar Asset ManagementMark Boyar | $305,314 | 0.2% | Cut |
| Semper AugustusChristopher Bloomstran | $293,230 | <0.1% | |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $249,959 | <0.1% | Cut |
| First Eagle Investment ManagementMatthew McLennan | $31,494 | <0.1% | Added |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- Dodge & Cox$2.4bnAdded
- BlackRock$2.4bnAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$1.9bnAdded
- State Street$1.3bn
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$1.3bnAdded
- Invesco$1.2bnAdded
- Harris Associates (Oakmark)$981m
- Barrow Hanley$861mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$821mAdded
- Hotchkis & Wiley$784mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
2 investors own more than 5%.
- Dodge & CoxPassive investor10.5%+2.2 ptsSince 31 July 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.3%Since 31 March 2026
- Capital Research Global InvestorsPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dodge & Cox Passive investor | 10.5%+2.2 pts | 31 July 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
Capital Research Global Investors Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 8 insiders bought $6m of shares on the open market.
- Lobo KevinDirectorBought
- Date
- 22 May 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $64.18
- Value
- $641,800
- Hochman Rodney FDirectorBought
- Date
- 12 May 2026
- Shares
- 1,618
- Price
- $62.03
- Value
- $100,365
- Yang Watkin Phoebe L.DirectorBought
- Date
- 8 May 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $63.01
- Value
- $63,010
- Stromberg William JDirectorBought
- Date
- 6 May 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $61.69
- Value
- $61,690
- CULP H LAWRENCE JRDirectorBought
- Date
- 6 May 2026
- Shares
- 80,805
- Price
- $61.88
- Value
- $5m
- SACCARO JAMESChief Financial OfficerBought
- Date
- 1 May 2026
- Shares
- 3,310
- Price
- $60.60
- Value
- $200,586
- Jimenez Frank RGC & Corporate SecretaryBought
- Date
- 30 April 2026
- Shares
- 1,750
- Price
- $60.45
- Value
- $105,788
- Arduini Peter JPresident and CEO, DirectorBought
- Date
- 30 April 2026
- Shares
- 4,169
- Price
- $59.93
- Value
- $249,848
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 May 2026 | Lobo Kevin Director | Bought | 10,000 | $64.18 | $641,800 |
| 12 May 2026 | Hochman Rodney F Director | Bought | 1,618 | $62.03 | $100,365 |
| 8 May 2026 | Yang Watkin Phoebe L. Director | Bought | 1,000 | $63.01 | $63,010 |
| 6 May 2026 | Stromberg William J Director | Bought | 1,000 | $61.69 | $61,690 |
| 6 May 2026 | CULP H LAWRENCE JR Director | Bought | 80,805 | $61.88 | $5m |
| 1 May 2026 | SACCARO JAMES Chief Financial Officer | Bought | 3,310 | $60.60 | $200,586 |
| 30 April 2026 | Jimenez Frank R GC & Corporate Secretary | Bought | 1,750 | $60.45 | $105,788 |
| 30 April 2026 | Arduini Peter J President and CEO, Director | Bought | 4,169 | $59.93 | $249,848 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 4 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 29 Jul 2026 and 9 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Increasing attention to sustainability matters, including EH&S matters, may impose additional costs on our business and expose us to new risks.
Could happenWe face increasing attention from investors, regulators, customers, and other stakeholders, who may have conflicting views on our positions, performance, and disclosures relating to sustainability-related matters, and we are subject to legal and regulatory requirements relating to such positions, performance, and disclosures. In addition, sustainability-based customer standards and tender requirements or weighting criteria, in particular in the EU, may impact our ability to compete successfully. These requirements continue to broaden and may be conflicting, both in terms of scope and geography, a trend we expect to continue. If we draw scrutiny for the positions we take or do not take on these matters (or for altering any such position) or receive unfavorable ratings from third-party organizations that provide information to investors on sustainability matters, it could be used by investors, lenders, customers, and employees to inform their investment, financing, purchasing, or employment decisions, which could have a negative impact on our business. Additionally, our processes and controls for reporting of sustainability matters may not always conform with evolving and disparate standards for identifying, measuring, and reporting sustainability metrics, and such standards may change over time, which could result in significant revisions to our performance metrics, goals, or reported progress in achieving our goals. Furthermore, a failure to adequately meet regulatory expectations may result in non-compliance, the loss of business and reputational impacts, and our becoming the target of litigation or investigations initiated by government authorities or private actors alleging that our activities related to sustainability matters are anti-competitive, discriminatory, or otherwise unlawful.
Read moreGlobal geopolitical and economic instability, as well as continuing uncertainties and challenging conditions in regional economies, could adversely affect our business.
Already happenedThe imposition of tariffs, non-tariff barriers, and other import and export restrictions have contributed to increased global economic uncertainty. The rise of economic nationalism could make it more difficult for us to attract new customers, retain existing customers, continue to produce and source in an optimal manner, or maintain sales at existing levels, both in the U.S. and in other countries. Geopolitical and economic risks have increased over the past few years in many regions of the world, including in the U.S. Our operations expose us to the risk that increased trade protectionism may adversely affect our business. For example, during 2025, the U.S. imposed a variety of new tariffs on most imports from all countries in the world. This in turn prompted several countries to announce tariffs on U.S. imports. While the situation continues to be fluid, tariffs materially impacted our profitability and cash flows in 2025, primarily the bilateral U.S. and Chinese tariffs and U.S. tariffs on all other global import suppliers. Should the tariffs continue at formally communicated levels, we expect to continue to see a material impact to our financial results through the incurrence of additional costs. Additional tariffs or other trade restrictions by the U.S. or other countries where we do significant business, or other restrictions on specific industries, such as pharmaceuticals, could further materially impact our results in the future. We do not expect that our mitigation actions will fully offset the additional costs or other negative impacts resulting from the tariffs. In addition, current changes and uncertainties in global tariffs are causing volatility in our cost positioning in some international markets. Growing tensions, protectionist trade policies, and tariffs may also lead to a fragmentation of the global economy, operational and logistical shifts in supply chains that may lead to higher costs and longer lead times, a general reduction of international trade in goods and services, and a reduction in the integration of financial markets, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business results, cash flows, financial condition, or prospects.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.