Independent Bank
INDB on Nasdaq. Independent Bank Corp sells banking and financial services to people and businesses in New England. Market value $3.8bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 7 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.07.
Profit per $100 you pay: $7.22.
Quality score: 81 of 100. Price score: 93 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$79.39 a share, 25% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $63.33 to $87.50.
Dividend: 2.8% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.05bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.05bn | 0.05bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $82 million, up 60% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $304 million, up from $215 million.
- 13% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $43m |
| December 2024 | $50m |
| March 2025 | $44m |
| June 2025 | $51m |
| September 2025 | $34m |
| December 2025 | $75m |
| March 2026 | $80m |
| June 2026 | $82m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 27 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 5 November 2026
Who owns it
2 long-term investors we follow own it, down from 3 last quarter. 352 funds in all.
- Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team
- Value
- $3m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $3m | <0.1% | |
| Polaris Capital ManagementBernard Horn | $3m | 0.3% | Added |
Sold out this quarter
- GAMCO InvestorsMario GabelliSold out
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$584mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$274m
- State Street$223mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$220mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$182m
- Geode Capital Management$121mAdded
- Rockland Trust$120mCut
- Alliancebernstein L.P.$89mCut
- Channing Capital Management$80m
- Nomura Asset Management International$77m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.9%Since 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 31 March 2026
- STATE STREET CORPORATIONPassive investor5.1%+0.1 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.9% | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
STATE STREET CORPORATION Passive investor | 5.1%+0.1 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 6 sold $15m.
- Venables Thomas RDirectorSold
- Date
- 25 August 2026
- Shares
- 3,750
- Price
- $83.00
- Value
- $311,232
- Nadeau Gerard FDirectorSold
- Date
- 3 August 2026
- Shares
- 5,307
- Price
- $84.69
- Value
- $449,472
- LERNER JOSEPH CDirectorSold
- Date
- 18 May 2026
- Shares
- 2,832
- Price
- $77.31
- Value
- $218,942
- MORRISSEY JOHN JDirectorSold
- Date
- 6 February 2026
- Shares
- 1,988
- Price
- $85.70
- Value
- $170,372
- Abelli Donna LDirectorSold
- Date
- 4 February 2026
- Shares
- 524
- Price
- $85.00
- Value
- $44,517
- Venables Thomas RDirectorSold
- Date
- 5 December 2025
- Shares
- 405
- Price
- $73.93
- Value
- $29,942
- Nadeau Gerard FDirectorSold
- Date
- 3 December 2025
- Shares
- 2,000
- Price
- $74.11
- Value
- $148,220
- Nadeau Gerard FDirectorSold
- Date
- 21 November 2025
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $70.00
- Value
- $210,000
- ANSIN KEN SDirectorSold
- Date
- 14 November 2025
- Shares
- 53,000
- Price
- $69.06
- Value
- $4m
- ANSIN KEN SDirectorSold
- Date
- 10 November 2025
- Shares
- 144,000
- Price
- $69.94
- Value
- $10m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | Venables Thomas R Director | Sold | 3,750 | $83.00 | $311,232 |
| 3 August 2026 | Nadeau Gerard F Director | Sold | 5,307 | $84.69 | $449,472 |
| 18 May 2026 | LERNER JOSEPH C Director | Sold | 2,832 | $77.31 | $218,942 |
| 6 February 2026 | MORRISSEY JOHN J Director | Sold | 1,988 | $85.70 | $170,372 |
| 4 February 2026 | Abelli Donna L Director | Sold | 524 | $85.00 | $44,517 |
| 5 December 2025 | Venables Thomas R Director | Sold | 405 | $73.93 | $29,942 |
| 3 December 2025 | Nadeau Gerard F Director | Sold | 2,000 | $74.11 | $148,220 |
| 21 November 2025 | Nadeau Gerard F Director | Sold | 3,000 | $70.00 | $210,000 |
| 14 November 2025 | ANSIN KEN S Director | Sold | 53,000 | $69.06 | $4m |
| 10 November 2025 | ANSIN KEN S Director | Sold | 144,000 | $69.94 | $10m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 27 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 14 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Risks Related to Information Security and Technology
Could happenThe development and use of AI presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact the Company’s business. The Company or its third-party vendors, clients and counterparties may develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services or products. The development and use of AI present a number of risks and challenges to the Company’s business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving and includes regulatory expectations targeted specifically at AI as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These evolving laws and regulations could increase the Company’s compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance and could require changes with respect to any use or implementation of AI technology by the Company. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce output or take action that is incorrect, that reflects biases included in the data on which they are trained, that results in the release of private, confidential or proprietary information, that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it difficult to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI models, understanding and monitoring the capabilities of AI models, reducing erroneous output, eliminating bias, and complying with regulations that require documentation or explanation of the basis on which decisions are made. Further, the Company may rely on AI models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which the Company may have limited visibility. Any of these risks could expose the Company to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm the Company’s reputation and the public perception of its business or the effectiveness of its security measures.
Read moreRisks Related to the Company’s Business and Industry Generally
Could happenThe success of the Company is dependent on the Company’s ability to attract, hire and retain key personnel. The Company’s business is complex and specialized and performance is largely dependent on the knowledge, talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. The Company relies on key personnel to manage and operate its business, including its major revenue producing functions and key operational functions, such as loan and deposit generation and the Company’s investment management services. The loss of key personnel or challenges attracting and retaining adequate skilled professionals could adversely affect the Company’s ability to maintain and manage these functions effectively and could also adversely impact the achievement of strategic growth objectives. The loss of key personnel or challenges attracting and retaining adequate skilled professionals could also result in increased compensation costs and higher recruiting and hiring expenses, which could adversely impact the Company’s net income. Additionally, if the Company does not maintain effective succession planning, including identifying and developing internal talent, identifying and attracting external talent, and preparing for orderly leadership transitions, it may face disruptions in essential business functions. The Company’s ability to continue to compete effectively depends on its ability to attract new skilled employees, and to retain and motivate its existing key employees. Competition for skilled employees in the Company’s markets and businesses can be intense, and the Company may not be able to hire or retain skilled employees in adequate numbers, in particular due to an increasingly competitive labor market. The labor market continues to be highly competitive with sustained pressure on the availability and retention of skilled professionals. The Company operates in an environment marked by ongoing competition for talent across all areas of its business. In addition to competitive dynamics, the labor market is being influenced by broader structural and macroeconomic factors, including demographic shifts driven by retirements within the financial services industry, a limited pipeline of experienced mid-level and senior banking professionals, evolving employee expectations related to career development and purpose, and increased demand for specialized skills in areas such as commercial credit, risk management, compliance, data analytics, cybersecurity, and digital banking. Employers across the financial services sector continue to offer enhanced compensation, benefits, and flexible work arrangements, including hybrid and remote models, as long-term features of their employment value proposition. Ongoing regulatory complexity, heightened compliance requirements, and increased workload demands may further intensify competition for highly qualified professionals with relevant subject matter expertise. As competition for experienced banking, technology, credit, lending, and investment management, and commercial relationship management talent remains strong, the Company may be required to invest additional resources in recruitment, compensation, training, development, succession planning, and retention initiatives. Wage inflation, benefit cost increases, and investments in programs designed to retain, develop, or attract skilled employees could increase operating expenses and adversely impact earnings.
Read moreRisks Related to Information Security and Technology
Could happenInformation security risks exist because of the proliferation of modern technologies, as well as the sophistication and level of activity of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. The use of AI technologies by cybercriminals continues to be a major concern, including with respect to deep-fake technologies, which continue to improve, allowing bad actors to manipulate or fabricate visual and audio content and convincingly fake identities. Many financial institutions and service providers to financial institutions have reported significant breaches in the security of their websites or other systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, deny service, or sabotage systems, often through the introduction of computer viruses or malware, cyber-attacks and other means. The Company has seen attempts to gain unauthorized access to its systems and expects such attempts will continue, and may intensify, in the future. While the Company has implemented a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy and program to strengthen the control environment, there can be no assurance these risk mitigation strategies will be sufficient to prevent future significant breaches or losses.
Read moreThe soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and operations.
Could happenThe soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and operations. The Company’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. The Company has exposure to many different counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, government sponsored entities, investment banks, and other institutional clients. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by other institutions. Credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Company cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the financial instrument exposure due the Company. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
Read moreRisks Related to Changes in Interest Rates
Could happenThe soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and operations. The Company’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. The Company has exposure to many different counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, government sponsored entities, investment banks, and other institutional clients. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by other institutions. Credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Company cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the financial instrument exposure due the Company. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.