Levi Strauss

LEVI on NYSE. Levi Strauss sells jeans, pants, tops and clothes for men, women and children. Market value $1.8bn.

Watch this stockFree. We tell you when something changes.

Price checks use the past 12 months to May 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to November 2025.

Should I look at this?

Worth a closer look

Read what could go wrong

This is not advice. Check the numbers below.

Compare with another stock

Cash yield
past 12 months to May 2026
6.8%high

For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $6.82 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.

Price to profit
past 12 months to May 2026
12.0×fair

You pay 12.0 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.

Return on capital
five annual reports to November 2025
20.2%five-year median

Each dollar kept in the business earns 20 cents a year. Above 10 is good.

Quality score: 89 of 100. Price score: 99 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.

$20.53 a share, 16% above its 1-year low

Over the past year the price has ranged from $17.72 to $25.70.

Dividend: 2.6% a year

Paid every year for at least 5 years

Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).

Five years of cash, in billions

0.6
-0.0
0.1
0.7
0.3
0.6
2021202220232024202512 monthsto May '26

Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $559 million in the past 12 months, $308 million in the year to November 2025.

Revenue
$5.8bn$6.2bn$5.8bn$6.0bn$6.3bn
Operating margin
11.9%10.5%6.1%4.4%10.8%
Debt to equity
0.620.520.500.510.49
Shares outstanding
0.41bn0.40bn0.40bn0.40bn0.40bn

Health checks

  • Free cash flow positive4 of 5 years
  • Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
  • Financial strength (Piotroski)5 of 8 checks we could run
  • Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
  • Debt0.49× equity
  • Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 7.1% a year
  • Buying back its own sharesYes, 2% fewer since 2021

The quarter to May 2026

How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.

  • Sales: $1.6 billion last quarter, up 8% on a year ago.
  • Profit: $87 million, up 30% on a year ago.
  • It keeps 11 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 9 cents a year earlier.
  • Spare cash over the past 12 months: $559 million, up from $366 million.
  • 2% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
  • Debt is $194 million more than cash, down from $448 million a year ago.
Sales by quarter
Sales by quarter
Quarter toAmount
August 2024$1.4bn
November 2024Not reported
February 2025$1.5bn
May 2025$1.4bn
August 2025$1.5bn
November 2025$1.8bn
February 2026$1.7bn
May 2026$1.6bn
Profit by quarter
Profit by quarter
Quarter toAmount
August 2024$21m
November 2024$183m
February 2025$135m
May 2025$67m
August 2025$218m
November 2025$158m
February 2026$176m
May 2026$87m

From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.

Dates

Next results (estimated)
n/a
Last annual report (10-K)
28 January 2026
Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
7 October 2026

Who owns it

6 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 6 last quarter. 315 funds in all.

Jun '25
Dec '25
Jun '26
Largest holders overall

From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.

Big holders and activists

8 investors own more than 5%.

  • Margaret E. Haas
    Passive investor
    at least 30.2%+1.1 pts
    (filed with 1 related holder)
    Since 31 March 2026
  • Haas, Miriam L.
    Passive investor
    28.8%
    Since 31 December 2024
  • Jennifer C. Haas
    Passive investor
    18.2%
    Since 31 March 2026
  • JPMORGAN CHASE & CO
    Passive investor
    7.1%
    Since 31 March 2026
  • Peter E. Haas, Jr.
    Passive investor
    5.5%
    Since 31 March 2026
  • Elizabeth H. Eisenhardt
    Passive investor
    5.1%
    Since 30 June 2025
  • at least 4.1%
    (filed with 2 related holders)
    Since 30 June 2025
  • Macquarie Group Limited
    Passive investor
    at least 1.7%
    (filed with 3 related holders)
    Since 31 December 2024
  • Sold down below 5%
    Since 30 June 2026
  • FMR LLC
    Passive investor
    Sold down below 5%
    Since 30 September 2025
  • The Vanguard Group
    Passive investor
    Sold down below 5%
    Since 13 March 2026
  • Sold down below 5%
    Since 30 June 2025

From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.

What insiders did

No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 4 sold $10m, $3m of it under preset trading plans.

  • Singh Harmit J
    EVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc.
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    23 July 2026
    Shares
    98,144
    Price
    $24.22
    Value
    $2m
  • Jedrzejek David
    SVP and General Counsel
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    3 June 2026
    Shares
    336
    Price
    $22.82
    Value
    $7,668
  • Hillman Karyn
    EVP and Chief Product Officer
    Sold
    Date
    6 May 2026
    Shares
    38,938
    Price
    $22.91
    Value
    $892,070
  • Singh Harmit J
    EVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc.
    Sold
    Date
    21 April 2026
    Shares
    121,767
    Price
    $23.52
    Value
    $3m
  • Singh Harmit J
    EVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc.
    Sold
    Date
    20 April 2026
    Shares
    110,000
    Price
    $23.00
    Value
    $3m
  • Gowans Jason
    EVP and CDTO
    Sold
    Date
    12 February 2026
    Shares
    40,000
    Price
    $21.83
    Value
    $873,200
  • Jedrzejek David
    SVP and General Counsel
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    3 February 2026
    Shares
    2,248
    Price
    $19.60
    Value
    $44,061
  • Jedrzejek David
    SVP and General Counsel
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    27 January 2026
    Shares
    7,093
    Price
    $21.38
    Value
    $151,648
  • Jedrzejek David
    SVP and General Counsel
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    10 November 2025
    Shares
    4,341
    Price
    $20.60
    Value
    $89,425

From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.

Warning signs in its filings

Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.

None of the warning signs we check for were found.

We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.

We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 28 Jan 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 8 Jul 2026 and 10 later 8-Ks.

A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.

What could go wrong

Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.

Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.

What changed in the risks this year

Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.

  • Use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to stringent and changing obligations. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.

    Could happen
    The use of rapidly evolving technologies such as artificial intelligence technologies, by us and our third-party service providers, while presenting significant benefits, can also present risks and challenges to our business. Using artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies while the technology is still developing may expose us to liability, reputational harm, and threats of litigation, particularly if such technology produces errors or hallucinations, or results in content that is biased, harmful discriminatory, or that infringes the intellectual property or data privacy rights of third parties, or otherwise if such technology does not function as intended. Moreover, with the use of certain artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies, including those licensed from third parties, there may be a lack of transparency of the sources of data used to train or develop such technologies or how inputs are converted to outputs, and we may not be able to fully validate this process and its accuracy.
    Read more
  • Use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to stringent and changing obligations. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.

    Could happen
    Use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies, by us or our service providers, in connection with the creation or development of intellectual property may present challenges in asserting ownership over the resulting output, which may not be eligible for copyright or patent protection under various laws (including those of the United States) without sufficient human authorship or inventorship, respectively. Further, there is a risk that the data inputted into such technologies may contain confidential information, including trade secrets, resulting in such information becoming accessible by third parties. The use of artificial intelligence, including potential inadvertent disclosure of confidential information or personal data, could also lead to legal and regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, or may give rise to specific obligations, including required notices, consents and opt-outs, under various data privacy, protection and cybersecurity laws and regulations in a number of jurisdictions.
    Read more
  • Use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to stringent and changing obligations. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.

    Could happen
    The use of artificial intelligence or machine learning technologies by our third-party service providers in their business activities, whether or not known to use, could also expose us to risks. While we believe we conduct appropriate diligence prior to onboarding third-party service providers, the failure of one or more such service provider to meet our expectations, including by use of artificial intelligence tools in contravention of agreements with us, inputting our confidential or proprietary information into artificial intelligence tools, or roll-out of new artificial intelligence tools without approval, may have an adverse effect on our operations or financial condition, result in legal or regulatory violations, jeopardize our intellectual property rights or give rise to issues pertaining to data privacy and data protection.
    Read more
  • We are subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.

    In addition, our use of online tracking technologies on our platform puts us and our advertising partners at risk of claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) and similar surveillance laws and we have been and may continue to be subject to such claims. These cases typically concern allegations that the use of common third-party technology tools (such as online tracking technologies, cookies, and pixels) on a website constitute interceptions of confidential communications that allegedly constitute wiretapping, which can only be done with the consent of both parties to the communication. CIPA has been a subject of increasing litigation, particularly in the form of class actions. If such suits continue to be brought against us, defending against them in court or in arbitration could substantially increase our legal costs, potential liability, and involve members of our legal teams to assist in defending these claims. Obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent and creating regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Compliance with existing and forthcoming data privacy and security laws and regulations can be costly and time consuming, and may require changes to our information technologies, systems and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal information on our behalf and cause us to divert resources from other initiatives and projects to address these evolving compliance and operational requirements. If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with obligations related to data privacy and security, we could face significant consequences, including, but not limited to, proceedings against the company by governmental entities (for example, investigations, lawsuits (including class actions), fines, penalties, audits and inspections) or other entities or individuals, additional reporting requirements or oversight bans, damage to our reputation and credibility or inability to process data or operate in certain jurisdictions, any of which could have a negative impact on our business, operations, reputation, revenues and profits.
    Read more
  • We face risks arising from the restructuring of our operations and uncertainty with respect to our ability to achieve any anticipated cost savings associated with such restructuring.

    Already happened
    We have in the past and may in the future undertake restructuring initiatives, which have resulted, and may continue to result, in the incurrence of significant additional costs, and our ability to achieve the anticipated cost savings and other benefits from these actions is subject to many estimates and assumptions, which are subject to uncertainties. Risks to successful and timely implementation of these restructuring initiatives include the incurrence of additional costs in the short-term, including workforce reduction costs, costs associated with transitioning functions and processes to new locations, charges for inventory and technology-related write-offs and charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities; failure to accurately assess market opportunities and the technology required to address such opportunities; failure to accurately predict the time and resources necessary to implement our restructuring plan and related go-to-market strategy; actual or perceived disruption to customers, suppliers, distribution networks and other important operational relationships and the inability to resolve potential issues in a timely manner; difficulties transitioning functions and processes to new locations; difficulties transitioning the operation of certain of our global distribution and fulfillment centers to third-party logistics providers including in start up delays and timely delivery of products of acceptable quality; and failure to maintain employee morale, damage to company culture and an increase in employment claims. Because of these and other factors, some of which may not be entirely within our control, we may not fully realize the purpose and anticipated operational benefits, efficiencies or cost savings of any productivity actions in the expected timelines, or at all, and, if we do not, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected. Additionally, prioritizing these efforts over other organizational needs or misallocating resources could adversely impact our business and operating results.
    Read more

Read it in the annual report

The deep dive

Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.

  • What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
  • Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
  • The three things that would make this a mistake
  • Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Create a free account to run it

Your first deep dive is free.

What a finished deep dive looks like

Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.