Levi Strauss
LEVI on NYSE. Levi Strauss sells jeans, pants, tops and clothes for men, women and children. Market value $1.8bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to May 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to November 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $6.82 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 12.0 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 20 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 89 of 100. Price score: 99 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$20.53 a share, 16% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $17.72 to $25.70.
Dividend: 2.6% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $559 million in the past 12 months, $308 million in the year to November 2025.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $5.8bn | $6.2bn | $5.8bn | $6.0bn | $6.3bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 11.9% | 10.5% | 6.1% | 4.4% | 10.8% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.49 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.41bn | 0.40bn | 0.40bn | 0.40bn | 0.40bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive4 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)5 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.49× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 7.1% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 2% fewer since 2021
The quarter to May 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.6 billion last quarter, up 8% on a year ago.
- Profit: $87 million, up 30% on a year ago.
- It keeps 11 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 9 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $559 million, up from $366 million.
- 2% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $194 million more than cash, down from $448 million a year ago.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| August 2024 | $1.4bn |
| November 2024 | Not reported |
| February 2025 | $1.5bn |
| May 2025 | $1.4bn |
| August 2025 | $1.5bn |
| November 2025 | $1.8bn |
| February 2026 | $1.7bn |
| May 2026 | $1.6bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| August 2024 | $21m |
| November 2024 | $183m |
| February 2025 | $135m |
| May 2025 | $67m |
| August 2025 | $218m |
| November 2025 | $158m |
| February 2026 | $176m |
| May 2026 | $87m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 28 January 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 7 October 2026
Who owns it
6 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 6 last quarter. 315 funds in all.
- Gardner Russo & QuinnTom Russo
- Value
- $2m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok
- Value
- $124,000
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brandes Investment PartnersCharles Brandes | $3m | <0.1% | Added |
| Jensen Investment ManagementEric Schoenstein | $3m | <0.1% | Cut |
| Gardner Russo & QuinnTom Russo | $2m | <0.1% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $2m | <0.1% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $403,016 | <0.1% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $124,000 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- JPMorgan Chase$170m
- Bank of New York Mellon$120m
- Vanguard Capital Management$102mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$99mCut
- TWO Sigma Investments, LP$80m
- BlackRock$70mCut
- GW&K Investment Management$64mCut
- Eastern Bank$61mNew
- Citadel Advisors$58mAdded
- Wellington Management Group LLP$55mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
8 investors own more than 5%.
- Margaret E. HaasPassive investorat least 30.2%+1.1 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 March 2026
- Haas, Miriam L.Passive investor28.8%Since 31 December 2024
- Jennifer C. HaasPassive investor18.2%Since 31 March 2026
- JPMORGAN CHASE & COPassive investor7.1%Since 31 March 2026
- Peter E. Haas, Jr.Passive investor5.5%Since 31 March 2026
- Elizabeth H. EisenhardtPassive investor5.1%Since 30 June 2025
- Wellington Management Group LLPPassive investorat least 4.1%(filed with 2 related holders)Since 30 June 2025
- Macquarie Group LimitedPassive investorat least 1.7%(filed with 3 related holders)Since 31 December 2024
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- FMR LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
- Capital Research Global InvestorsPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2025
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Margaret E. Haas Passive investor | at least 30.2%+1.1 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 March 2026 | |
Haas, Miriam L. Passive investor | 28.8% | 31 December 2024 | |
Jennifer C. Haas Passive investor | 18.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Passive investor | 7.1% | 31 March 2026 | |
Peter E. Haas, Jr. Passive investor | 5.5% | 31 March 2026 | |
Elizabeth H. Eisenhardt Passive investor | 5.1% | 30 June 2025 | |
Wellington Management Group LLP Passive investor | at least 4.1% (filed with 2 related holders) | 30 June 2025 | |
Macquarie Group Limited Passive investor | at least 1.7% (filed with 3 related holders) | 31 December 2024 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 | |
Capital Research Global Investors Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2025 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 4 sold $10m, $3m of it under preset trading plans.
- Singh Harmit JEVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc.Soldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 23 July 2026
- Shares
- 98,144
- Price
- $24.22
- Value
- $2m
- Jedrzejek DavidSVP and General CounselSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 June 2026
- Shares
- 336
- Price
- $22.82
- Value
- $7,668
- Hillman KarynEVP and Chief Product OfficerSold
- Date
- 6 May 2026
- Shares
- 38,938
- Price
- $22.91
- Value
- $892,070
- Singh Harmit JEVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc.Sold
- Date
- 21 April 2026
- Shares
- 121,767
- Price
- $23.52
- Value
- $3m
- Singh Harmit JEVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc.Sold
- Date
- 20 April 2026
- Shares
- 110,000
- Price
- $23.00
- Value
- $3m
- Gowans JasonEVP and CDTOSold
- Date
- 12 February 2026
- Shares
- 40,000
- Price
- $21.83
- Value
- $873,200
- Jedrzejek DavidSVP and General CounselSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 February 2026
- Shares
- 2,248
- Price
- $19.60
- Value
- $44,061
- Jedrzejek DavidSVP and General CounselSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 27 January 2026
- Shares
- 7,093
- Price
- $21.38
- Value
- $151,648
- Jedrzejek DavidSVP and General CounselSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 10 November 2025
- Shares
- 4,341
- Price
- $20.60
- Value
- $89,425
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 July 2026 | Singh Harmit J EVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc. | Sold under a preset trading plan | 98,144 | $24.22 | $2m |
| 3 June 2026 | Jedrzejek David SVP and General Counsel | Sold under a preset trading plan | 336 | $22.82 | $7,668 |
| 6 May 2026 | Hillman Karyn EVP and Chief Product Officer | Sold | 38,938 | $22.91 | $892,070 |
| 21 April 2026 | Singh Harmit J EVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc. | Sold | 121,767 | $23.52 | $3m |
| 20 April 2026 | Singh Harmit J EVP & Chief Fin. & Growth Ofc. | Sold | 110,000 | $23.00 | $3m |
| 12 February 2026 | Gowans Jason EVP and CDTO | Sold | 40,000 | $21.83 | $873,200 |
| 3 February 2026 | Jedrzejek David SVP and General Counsel | Sold under a preset trading plan | 2,248 | $19.60 | $44,061 |
| 27 January 2026 | Jedrzejek David SVP and General Counsel | Sold under a preset trading plan | 7,093 | $21.38 | $151,648 |
| 10 November 2025 | Jedrzejek David SVP and General Counsel | Sold under a preset trading plan | 4,341 | $20.60 | $89,425 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 28 Jan 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 8 Jul 2026 and 10 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to stringent and changing obligations. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.
Could happenThe use of rapidly evolving technologies such as artificial intelligence technologies, by us and our third-party service providers, while presenting significant benefits, can also present risks and challenges to our business. Using artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies while the technology is still developing may expose us to liability, reputational harm, and threats of litigation, particularly if such technology produces errors or hallucinations, or results in content that is biased, harmful discriminatory, or that infringes the intellectual property or data privacy rights of third parties, or otherwise if such technology does not function as intended. Moreover, with the use of certain artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies, including those licensed from third parties, there may be a lack of transparency of the sources of data used to train or develop such technologies or how inputs are converted to outputs, and we may not be able to fully validate this process and its accuracy.
Read moreUse of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to stringent and changing obligations. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.
Could happenUse of artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies, by us or our service providers, in connection with the creation or development of intellectual property may present challenges in asserting ownership over the resulting output, which may not be eligible for copyright or patent protection under various laws (including those of the United States) without sufficient human authorship or inventorship, respectively. Further, there is a risk that the data inputted into such technologies may contain confidential information, including trade secrets, resulting in such information becoming accessible by third parties. The use of artificial intelligence, including potential inadvertent disclosure of confidential information or personal data, could also lead to legal and regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, or may give rise to specific obligations, including required notices, consents and opt-outs, under various data privacy, protection and cybersecurity laws and regulations in a number of jurisdictions.
Read moreUse of artificial intelligence technologies by us and our service providers could subject us to stringent and changing obligations. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.
Could happenThe use of artificial intelligence or machine learning technologies by our third-party service providers in their business activities, whether or not known to use, could also expose us to risks. While we believe we conduct appropriate diligence prior to onboarding third-party service providers, the failure of one or more such service provider to meet our expectations, including by use of artificial intelligence tools in contravention of agreements with us, inputting our confidential or proprietary information into artificial intelligence tools, or roll-out of new artificial intelligence tools without approval, may have an adverse effect on our operations or financial condition, result in legal or regulatory violations, jeopardize our intellectual property rights or give rise to issues pertaining to data privacy and data protection.
Read moreWe are subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm and other adverse business or financial consequences.
In addition, our use of online tracking technologies on our platform puts us and our advertising partners at risk of claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) and similar surveillance laws and we have been and may continue to be subject to such claims. These cases typically concern allegations that the use of common third-party technology tools (such as online tracking technologies, cookies, and pixels) on a website constitute interceptions of confidential communications that allegedly constitute wiretapping, which can only be done with the consent of both parties to the communication. CIPA has been a subject of increasing litigation, particularly in the form of class actions. If such suits continue to be brought against us, defending against them in court or in arbitration could substantially increase our legal costs, potential liability, and involve members of our legal teams to assist in defending these claims. Obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent and creating regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Compliance with existing and forthcoming data privacy and security laws and regulations can be costly and time consuming, and may require changes to our information technologies, systems and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal information on our behalf and cause us to divert resources from other initiatives and projects to address these evolving compliance and operational requirements. If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with obligations related to data privacy and security, we could face significant consequences, including, but not limited to, proceedings against the company by governmental entities (for example, investigations, lawsuits (including class actions), fines, penalties, audits and inspections) or other entities or individuals, additional reporting requirements or oversight bans, damage to our reputation and credibility or inability to process data or operate in certain jurisdictions, any of which could have a negative impact on our business, operations, reputation, revenues and profits.
Read moreWe face risks arising from the restructuring of our operations and uncertainty with respect to our ability to achieve any anticipated cost savings associated with such restructuring.
Already happenedWe have in the past and may in the future undertake restructuring initiatives, which have resulted, and may continue to result, in the incurrence of significant additional costs, and our ability to achieve the anticipated cost savings and other benefits from these actions is subject to many estimates and assumptions, which are subject to uncertainties. Risks to successful and timely implementation of these restructuring initiatives include the incurrence of additional costs in the short-term, including workforce reduction costs, costs associated with transitioning functions and processes to new locations, charges for inventory and technology-related write-offs and charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities; failure to accurately assess market opportunities and the technology required to address such opportunities; failure to accurately predict the time and resources necessary to implement our restructuring plan and related go-to-market strategy; actual or perceived disruption to customers, suppliers, distribution networks and other important operational relationships and the inability to resolve potential issues in a timely manner; difficulties transitioning functions and processes to new locations; difficulties transitioning the operation of certain of our global distribution and fulfillment centers to third-party logistics providers including in start up delays and timely delivery of products of acceptable quality; and failure to maintain employee morale, damage to company culture and an increase in employment claims. Because of these and other factors, some of which may not be entirely within our control, we may not fully realize the purpose and anticipated operational benefits, efficiencies or cost savings of any productivity actions in the expected timelines, or at all, and, if we do not, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected. Additionally, prioritizing these efforts over other organizational needs or misallocating resources could adversely impact our business and operating results.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.