L3harris Technologies

None of the serious warning signs we check for were found. 1 thing worth knowing.

We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.

We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 12 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026 and 8 later 8-Ks.

• One big customer

  Worth knowing

  One customer brings in a big share of sales: 75% last year. Losing that customer would hurt.

  “In fiscal 2025, the percentage of our revenue that was derived from sales to U.S. Government customers, whether directly or through prime contractors, including foreign military sales funded through the U.S. Government, was 75% and no other customer accounted for more than 5% of our revenue.”

  From the 10-K filed 12 February 2026, Item 1. Business. Read it in the filing

Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.

Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.

• Macroeconomic, Industry and Governmental Risks

  The market for sales to U.S. Government customers is highly competitive and the U.S. Government may choose to use other contractors as part of competitive bidding processes or otherwise. The U.S. Government has increasingly relied on certain types of contracts that are subject to multiple competitive bidding processes, including multi-vendor indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (“IDIQ”), government-wide acquisition contracts, General _____________________________________________________________________ 5 Services Administration Schedules and other multi-award contracts, which has resulted in greater competition and increased pricing pressure. The DoW’s current procurement reform initiative, including the increased use of other transaction authority (“OTA”) agreements, could reduce barriers to entry and result in even greater competition and increased pricing pressure. OTAs are not subject to many traditional procurement laws, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), and in some instances, an OTA award may require that a significant part of the work be carried out by a non-traditional defense contractor or that a portion of the prototype project's costs be covered by non-governmental sources. Some of our competitors, including non-traditional new entrants to defense-related programs, have greater financial resources than we do and may have more extensive or more specialized engineering, manufacturing and marketing capabilities than we do in some areas. We may not be able to continue to win competitively awarded contracts or to obtain task orders under multi-award contracts, especially with increased competition. We may choose not to bid in certain competitive bidding processes, which would result in the potential loss of opportunities, or we may choose to partner with competitors, which could expose our business to additional factors beyond our control. Additionally, bid protests from unsuccessful bidders can result in significant expense or delay, contract modification or contract rescission as a result of our competitors protesting or challenging contracts awarded to us.

  Read moreShow less

• Macroeconomic, Industry and Governmental Risks

  Could happen

  The failure to effectively maintain and modernize our IT systems and infrastructure could adversely affect our business. Rapid development cycles and the growth and expansion of our business has created technical debt within our enterprise. As part of our digital transformation, we are modernizing our infrastructure, applications, and information ecosystem, inclusive of cloud migrations, increasing automation and expanding the use of AI. Until our digital transformation is fully complete, we will continue to rely on significant manual processes and procedures that subject us to increased risk of error and internal control failure compared to automated processes. Our ability to modernize our technology systems and infrastructure requires us to execute large-scale, complex programs and projects, which rely on the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources and effective planning and management processes. We also rely on third party outsourcing, so the speed and effectiveness of our digital transformation may be subject to additional factors beyond our control. Additionally, integrating AI capabilities could increase technical complexity, potentially exacerbating these challenges. As a result, we may be unable to complete our digital transformation and manage our technical debt efficiently or in a timely manner, which could result in operational resiliency issues, delivery delays, cost overruns, additional expenses, reputational harm, legal and regulatory actions, and other adverse consequences.

  Read moreShow less

• Macroeconomic, Industry and Governmental Risks

  Could happen

  Even though we primarily sell our products and services to U.S. Government customers and our suppliers are primarily domestic, we still rely on imported materials, components, or finished goods, and if tariffs increase, our supply chain costs may rise, adversely affecting our business, results of operations and cash flows. We also operate a business in Canada that supports both domestic and international programs. If we are not granted exemptions from tariffs due to the nature of our business and customers, we could see greater impacts than we currently expect, especially as it relates to tariffs between the U.S. and Canada. Additionally, retaliatory measures, or prolonged uncertainty in trade relationships could result in supply chain disruptions, delayed shipments, or increased operational complexity, which could also adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows. While we intend to take steps to mitigate any impacts of tariffs or other impacts resulting from changes in trade policy, our ability to do so may be limited by operational and supply chain constraints, especially in the short term.

  Read moreShow less

• Macroeconomic, Industry and Governmental Risks

  Could happen

  The competitive landscape is also evolving, with increased competition from non-traditional new entrants, including technology start-ups. While these competitors may lack our scale, production capacity, and established customer trust, they may possess innovative or low-cost technologies and the ability to rapidly deploy new solutions. The emergence of such players may intensify pricing pressure and threaten our market share or competitive advantage.

  Read moreShow less

• Macroeconomic, Industry and Governmental Risks

  Could happen

  • Laws, regulations and policies of foreign governments relating to investments and operations, including laws restricting our ability to transact in certain countries and/or markets;