Live Oak Bancshares
LOB on NYSE. Live Oak Bancshares provides loans to small businesses, mostly backed by the government. Market value $1.7bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Look carefully before going further
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Read the warning sign in its own filings
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 9 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.29.
Profit per $100 you pay: $8.26.
Quality score: 87 of 100. Price score: 92 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$36.49 a share, 24% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $29.36 to $44.53.
Dividend: 0.3% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.05bn | 0.05bn | 0.05bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 5% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $37 million, up 57% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $237 million, up from $106 million.
- 2% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $13m |
| December 2024 | $10m |
| March 2025 | $10m |
| June 2025 | $23m |
| September 2025 | $27m |
| December 2025 | $46m |
| March 2026 | $30m |
| June 2026 | $37m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 27 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 3 November 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 5 last quarter. 240 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $56m | 0.2% | Cut |
| SouthernSun Asset ManagementMichael Cook | $38m | 5.1% | Cut |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $26m | 0.2% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $11m | <0.1% | Added |
| Diamond Hill Capital ManagementRic Dillon (founder) | $7m | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- T. Rowe Price Investment Management$264m
- BlackRock$144mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$68mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$66m
- State Street$56mCut
- Barrow Hanley$56mCut
- Gilder Gagnon Howe$46mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$41mAdded
- SouthernSun Asset Management$38mCut
- Geode Capital Management$37mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIPassive investorat least 14.4%(filed with 3 related holders)Since 31 December 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAHAN JAMES S III Passive investor | at least 14.4% (filed with 3 related holders) | 31 December 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 2 insiders bought $130,234 of shares on the open market. 9 sold $21m, $16m of it under preset trading plans.
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 10 September 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $38.75
- Value
- $387,485
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 9 September 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $38.63
- Value
- $386,312
- Bradford Tonya WilliamsDirectorSold
- Date
- 3 September 2026
- Shares
- 1,600
- Price
- $39.89
- Value
- $63,824
- WILLIAMS WILLIAM L. IIIDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 September 2026
- Shares
- 6,590
- Price
- $40.09
- Value
- $264,220
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 September 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $39.75
- Value
- $397,466
- WILLIAMS WILLIAM L. IIIDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 1,810
- Price
- $40.00
- Value
- $72,401
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $39.54
- Value
- $395,411
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 27 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $39.66
- Value
- $396,590
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 26 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $39.99
- Value
- $399,878
- MAHAN JAMES S IIIChief Executive Officer, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 20 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $40.53
- Value
- $405,283
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 September 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $38.75 | $387,485 |
| 9 September 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $38.63 | $386,312 |
| 3 September 2026 | Bradford Tonya Williams Director | Sold | 1,600 | $39.89 | $63,824 |
| 3 September 2026 | WILLIAMS WILLIAM L. III Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 6,590 | $40.09 | $264,220 |
| 3 September 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $39.75 | $397,466 |
| 2 September 2026 | WILLIAMS WILLIAM L. III Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 1,810 | $40.00 | $72,401 |
| 2 September 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $39.54 | $395,411 |
| 27 August 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $39.66 | $396,590 |
| 26 August 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $39.99 | $399,878 |
| 20 August 2026 | MAHAN JAMES S III Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 10,000 | $40.53 | $405,283 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
2 serious warning signs in Live Oak Bancshares’ filings.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 27 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 8 later 8-Ks.
Weak checks on its own accounts
SeriousThe company said its checks on its own accounts did not work at the end of its latest quarter. Mistakes could slip into the numbers.
“The conclusion that disclosure controls and procedures were not effective was due to the presence of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) as previously disclosed in Part II, Item 9A of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.”
From the 10-Q filed 4 August 2026, Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures. Read it in the filing
Its past accounts can't be relied on
SeriousIt told the SEC its earlier accounts should no longer be relied on, usually because they contained errors.
8-K Item 4.02 filed 12 Nov 2025: the company said its earlier financial statements should no longer be relied on.
From an 8-K filed 12 November 2025: Previously issued accounts should no longer be relied on. Open the filing
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
We face risks related to the restatement of our financial statements.
Could happenIn November 2025, we determined to restate the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, in order to restate the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and related notes. As a result, we are subject to additional risks and uncertainties, which could affect investor confidence in the accuracy of our financial disclosures and may cause reputational harm to our business. We may face potential litigation or other disputes, which may include, among others, claims under federal and state securities laws. In addition, the processes undertaken to effect the restatement may not have been adequate to identify and correct all errors in our historical financial statements. If one or more of these risks persist, our business, operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Read moreThe deployment and use of artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business.
Could happenIncreased adoption of AI technologies also has the potential to alter competitive dynamics and demand in certain verticals that make up part of our small-business borrower base, including, for example, certified public accountants and investment advisory firms. If these technologies reduce demand for, or compress margins within, these or other verticals, affected borrowers may experience revenue volatility, fee compression, or client attrition, which could negatively affect their creditworthiness, increase our credit losses, and reduce the demand for our services.
Read moreChanges in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Could happenThere have been, and may be in the future, changes with respect to U.S. and international trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade restrictions. In response to tariffs imposed by the U.S., foreign countries have implemented, or may implement, retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Historically, tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions. Political tensions as a result of trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange, and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. It may also cause the prices of our customers’ products and services to increase, which could reduce demand for such products and services, or reduce our customers’ margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results, and ability to service debt. This in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We lend primarily to small businesses in selected industries. Our small business borrowers have fewer financial resources than larger commercial entities, and as a result may be more susceptible than larger businesses to decreased economic activity caused by changes in trade policies and global trade patterns. Negative impacts on our small business borrowers could impair their ability to service their debt, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, to the extent changes in the political environment have a negative impact on us, our small business borrowers, or on the markets in which we operate our business, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted in the future. At this time, it remains unclear what the U.S. government or foreign governments will or will not do with respect to additional tariffs that may be imposed or changes that may be made to international trade agreements and policies.
Read moreThe deployment and use of artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business.
Could happenIn addition, the use and development of AI technologies by the us and our third-party vendors, clients, and counterparties may expose us to risks and potential liabilities. These risks may occur as a result of enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, ethical concerns, confidentiality or other security risks, intellectual property concerns over data rights and protection, heightened susceptibility to cyberattacks, inaccurate or biased algorithms or underlying datasets, privacy concerns or compliance issues, as well as other factors that could adversely affect our business, reputation, and financial results.
Read moreThe deployment and use of artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business.
Could happenThe failure to strategically embrace these technologies or to achieve the expected effectiveness, productivity, or cost-reduction from our adoption of these technologies may put us at a competitive disadvantage. If we cannot integrate these technologies into our business as effectively as our competitors, if our competitors develop more cost-effective solutions or other product offerings, or if our employees do not adopt such technologies expediently and prudently, we could experience a material adverse effect on our operating results, customer relationships, and growth opportunities. Our use and deployment of AI solutions may introduce operational and control risks, including the risk of potential errors in automated decision-making, challenges in oversight and accountability, increased vulnerability to system failures or cyber incidents, and the risk that these technologies may not perform as intended under complex or unforeseen circumstances, which could materially disrupt our business operations and adversely affect our financial condition and reputation.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.