MetroCity Bankshares
MCBS on Nasdaq. MetroCity Bankshares sells loans and deposits to small and medium businesses and individuals. Market value $1.0bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 16 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.77.
Profit per $100 you pay: $7.96.
Quality score: 100 of 100. Price score: 80 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$34.86 a share, 42% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $24.53 to $37.46.
Dividend: 2.5% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Payouts have jumped around in recent years, so this may not repeat.
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn | 0.03bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 14% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Profit: $22 million, up 32% on a year ago.
- 13% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $17m |
| December 2024 | $16m |
| March 2025 | $16m |
| June 2025 | $17m |
| September 2025 | $17m |
| December 2025 | $18m |
| March 2026 | $22m |
| June 2026 | $22m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 16 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 6 November 2026
Who owns it
None of the long-term investors we follow own it. 118 funds in all.
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$65mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$34mAdded
- American Century Companies$26mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$21mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$20mAdded
- State Street$18mAdded
- Northern Trust$8mAdded
- Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, the$8m
- Charles Schwab Investment Management$7mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$6mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor5.8%+1.2 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- Nack Y. PaekPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 December 2024
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 5.8%+1.2 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
Nack Y. Paek Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 December 2024 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought or sold on the open market in the last 12 months.
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 16 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 7 Aug 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
In addition, certain statements in the following risk factors constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 3 of this Annual Report .
Could happenMany of our competitors offer the same, or a wider variety of, the banking and related financial services we offer within our market areas. These competitors include national banks, regional banks and other community banks, including banks similar to us that primarily serve distinct or multi-ethnic communities. In many instances these national and regional banks have greater resources than we do, and the smaller community banks may have stronger ties in local markets than we do, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including fintech companies, savings associations, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, mortgage banks and other financial intermediaries. Further, our credit union competitors benefit from competitive advantages, including the credit union exemption from paying federal income tax and can, therefore, more aggressively price many products and services. In addition, a number of out-of-state financial intermediaries have opened production offices or otherwise solicit deposits in our market areas. We also compete with many forms of payments offered by both bank and non-bank providers, including a variety of new and evolving alternative payment mechanisms, systems and products, such as aggregators and web-based and wireless payment platforms or technologies, digital or “crypto” currencies, prepaid systems and payment services targeting users of social networks, communications platforms and online gaming. Competition is increasingly focused on digital capabilities, customer experience, speed, and convenience, and failure to meet evolving customer expectations may adversely affect our competitive position. Some competitors may be willing to accept lower returns, assume greater risk, or offer more favorable pricing and terms than we are willing or able to provide, which could place downward pressure on our margins. In addition, some competitors may offer banking and payment services through embedded or platform-based models that reduce the need for customers to maintain traditional banking relationships. Our future success may depend, in part, on our ability to use technology competitively to offer products and services that provide convenience to customers and create additional efficiencies in our operations. If we are unable to match the pace of technological change or the level of investment made by larger or more technologically advanced competitors, we may experience customer attrition or reduced growth opportunities. Further, as a result of the GENIUS Act, passed in 2025 to provide a regulatory framework for stablecoins in the U.S., increased competition may emerge from issuers of stablecoins and providers of related technology.
Read moreIf we fail to successfully integrate our acquisitions or to realize the anticipated benefits of them, our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected .
Could happenWe intend to continue to regularly evaluate potential acquisitions and expansion opportunities. To the extent we grow through acquisition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to manage this growth adequately or profitably. Acquiring other banks, branches or businesses, as well as other geographic and product expansion activities, involve various risks including: (i) risk of unknown, undisclosed or contingent liabilities that could arise after the closing of an acquisition and for which there is no indemnification obligation or other price protection mechanism associated with the acquisition; (ii) unanticipated costs and delays, including as a result of enhanced regulatory scrutiny; (iii) risks that acquired new businesses do not perform consistently with our growth and profitability expectations; (iv) risks of entering new market or product areas where we have limited experience; (v) risks that growth will strain our infrastructure, staff, internal controls and management, which may require additional personnel, time and expenditures; (vi) exposure to potential asset quality issues with acquired institutions; (vii) difficulties, expenses and delays of integrating the operations and personnel of acquired institutions, and start-up delays and costs of other expansion activities; (viii) inaccurate estimates of value assigned to acquired assets; (ix) potential disruptions to our business; (x) possible loss of key employees and customers of acquired institutions; (xi) potential short-term decrease in profitability; (xii) potential dilution of our current shareholders or a decline in our share price resulting from the issuance in connection with an acquisition of equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, any of which may be senior to our common stock as to distributions and in liquidation; (xiii) litigation; and (xiv) diversion of our management’s time and attention from our existing operations and businesses.
Read moreOur future success is largely dependent upon our ability to successfully execute our business strategy.
Could happenFailure to achieve these objectives could impair our ability to execute our strategy and adversely affect our business, growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, ineffective growth management, technology implementation challenges, cost overruns or service disruptions involving third‑party providers could hinder our ability to achieve our strategic objectives. Pursuing multiple strategic initiatives simultaneously, including acquisitions, technology investments or geographic expansion, may place additional strain on management, personnel, systems and controls. Our ability to execute our strategic objectives depends, in part, on the successful integration of First IC Corporation following the completion of the Company’s acquisition on December 1, 2025. The integration process will require significant management attention and resources and may divert focus from other initiatives. We may encounter challenges integrating systems, processes, controls, personnel and cultures, and there can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits or efficiencies of the transaction will be realized on the expected timeline or at all. Failure to successfully integrate the businesses could adversely affect our growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations
Read moreDecreased residential mortgage origination, volume and pricing decisions of competitors may adversely affect our profitability.
Could happenIn addition, the development or acquisition of new products, services or business lines may involve operational, technological or integration challenges, including reliance on third‑party vendors or strategic partners, which could increase costs or delay implementation. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. If our risk management, compliance or internal control processes do not scale effectively to support new activities, we may be exposed to increased operational, legal or regulatory risk. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, unsuccessful product launches or new business initiatives could adversely affect our reputation and divert management attention from existing operations.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.