Pediatrix Medical Group
MD on NYSE. Pediatrix Medical Group provides healthcare services to patients, paid by Medicaid and other insurers. Market value $2.1bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing big in our quick check. See what could go wrong below.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $10.82 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 11.2 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 9 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 71 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$26.00 a share, 66% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $15.70 to $27.94.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $1.9bn | $2.0bn | $2.0bn | $2.0bn | $1.9bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 10.6% | 8.8% | 0.4% | -3.4% | 10.9% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.12 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.69 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.08bn | 0.08bn | 0.09bn | 0.09bn | 0.08bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)7 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.69× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 2.0% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 2% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $488 million last quarter, up 4% on a year ago.
- Profit: $40 million, up 1% on a year ago.
- It keeps 11 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 9 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $229 million, up from $227 million.
- 5% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $295 million more than cash, down from $383 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 2 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $511m |
| December 2024 | $502m |
| March 2025 | $458m |
| June 2025 | $469m |
| September 2025 | $493m |
| December 2025 | $494m |
| March 2026 | $476m |
| June 2026 | $488m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $19m |
| December 2024 | $30m |
| March 2025 | $21m |
| June 2025 | $39m |
| September 2025 | $72m |
| December 2025 | $34m |
| March 2026 | $30m |
| June 2026 | $40m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 19 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 3 November 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 5 last quarter. 304 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $30m | <0.1% | Added |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $23m | 0.2% | Added |
| Brandes Investment PartnersCharles Brandes | $10m | <0.1% | Cut |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $2m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $278,503 | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$347m
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$152mCut
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$107mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$92m
- State Street$89mAdded
- Victory Capital Management$87mCut
- Wasatch Advisors LP$63mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$56m
- American Century Companies$56mCut
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management$44mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor14.6%Since 30 June 2025
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor7.5%0.0 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.2%0.0 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investor5.1%Since 30 June 2026
- Rubric Capital Management LPPassive investorat least 3.7%(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 December 2024
- AllianceBernstein L.P.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 May 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 14.6% | 30 June 2025 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 7.5%0.0 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.2%0.0 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | 5.1% | 30 June 2026 | |
Rubric Capital Management LP Passive investor | at least 3.7% (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 December 2024 | |
AllianceBernstein L.P. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 May 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 4 sold $2m.
- Weis Shirley ADirectorSold
- Date
- 13 May 2026
- Shares
- 36,028
- Price
- $23.75
- Value
- $855,665
- ORDAN MARK SChief Executive Officer, DirectorSold
- Date
- 15 December 2025
- Shares
- 23,000
- Price
- $22.41
- Value
- $515,430
- Rucker Michael A.DirectorSold
- Date
- 17 November 2025
- Shares
- 10,478
- Price
- $23.00
- Value
- $240,994
- Linynsky Laura ADirectorSold
- Date
- 6 November 2025
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $21.65
- Value
- $216,500
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 May 2026 | Weis Shirley A Director | Sold | 36,028 | $23.75 | $855,665 |
| 15 December 2025 | ORDAN MARK S Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 23,000 | $22.41 | $515,430 |
| 17 November 2025 | Rucker Michael A. Director | Sold | 10,478 | $23.00 | $240,994 |
| 6 November 2025 | Linynsky Laura A Director | Sold | 10,000 | $21.65 | $216,500 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 19 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
- Sales have barely grown: 2.0% a year.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies may expose us to additional legal, regulatory, operational, and competitive risks.
Could happenSome of our information systems that support our day-to-day operations, ongoing clinical initiatives and business analyses increasingly utilize AI, including to assist with clinical documentation. AI technologies are highly complex and rapidly evolving, and their use presents risks, challenges and the potential for unintended consequences, including errors, bias, system failures, or limitations in performance, which could affect their adoption or effectiveness and, in turn, our operations and business. At the same time, our ability to remain competitive may depend in part on our ability to effectively develop, implement and utilize AI technologies. If we are unable to keep pace with technological developments or the adoption of AI by competitors, or if competitors are able to achieve greater operational efficiencies, cost savings, or service enhancements through their use of AI, our competitive position, operating results, or growth prospects could be adversely affected.
Read moreExpanding eligibility of GHC Programs could adversely affect our reimbursement.
Could happenIn general, payments received from GHC Programs are substantially less than payments received from private healthcare insurance programs (managed care and other third-party payors). A shift in the mix of our payors from private healthcare insurance programs to government payors may result in an increase in our estimated provision for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles and a corresponding decrease in our net revenue, as well as a significant reduction in our average reimbursement rates. Further, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cut federal spending on Medicaid and CHIP benefits by $1 trillion, due in part to eliminating at least 10.5 million people from the programs by 2034. If Congress does not act to extend CHIP beyond 2027, or if Congress extends CHIP but substantially alters the current program, we could be adversely affected if children in states where we do business lose Medicaid coverage or payments for services furnished to these children are delayed or reduced.
Read moreOur use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies may expose us to additional legal, regulatory, operational, and competitive risks.
Could happenCompliance with current or future AI-related laws and regulations, or changes in their interpretation, could require us to modify our information systems, limit or discontinue certain uses of AI, or incur additional costs to ensure compliance. We may not be able to anticipate or respond effectively to these developments, and failure to comply could result in legal or regulatory actions, fines, penalties, or reputational harm. The costs associated with compliance, system modifications, or potential disruptions to our operations could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Read moreThe healthcare industry is highly regulated, and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations.
Could happenWe may in the future become the subject of regulatory or other investigations, audits or proceedings, and our interpretations of applicable laws, rules and regulations may be challenged, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. For example, in some states, we are dependent on our relationship with affiliated physician practices, which we do not own, to provide physician and other clinical services, and our business would be adversely affected if those relationships were disrupted or if our arrangements with our providers are found to violate state laws prohibiting the corporate practice of medicine or fee splitting, or if our contractual relationships with such entities cease to continue. Our contracts include management services agreements among other agreements with such affiliated physician practices, to which these practices reserve exclusive control and responsibility for all aspects of the practice of medicine and delivery of medical services. Recent state legislative activity has reflected growing scrutiny of the corporate practice of medicine, with a number of states proposing or enacting laws to expand existing prohibitions, enhance disclosure and reporting obligations, and broaden enforcement authority over management and ownership arrangements between healthcare providers and non-clinical entities. While we seek to substantially comply with the applicable state prohibitions on the corporate practice of medicine and fee splitting, these laws could impact our business operations, and state officials who administer these laws or other third parties may successfully challenge our contractual arrangements, which could subject us to civil and criminal penalties and require us to restructure our relationships with providers to comply with these statutes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operations. Additionally, state corporate practice of medicine doctrines often impose penalties on physicians themselves for aiding the corporate practice of medicine, which could impact physicians participating with our affiliated physician practices. See Item 1. Business—“Government Regulation—Fee Splitting; Corporate Practice of Medicine.”
Read morePotential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.
Could happenIn addition to the ACA, there could be changes to other GHC Programs, such as a change to the Medicaid program design or Medicaid coverage and reimbursement rates set forth under federal or state law. For example, on July 4, 2025, President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which reforms the Medicaid program by eliminating certain financial incentives for states that have expanded their Medicaid programs under the ACA, imposing work requirements on certain adult beneficiaries, and requiring states to increase patient cost-sharing amounts for certain services. These reforms to the Medicaid program could have a material impact on our business.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.