Maximus

MMS on NYSE. Maximus sells services to government agencies. Market value $2.8bn.

Watch this stockFree. We tell you when something changes.

Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to September 2025.

Should I look at this?

Worth a closer look

Read what could go wrong

This is not advice. Check the numbers below.

Compare with another stock

Cash yield
past 12 months to June 2026
15.1%very high

For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $15.13 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.

Price to profit
past 12 months to June 2026
7.7×cheap

You pay 7.7 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.

Return on capital
five annual reports to September 2025
11.3%five-year median

Each dollar kept in the business earns 11 cents a year. Above 10 is good.

Quality score: 87 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.

$54.68 a share, 7% above its 1-year low

Over the past year the price has ranged from $51.04 to $100.00.

Dividend: 2.4% a year

Paid every year for at least 5 years

Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).

Five years of cash, in billions

0.5
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
2021202220232024202512 monthsto Jun '26
Revenue
$4.3bn$4.6bn$4.9bn$5.3bn$5.4bn
Operating margin
9.6%7.0%6.0%9.2%9.7%
Debt to equity
1.020.880.750.610.80
Shares outstanding
0.06bn0.06bn0.06bn0.06bn0.05bn

Health checks

  • Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
  • Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
  • Financial strength (Piotroski)8 of 9
  • Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
  • Debt0.80× equity
  • Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 9.4% a year
  • Buying back its own sharesYes, 14% fewer since 2021

The quarter to June 2026

How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.

  • Sales: $1.3 billion last quarter, about the same as a year ago.
  • Profit: $104 million, down 2% on a year ago.
  • It keeps 11 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 10 cents a year earlier.
  • Spare cash over the past 12 months: $433 million. A year earlier it spent $144 million more than it brought in.
  • 7% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
  • Debt is $1.6 billion more than cash, about the same as a year ago.
  • Sales grew on a year ago in 1 of the last 4 quarters.
Sales by quarter
Sales by quarter
Quarter toAmount
September 2024$1.3bn
December 2024$1.4bn
March 2025$1.4bn
June 2025$1.3bn
September 2025$1.3bn
December 2025$1.3bn
March 2026$1.3bn
June 2026$1.3bn
Profit by quarter
Profit by quarter
Quarter toAmount
September 2024$73m
December 2024$41m
March 2025$97m
June 2025$106m
September 2025$75m
December 2025$94m
March 2026$98m
June 2026$104m

From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.

Dates

Next results (estimated)
n/a
Last annual report (10-K)
20 November 2025
Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
5 November 2026

Who owns it

5 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 5 last quarter. 351 funds in all.

Jun '25
Dec '25
Jun '26

Sold out this quarter

Largest holders overall

From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.

Big holders and activists

5 investors own more than 5%.

From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.

What insiders did

In the last 12 months, 4 insiders bought $329,593 of shares on the open market. 2 sold $578,326, $578,326 of it under preset trading plans.

  • Link Michelle F.
    Chief of Human Resources
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    1 October 2026
    Shares
    3,208
    Price
    $54.23
    Value
    $173,970
  • Madsen Jan
    Director
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    17 March 2026
    Shares
    742
    Price
    $72.25
    Value
    $53,610
  • Caswell Bruce
    CEO & President, Director
    Bought
    Date
    10 February 2026
    Shares
    3,175
    Price
    $78.45
    Value
    $249,081
  • Mutryn David
    Chief Financial Officer
    Bought
    Date
    9 February 2026
    Shares
    1,000
    Price
    $75.63
    Value
    $75,630
  • Link Michelle F.
    Chief of Human Resources
    Sold
    under a preset trading plan
    Date
    3 December 2025
    Shares
    4,039
    Price
    $86.84
    Value
    $350,747
  • RAJAN GAYATHRI
    Director
    Bought
    Date
    28 November 2025
    Shares
    42
    Price
    $86.11
    Value
    $3,642
  • Warren Michael J.
    Director
    Bought
    Date
    28 November 2025
    Shares
    14
    Price
    $86.11
    Value
    $1,240

From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.

Warning signs in its filings

Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.

None of the serious warning signs we check for were found. 1 thing worth knowing.

We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.

We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 20 Nov 2025, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 6 later 8-Ks.

  • Changed auditor

    Worth knowing

    The company changed its auditor (the firm that checks its books) in the last two years.

    “On November 25, 2024, after the completion of a competitive selection process, the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Maximus, Inc. (the “Company”) approved (i) the dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), the Company’s current independent registered public accounting firm, effective as of the date hereof,”

    From an 8-K filed 2 December 2024: Change of auditor. Read it in the filing

A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.

What could go wrong

Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.

Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.

What changed in the risks this year

Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.

  • We may not be successful in our AI initiatives, which could adversely affect our business, reputation, and/or financial results.

    Could happen
    AI presents new risks and challenges that may affect our business. We have made, and expect to continue to make, investments to integrate AI and machine learning technology into our products and solutions, as well as to use AI to enhance our own business operations. Given the nature of AI technology, we face significant competition from other companies and an evolving regulatory landscape. Our AI efforts may not be successful and our competitors may incorporate AI into their products more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our financial results. Our competitors may be larger, more diversified, better funded, and have access to more advanced technology, including AI. These competitive advantages may enable our competition to innovate better and more quickly and to compete more effectively on quality and price, causing us to lose business and profitability. Burgeoning interest in AI may increase our competition and disrupt our business model. AI may lower barriers to entry in our industry and we may be unable to effectively compete with the products or services offered by new competitors. AI-related changes to the products and services we offer may affect our customers’ expectations, requirements, or tastes in ways we cannot adequately anticipate or adapt to, causing our business to lose sales, customers, or the ability to operate profitably and sustainably.
    Read more
  • Requirements and expectations related to the manner in which we operate our business, particularly pertaining to environmental, social and governance practices, may differ between our stakeholders, exposing us to additional costs and risks.

    Could happen
    Numerous stakeholders are taking a close interest in the manner in which we operate our business. Expectations are being set by our customers, employees, and investors on issues such as climate change and workplace culture. These expectations may affect us through specific laws or regulations in the markets in which we operate, conditions on which we bid for work or how we are evaluated as a bidder, in the manner in which we maintain our reputation with the communities we serve, and in criteria used by investors in evaluating our stock. In some cases, expectations between different parties may conflict and the expectations may evolve quickly. If we do not closely evaluate the policies we follow and clearly communicate them, we may be at risk of noncompliance with laws and regulations, reputational damage, challenges in bidding for or retaining work, difficulties in recruiting and retaining employees and business partners, and a decrease in the valuation of our stock.
    Read more
  • Our business could be adversely affected by legislative or government budgetary and spending changes, including pricing changes.

    Could happen
    These efficiency efforts are occurring in a highly volatile regulatory environment, which may limit our ability to make long-term planning decisions as these efforts may be curtailed or redirected with a change in administration or change in administration priorities. In addition, disputes over the efficiency efforts may result in legislative delays, including government shutdowns, which could result in additional costs and uncertainty. Furthermore, another prolonged government shutdown could adversely impact our operations, revenue, and cash flow, as the government may issue stop work orders on our contracts and delay payment on work already performed.
    Read more
  • We obtain most of our business through competitive bidding in response to government Requests For Proposals (RFP). We may not be awarded contracts through this process at the same level in the future as in the past, and contracts we are awarded may not be profitable.

    Could happen
    In addition, competitors may protest contracts awarded to us through the RFP process that may cause the award to be delayed, cancelled, or require the customer to reinitiate the RFP process. Any loss or delay of start-up and funding of work under protested contract awards may adversely affect our revenues and profitability. In addition, certain of our multiple-award contracts require that we make post-award efforts to obtain task orders under the contract. Because of these factors, we may not be able to obtain task orders or recognize revenue under these multiple-award contracts.
    Read more
  • Our business could be adversely affected by legislative or government budgetary and spending changes, including pricing changes.

    Could happen
    Changes in state or federal government initiatives or in the level of government spending due to budgetary or deficit considerations may have a significant impact on our future financial performance. In recent quarters, the U.S. federal government has placed a significant focus on efficiency, including with respect to contracting with private companies. These efforts may have a number of effects on our business.
    Read more

Read it in the annual report

The deep dive

Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.

  • What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
  • Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
  • The three things that would make this a mistake
  • Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Create a free account to run it

Your first deep dive is free.

What a finished deep dive looks like

Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.