Maximus
MMS on NYSE. Maximus sells services to government agencies. Market value $2.8bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to September 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing big in our quick check. See what could go wrong below.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $15.13 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 7.7 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 11 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 87 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$54.68 a share, 7% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $51.04 to $100.00.
Dividend: 2.4% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $4.3bn | $4.6bn | $4.9bn | $5.3bn | $5.4bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 9.6% | 7.0% | 6.0% | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.02 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.80 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.05bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)8 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.80× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 9.4% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 14% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.3 billion last quarter, about the same as a year ago.
- Profit: $104 million, down 2% on a year ago.
- It keeps 11 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 10 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $433 million. A year earlier it spent $144 million more than it brought in.
- 7% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $1.6 billion more than cash, about the same as a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 1 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $1.3bn |
| December 2024 | $1.4bn |
| March 2025 | $1.4bn |
| June 2025 | $1.3bn |
| September 2025 | $1.3bn |
| December 2025 | $1.3bn |
| March 2026 | $1.3bn |
| June 2026 | $1.3bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $73m |
| December 2024 | $41m |
| March 2025 | $97m |
| June 2025 | $106m |
| September 2025 | $75m |
| December 2025 | $94m |
| March 2026 | $98m |
| June 2026 | $104m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 20 November 2025
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 5 November 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 5 last quarter. 351 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $49m | <0.1% | Added |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $35m | <0.1% | Added |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $28m | 0.2% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $9m | <0.1% | Added |
| Third Avenue ManagementMatthew Fine | $4m | 0.6% | New |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$400m
- FMR$298mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$182mCut
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management$145mAdded
- State Street$138mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$127mCut
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$127mAdded
- Reinhart Partners, Llc.$107mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$85mAdded
- Van Berkom & Associates$58mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor12.3%Since 31 December 2024
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 10.6%−4.4 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.5%Since 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.2%Since 31 March 2026
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc.Passive investor5.1%Since 30 June 2026
- Victory Capital Management, Inc.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 12.3% | 31 December 2024 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 10.6%−4.4 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.5% | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. Passive investor | 5.1% | 30 June 2026 | |
Victory Capital Management, Inc. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 4 insiders bought $329,593 of shares on the open market. 2 sold $578,326, $578,326 of it under preset trading plans.
- Link Michelle F.Chief of Human ResourcesSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 1 October 2026
- Shares
- 3,208
- Price
- $54.23
- Value
- $173,970
- Madsen JanDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 17 March 2026
- Shares
- 742
- Price
- $72.25
- Value
- $53,610
- Caswell BruceCEO & President, DirectorBought
- Date
- 10 February 2026
- Shares
- 3,175
- Price
- $78.45
- Value
- $249,081
- Mutryn DavidChief Financial OfficerBought
- Date
- 9 February 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $75.63
- Value
- $75,630
- Link Michelle F.Chief of Human ResourcesSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 December 2025
- Shares
- 4,039
- Price
- $86.84
- Value
- $350,747
- RAJAN GAYATHRIDirectorBought
- Date
- 28 November 2025
- Shares
- 42
- Price
- $86.11
- Value
- $3,642
- Warren Michael J.DirectorBought
- Date
- 28 November 2025
- Shares
- 14
- Price
- $86.11
- Value
- $1,240
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 October 2026 | Link Michelle F. Chief of Human Resources | Sold under a preset trading plan | 3,208 | $54.23 | $173,970 |
| 17 March 2026 | Madsen Jan Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 742 | $72.25 | $53,610 |
| 10 February 2026 | Caswell Bruce CEO & President, Director | Bought | 3,175 | $78.45 | $249,081 |
| 9 February 2026 | Mutryn David Chief Financial Officer | Bought | 1,000 | $75.63 | $75,630 |
| 3 December 2025 | Link Michelle F. Chief of Human Resources | Sold under a preset trading plan | 4,039 | $86.84 | $350,747 |
| 28 November 2025 | RAJAN GAYATHRI Director | Bought | 42 | $86.11 | $3,642 |
| 28 November 2025 | Warren Michael J. Director | Bought | 14 | $86.11 | $1,240 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the serious warning signs we check for were found. 1 thing worth knowing.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 20 Nov 2025, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 6 later 8-Ks.
Changed auditor
Worth knowingThe company changed its auditor (the firm that checks its books) in the last two years.
“On November 25, 2024, after the completion of a competitive selection process, the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Maximus, Inc. (the “Company”) approved (i) the dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), the Company’s current independent registered public accounting firm, effective as of the date hereof,”
From an 8-K filed 2 December 2024: Change of auditor. Read it in the filing
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
We may not be successful in our AI initiatives, which could adversely affect our business, reputation, and/or financial results.
Could happenAI presents new risks and challenges that may affect our business. We have made, and expect to continue to make, investments to integrate AI and machine learning technology into our products and solutions, as well as to use AI to enhance our own business operations. Given the nature of AI technology, we face significant competition from other companies and an evolving regulatory landscape. Our AI efforts may not be successful and our competitors may incorporate AI into their products more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our financial results. Our competitors may be larger, more diversified, better funded, and have access to more advanced technology, including AI. These competitive advantages may enable our competition to innovate better and more quickly and to compete more effectively on quality and price, causing us to lose business and profitability. Burgeoning interest in AI may increase our competition and disrupt our business model. AI may lower barriers to entry in our industry and we may be unable to effectively compete with the products or services offered by new competitors. AI-related changes to the products and services we offer may affect our customers’ expectations, requirements, or tastes in ways we cannot adequately anticipate or adapt to, causing our business to lose sales, customers, or the ability to operate profitably and sustainably.
Read moreRequirements and expectations related to the manner in which we operate our business, particularly pertaining to environmental, social and governance practices, may differ between our stakeholders, exposing us to additional costs and risks.
Could happenNumerous stakeholders are taking a close interest in the manner in which we operate our business. Expectations are being set by our customers, employees, and investors on issues such as climate change and workplace culture. These expectations may affect us through specific laws or regulations in the markets in which we operate, conditions on which we bid for work or how we are evaluated as a bidder, in the manner in which we maintain our reputation with the communities we serve, and in criteria used by investors in evaluating our stock. In some cases, expectations between different parties may conflict and the expectations may evolve quickly. If we do not closely evaluate the policies we follow and clearly communicate them, we may be at risk of noncompliance with laws and regulations, reputational damage, challenges in bidding for or retaining work, difficulties in recruiting and retaining employees and business partners, and a decrease in the valuation of our stock.
Read moreOur business could be adversely affected by legislative or government budgetary and spending changes, including pricing changes.
Could happenThese efficiency efforts are occurring in a highly volatile regulatory environment, which may limit our ability to make long-term planning decisions as these efforts may be curtailed or redirected with a change in administration or change in administration priorities. In addition, disputes over the efficiency efforts may result in legislative delays, including government shutdowns, which could result in additional costs and uncertainty. Furthermore, another prolonged government shutdown could adversely impact our operations, revenue, and cash flow, as the government may issue stop work orders on our contracts and delay payment on work already performed.
Read moreWe obtain most of our business through competitive bidding in response to government Requests For Proposals (RFP). We may not be awarded contracts through this process at the same level in the future as in the past, and contracts we are awarded may not be profitable.
Could happenIn addition, competitors may protest contracts awarded to us through the RFP process that may cause the award to be delayed, cancelled, or require the customer to reinitiate the RFP process. Any loss or delay of start-up and funding of work under protested contract awards may adversely affect our revenues and profitability. In addition, certain of our multiple-award contracts require that we make post-award efforts to obtain task orders under the contract. Because of these factors, we may not be able to obtain task orders or recognize revenue under these multiple-award contracts.
Read moreOur business could be adversely affected by legislative or government budgetary and spending changes, including pricing changes.
Could happenChanges in state or federal government initiatives or in the level of government spending due to budgetary or deficit considerations may have a significant impact on our future financial performance. In recent quarters, the U.S. federal government has placed a significant focus on efficiency, including with respect to contracting with private companies. These efforts may have a number of effects on our business.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.