Vail Resorts
MTN on NYSE. Vail Resorts sells ski resort access, lodging, and real estate to skiers and vacationers. Market value $5.0bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to July 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to July 2026.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $5.00 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 19.9 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 11 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 74 of 100. Price score: 62 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$139.30 a share, 18% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $118.51 to $163.34.
Dividend: 6.4% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $2.5bn | $2.9bn | $2.9bn | $3.0bn | $2.8bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 23.8% | 17.5% | 16.9% | 18.9% | 14.8% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.96 | 3.22 | 4.52 | 8.52 | 15.10 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 7 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt15.10× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 8.2% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 8% fewer since 2022
The quarter to July 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $278 million last quarter, up 3% on a year ago.
- A loss of $190 million, compared with a loss of $181 million a year ago.
- It keeps 15 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 19 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $248 million, down from $320 million.
- Debt is $3.4 billion more than cash, up from $3.2 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 2 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $260m |
| January 2025 | $1.1bn |
| April 2025 | $1.3bn |
| July 2025 | $271m |
| October 2025 | $271m |
| January 2026 | $1.1bn |
| April 2026 | $1.2bn |
| July 2026 | $278m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | -$173m |
| January 2025 | $244m |
| April 2025 | $390m |
| July 2025 | -$181m |
| October 2025 | -$187m |
| January 2026 | $210m |
| April 2026 | $314m |
| July 2026 | -$190m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 28 September 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 7 September 2026
Who owns it
9 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 9 last quarter. 438 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oasis ManagementSeth Fischer | $317m | 36.9% | Added |
| First Pacific Advisors (FPA)Steven Romick | $178m | 2.2% | Added |
| Harris Associates (Oakmark)Bill Nygren | $104m | 0.1% | Added |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $23m | <0.1% | Added |
| Ariel InvestmentsJohn Rogers Jr. | $15m | 0.1% | Cut |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $14m | <0.1% | Added |
| Marathon Asset ManagementNeil Ostrer | $13m | 0.5% | Cut |
| First Eagle Investment ManagementMatthew McLennan | $6m | <0.1% | Added |
| Heartland AdvisorsBill Nasgovitz | $3m | 0.2% | Cut |
Largest holders overall
- Bamco$890mAdded
- Capital World Investors$593m
- Capital International Investors$520mCut
- BlackRock$465m
- Oasis Management$317mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$236mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$231m
- Vanguard Capital Management$218m
- UBS Group AG$205mAdded
- First Pacific Advisors (FPA)$178mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%; 1 of them is pushing for change.
- Baron Capital Group, Inc.Passive investorat least 18.3%+4.2 pts(filed with 5 related holders)Since 30 June 2026
- Capital World InvestorsPassive investor12.1%+3.7 ptsSince 30 January 2026
- Capital International InvestorsPassive investor11.4%−2.0 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- at least 9.0%+1.6 pts(filed with 5 related holders)Since 25 September 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 31 March 2026
- Baron Growth FundPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Baron Capital Group, Inc. Passive investor | at least 18.3%+4.2 pts (filed with 5 related holders) | 30 June 2026 | |
Capital World Investors Passive investor | 12.1%+3.7 pts | 30 January 2026 | |
Capital International Investors Passive investor | 11.4%−2.0 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
at least 9.0%+1.6 pts (filed with 5 related holders) | 25 September 2026 | ||
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
Baron Growth Fund Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 2 insiders bought $5m of shares on the open market.
- Korch Angela AEVP & Chief Financial OfficerBought
- Date
- 16 March 2026
- Shares
- 190
- Price
- $131.85
- Value
- $25,052
- KATZ ROBERT ACEO & Chairperson of the Board, DirectorBought
- Date
- 16 March 2026
- Shares
- 37,500
- Price
- $131.81
- Value
- $5m
- Korch Angela AEVP & Chief Financial OfficerBought
- Date
- 7 October 2025
- Shares
- 210
- Price
- $155.00
- Value
- $32,550
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 March 2026 | Korch Angela A EVP & Chief Financial Officer | Bought | 190 | $131.85 | $25,052 |
| 16 March 2026 | KATZ ROBERT A CEO & Chairperson of the Board, Director | Bought | 37,500 | $131.81 | $5m |
| 7 October 2025 | Korch Angela A EVP & Chief Financial Officer | Bought | 210 | $155.00 | $32,550 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 28 Sep 2026, and no later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
- It carries a lot of debt: 15.1× its equity.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Activist stockholders could cause our business to incur significant expense, hinder execution of our business strategy and impact our stock price as a result of a threatened proxy contest or other actions.
Could happenWhile we value constructive input from our stockholders and regularly engage in dialogue with our stockholders regarding our governance practices, strategy, and performance, the Company has been subject and may in the future be subject to actions from activist stockholders that may not align with our business strategies or the interests of our other stockholders. Recently, the Company received two nominations totaling five director candidates to stand for election at the Company’s 2026 annual meeting. Responding to actions by such activist stockholders or others could be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of our board of directors and senior management team, especially where an activist or bidder advocates for corporate actions that may not align with our current business strategies and the best interests of all of our stockholders. In addition, actual or perceived uncertainties as to our future direction caused by activist activities may cause or appear to cause instability, potentially making it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and identify and secure investment opportunities. Activist stockholder activities may also cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions, or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the fundamental underlying value of our business.
Read moreActivist stockholders could cause our business to incur significant expense, hinder execution of our business strategy and impact our stock price as a result of a threatened proxy contest or other actions.
Could happenPublicly traded companies are increasingly subject to campaigns by activist stockholders advocating corporate actions such as operational and financial restructuring, increased borrowing, special dividends, share repurchases, governance or management changes, sales of assets or entire segments, or business combination transactions. Activist stockholders have and may in the future seek to effect change through various strategies that range from private engagement to public campaigns, proxy solicitations, advance stockholder proposals, proxy contests or otherwise attempt to assert influence on our board of directors and management.
Read moreWe are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and our use of hedging instruments may not fully mitigate our exposure to these fluctuations and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenAdditionally, we have entered into derivatives to manage our exposure to interest rate and currency movements, specifically to hedge our net investment in Swiss Franc denominated subsidiaries, which we may elect to expand to other subsidiaries denominated in other foreign currencies. We cannot anticipate all of our foreign currency exposures, ensure that any hedges will fully offset the impact of foreign currency exchange or interest rate fluctuations, or that our hedging strategy will successfully or fully insulate us from foreign currency exchange or interest rate risk. Accounting or regulatory changes, market disruptions or rapid rate movements, defaults or early termination events could increase the cost of maintaining or replacing these hedges or limit their effectiveness, which could negatively impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Further, our hedging objectives could result in increased volatility in our GAAP results. Since some of our hedging activity addresses long-term exposures, such as our net investment in our subsidiaries, the gains or losses on those hedges could be recognized before the offsetting exposure materializes, potentially causing volatility in our cash or debt balances, and therefore our leverage. If we fail to accurately forecast our results of operations, execute contracts that effectively mitigate our economic exposure to interest rates and currency rates fluctuations, or comply with the complex accounting requirements for hedging, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Read moreWe may not realize the anticipated benefits of our RET plan, and our efforts to improve organizational effectiveness — including through outsourcing, global shared services, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence and other technologies — may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business.
Could happenIf the RET initiatives does not achieve its intended results, or if it results in unintended consequences, our business, financial condition, operations, reputation, and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
We are increasingly incorporating AI technologies into our business operations, which creates new and evolving risks that could adversely affect our business and reputation.
Could happenWe have integrated and expect to continue to further integrate AI and machine learning technologies into various aspects of our business operations. Due to the nascent nature of AI, its use may present evolving risks that are not yet fully identifiable. For example, AI models may be flawed or rely on datasets that are insufficient, inaccurate, or biased, and may produce outputs that are incorrect, misleading, or otherwise inappropriate AI models and services also may require access to large volumes of data, including personal information, which may heighten risks relating to data privacy, data security, and the protection of proprietary and third-party intellectual property. AI and machine learning tools may also be used improperly by our employees in the course of carrying out their responsibilities. There is also no assurance that use of AI will produce the efficiencies, cost savings or other benefits we anticipate.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.