Oneok

None of the warning signs we check for were found.

We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.

We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 24 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 4 Aug 2026 and 6 later 8-Ks.

Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.

Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.

• We may face significant costs to comply with the regulation of GHG emissions.

  Could happen

  We believe it is likely that future governmental legislation and/or regulation on the federal, state and regional levels, may further require us to limit GHG emissions associated with our operations, pay additional fees associated with our GHG emissions or purchase allowances for such emissions. In the past, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) had directed the EPA to impose and collect payment of “Waste Emissions Charges,” or “Methane Fees,” for specific facilities that report more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent of GHG emissions per year and have a methane emissions intensity in excess of the relevant statutory threshold. However, the new administration issued an executive order directing the heads of all federal agencies to identify and begin the processes to suspend, revise or rescind all agency actions that are unduly burdensome on the identification, development or use of domestic energy resources. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed July 4, 2025, Table of C ontents suspended the Methane Fee. Additionally, on February 12, 2026, the EPA issued a final rule eliminating the 2009 GHG endangerment finding, which underpins U.S. federal regulation of GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act. The final rule is expected to be subject to extensive litigation. Consequently, future implementation and enforcement of these rules remain uncertain at this time. Methane Fees, if implemented, and other legislative and/or regulatory initiatives that increase our costs or the complexity or compliance burden of business could make some of our activities uneconomic to maintain or operate. However, we cannot predict precisely what form these future legislative and/or regulatory initiatives will take, the stringency of such initiatives, when they will become effective or the impact on our capital expenditures, competitive position and results of operations. Further, we may not be able to pass on the higher costs to our customers or recover all costs related to complying with GHG legislative and/or regulatory requirements. Our future results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected if such costs are not recovered or otherwise passed on to our customers.

  Read moreShow less

• Our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health and safety and the environment, which may expose us to significant costs and liabilities. Increased litigation and activism challenging continued reliance upon oil and gas as well as changes to and/or increased penalties from the enforcement of laws, regulations and policies could adversely impact our business.

  Could happen

  • National Environmental Policy Act and analogous state laws that establish requirements for certain environmental analyses prior to major government actions, including discretionary permits;

• Our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health and safety and the environment, which may expose us to significant costs and liabilities. Increased litigation and activism challenging continued reliance upon oil and gas as well as changes to and/or increased penalties from the enforcement of laws, regulations and policies could adversely impact our business.

  Could happen

  Upon entering office, the new administration issued a series of executive orders that signal a shift in the United States’ energy, environmental and climate change policy. Among other directives, such executive orders: (i) direct federal agencies to identify and exercise emergency authorities to facilitate conventional energy production, transportation and refining and call for the use of emergency regulations to expedite energy infrastructure projects; (ii) promote energy explorations and production on federal lands and waters; (iii) mandate a review of existing regulations that may burden domestic energy development; and (iv) rescission of funds and programs related to the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. We continue to assess the long-term impacts of such actions on our operations, if any. However, such actions may prompt various states and other policymakers to take more stringent action on such matters. Therefore, the net impact of any developments is difficult to predict with any certainty.

  Read moreShow less

• Scrutiny and conflicting stakeholder expectations regarding ESG issues, including climate change, may impact our business.

  Could happen

  We engage in various efforts to respond to stakeholder expectations; however, such efforts may not have the desired effect. Many of these efforts rely on methodologies, assumptions and data (including third-party information) that are subject to varying interpretations or that continue to evolve, including in ways we cannot control. Our approach may also continue to evolve, and we cannot guarantee that our approach will align with the expectations or preferences of any particular stakeholder. For example, our emissions reduction targets depend on a range of factors, and to the extent these do not manifest or we otherwise are unable to make progress on such targets or other initiatives, we may face additional costs or be unable to meet our targets, which could negatively impact our business and reputation. Various of our business partners and other stakeholders are subject to similar expectations on ESG matters, which may exacerbate or result in additional risks.

  Read moreShow less