Omnicom Group
OMC on NYSE. Omnicom sells advertising and marketing services to businesses. Market value $20.6bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Not a fit for our list right now
Why it could be worth it
See Media & telecom stocks that passed both tests
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $11.60 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 20.7 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 33 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 99 of 100. Price score: 61 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$75.10 a share, 13% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $66.33 to $89.57.
Expected to report results Tuesday 20 Oct, after the market closes.
Dividend: 2.7% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $14.3bn | $14.3bn | $14.7bn | $15.7bn | $17.3bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 15.4% | 14.6% | 14.3% | 14.5% | 2.6% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.61 | 1.48 | 0.78 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.20bn | 0.20bn | 0.20bn | 0.19bn | 0.29bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Warning signs
- Financial strength (Piotroski)2 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.78× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 5.6% a year
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 40% more shares since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $6.6 billion last quarter, up 63% on a year ago.
- Profit: $585 million, up 127% on a year ago.
- It keeps 5 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 14 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $2.4 billion, up from $1.8 billion.
- 43% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $3.9bn |
| December 2024 | $4.3bn |
| March 2025 | $3.7bn |
| June 2025 | $4.0bn |
| September 2025 | $4.0bn |
| December 2025 | $5.5bn |
| March 2026 | $6.2bn |
| June 2026 | $6.6bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $386m |
| December 2024 | $448m |
| March 2025 | $288m |
| June 2025 | $258m |
| September 2025 | $341m |
| December 2025 | -$941m |
| March 2026 | $405m |
| June 2026 | $585m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 20 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 20 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 28 October 2026
Who owns it
16 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 16 last quarter. 1,096 funds in all.
- Cooke & BielerCooke & Bieler partners
- Value
- $165m
- Share of fund
- 1.9%
- Cullen Capital ManagementJames Cullen
- Value
- $86m
- Share of fund
- 0.8%
- Brandes Investment PartnersCharles Brandes
- Value
- $85m
- Share of fund
- 0.6%
- GMOJeremy Grantham
- Value
- $23m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $13m
- Share of fund
- 0.1%
- Jensen Investment ManagementEric Schoenstein
- Value
- $2m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Eagle Investment ManagementMatthew McLennan | $1.1bn | 0.9% | Added |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $500m | 1.5% | Added |
| Beutel GoodmanBeutel Goodman team | $225m | 1.7% | Cut |
| Cooke & BielerCooke & Bieler partners | $165m | 1.9% | |
| Cullen Capital ManagementJames Cullen | $86m | 0.8% | |
| Ariel InvestmentsJohn Rogers Jr. | $86m | 0.9% | Added |
| Brandes Investment PartnersCharles Brandes | $85m | 0.6% | |
| Sound Shore ManagementHarry Burn | $82m | 2.5% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $76m | <0.1% | Added |
| Cambiar InvestorsBrian Barish | $38m | 1.7% | New |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $29m | <0.1% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $23m | <0.1% | |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $13m | 0.1% | |
| Jensen Investment ManagementEric Schoenstein | $2m | <0.1% | |
| Delphi ManagementScott Black | $368,000 | 0.4% | Added |
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $299,674 | <0.1% | Cut |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$2.1bnCut
- State Street$1.8bnCut
- Vanguard Capital Management$1.4bnCut
- First Eagle Investment Management$1.1bnAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$982mCut
- Bank of New York Mellon$914mAdded
- JPMorgan Chase$893m
- Geode Capital Management$628mCut
- Massachusetts Financial Services$612mCut
- FMR$558mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
3 investors own more than 5%.
- STATE STREET CORPORATIONPassive investorat least 8.6%−1.1 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor8.2%Since 31 March 2026
- Wellington Management Group LLPPassive investorat least 2.3%(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 March 2025
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
STATE STREET CORPORATION Passive investor | at least 8.6%−1.1 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 8.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
Wellington Management Group LLP Passive investor | at least 2.3% (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 March 2025 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 1 sold $237,808.
- RICE LINDA JOHNSONDirectorSold
- Date
- 24 August 2026
- Shares
- 1,385
- Price
- $88.73
- Value
- $122,891
- RICE LINDA JOHNSONDirectorSold
- Date
- 2 March 2026
- Shares
- 1,348
- Price
- $85.25
- Value
- $114,917
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 August 2026 | RICE LINDA JOHNSON Director | Sold | 1,385 | $88.73 | $122,891 |
| 2 March 2026 | RICE LINDA JOHNSON Director | Sold | 1,348 | $85.25 | $114,917 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 20 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 29 Jul 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
- Its accounts show patterns that sometimes come before companies have to correct past results (Beneish score).
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our liquidity, long-term financing needs, credit rating and access to capital markets is dependent on our agencies, operating cash flow.
Could happenOur agencies’ operating cash flows have a significant impact on our liquidity and access to short-term and long-term financing in the capital markets. We maintain a committed, unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facility, which also provides us with the ability to issue commercial paper, and to manage and support our operating liquidity in the short term. In addition, we issue senior long-term notes in the capital markets. If our agencies’ operating cash flow significantly declines or any of these sources were unavailable to us or insufficient, our liquidity and ability to refinance our long-term debt could be impeded. We could be required to restructure our debt, sell assets or take other actions, and our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, our credit rating, which is also dependent on our agencies operating cash flows among other factors, has a direct effect on our ability to obtain bank financing and access the capital markets. A downgrade to our credit rating, for any reason, could increase our borrowing costs, reduce our capacity to borrow, or impede our ability to access the capital markets, and our results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected. See Part II for further discussion of our liquidity and capital resources.
Read moreChanges in tax rates, tax laws, regulations or interpretations, or adverse outcomes of tax audits or proceedings could materially adversely affect our effective tax rate, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Could happenOur effective tax rate and cash flows could also be adversely affected by changes in tax laws or policies, including changes to statutory tax rates, digital services taxes, the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws, or the adoption or modification of global minimum tax regimes, such as the Global Anti-Base Erosion issued by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. These developments could increase tax complexity and uncertainty and may require us to restructure operations or intercompany arrangements, potentially resulting in increased tax expense or reduced cash flows.
Read moreFailure to adapt to technological developments, including emerging technologies such as generative AI and agentic AI, could adversely affect our competitive position, reputation, client relationships, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenOur industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. Our ability to remain competitive depends in part on our ability to anticipate, develop, acquire and integrate new technologies, platforms and capabilities, including data-driven solutions, automation, generative AI and agentic AI. These technologies may require significant and ongoing investment, involve long development cycles and uncertain returns, and may not be accepted by clients or generate expected benefits.
Read moreChanges in tax rates, tax laws, regulations or interpretations, or adverse outcomes of tax audits or proceedings could materially adversely affect our effective tax rate, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Could happenWe operate in numerous jurisdictions and are subject to a complex and evolving global tax environment. The determination of our tax liabilities requires significant judgment, including with respect to the application of tax laws, transfer pricing arrangements, valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the interpretation of new or existing tax regulations. Tax authorities may challenge our positions, and adverse outcomes from audits, investigations or litigation could result in additional tax liabilities, penalties or interest that differ materially from amounts previously recorded.
Read moreCompliance with ever evolving federal, state, and foreign laws, regulations and other requirements relating to the handling of information about individuals involves significant expenditure and resources, and any failure by us or our vendors to comply could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenRegulators and legislators in the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States have increasingly focused on the use of online tracking technologies and the sharing of personal information with third parties for targeted or behavioral advertising. This has resulted in new or updated requirements under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and other U.S. state privacy laws. If these laws or regulations are adopted, interpreted, or enforced in a manner that restricts our current practices, or if private market participants impose limitations on tracking technologies in response to privacy concerns, our digital services could become less effective, more costly to deliver, or subject to additional legal and operational constraints.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.