OP Bancorp
OPBK on Nasdaq. OP Bancorp sells banking services to small businesses, their owners, and retail customers. Market value $227m.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 13 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $0.95.
Profit per $100 you pay: $12.73.
Quality score: 95 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$15.23 a share, 23% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $12.41 to $16.83.
Dividend: 3.1% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $2m | $2m | $2m | $3m | $3m |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.02bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 17.5% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $515,000 last quarter, down 49% on a year ago.
- Profit: $8 million, up 26% on a year ago.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $27 million, up from $14 million.
- 1% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
- Sales did not grow on a year ago in any of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $889,000 |
| December 2024 | $967,000 |
| March 2025 | $1m |
| June 2025 | $1m |
| September 2025 | $725,000 |
| December 2025 | $462,000 |
| March 2026 | $463,000 |
| June 2026 | $515,000 |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $5m |
| December 2024 | $5m |
| March 2025 | $6m |
| June 2025 | $6m |
| September 2025 | $7m |
| December 2025 | $7m |
| March 2026 | $7m |
| June 2026 | $8m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 13 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 6 November 2026
Who owns it
2 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 2 last quarter. 98 funds in all.
- LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok
- Value
- $980,000
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners
- Value
- $596,662
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $980,000 | <0.1% | |
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $596,662 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- Diversify Advisory Services$29mNew
- Diversify Wealth Management$29m
- BlackRock$15mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$10mAdded
- Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, the$8m
- Vanguard Capital Management$8mCut
- Alliancebernstein L.P.$7mCut
- Geode Capital Management$5mAdded
- Acadian Asset Management$4mAdded
- Maltese Capital Management$4m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor5.5%Since 30 June 2026
- AllianceBernstein L.P.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 5.5% | 30 June 2026 | |
AllianceBernstein L.P. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 2 sold $322,275.
- Oh Christine YoonChief Operating OfficerSold
- Date
- 12 June 2026
- Shares
- 1,549
- Price
- $14.20
- Value
- $21,996
- Oh Christine YoonChief Operating OfficerSold
- Date
- 11 June 2026
- Shares
- 8,251
- Price
- $14.08
- Value
- $116,174
- Oh Christine YoonChief Operating OfficerSold
- Date
- 10 June 2026
- Shares
- 12,018
- Price
- $14.29
- Value
- $171,737
- Park JaehyunChief Financial OfficerSold
- Date
- 12 March 2026
- Shares
- 958
- Price
- $12.91
- Value
- $12,368
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 June 2026 | Oh Christine Yoon Chief Operating Officer | Sold | 1,549 | $14.20 | $21,996 |
| 11 June 2026 | Oh Christine Yoon Chief Operating Officer | Sold | 8,251 | $14.08 | $116,174 |
| 10 June 2026 | Oh Christine Yoon Chief Operating Officer | Sold | 12,018 | $14.29 | $171,737 |
| 12 March 2026 | Park Jaehyun Chief Financial Officer | Sold | 958 | $12.91 | $12,368 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 13 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 7 Aug 2026 and 3 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The provisions of our subordinated debt documents restrict our ability to pay dividends or repurchase our stock in certain circumstances.
Could happenOn November 7, 2025, we issued a 7.50% fixed-to-floating subordinated note (“Note”) in the amount of $25.0 million. The Note matures on November 1, 2035 and the interest rate thereunder will reset to a floating rate as of November 1, 2030. The Note prohibits our payment of dividends or the repurchase of our capital stock at any time when an event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Note. Thus, at times when we are not in material compliance with the terms of the Note we will be required to suspend the payment of dividends and other distributions on our capital stock, and we may not engage in stock repurchase programs. These factors, alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may adversely affect the price or trading volumes of our capital stock.
Read moreOur operations could be disrupted by our third‑party service providers, including risks arising from their use of artificial intelligence technologies, experiencing difficulty in providing their services, terminating their services, or failing to comply with banking regulations.
Could happenWe depend to a significant extent on relationships with third‑party service providers. Specifically, we utilize third‑party core banking services and receive credit card and debit card services, branch capture services, Internet banking services and services complementary to our banking products from various third‑party service providers. Certain of these third‑party service providers may incorporate or rely on artificial intelligence (“AI”), machine learning, automated decision‑making technologies or similar emerging technologies in the development or delivery of their products and services, including technologies that are evolving rapidly and for which regulatory expectations are continuing to develop. These third‑party relationships are subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements that require us to maintain and continue to enhance our due diligence, contractual controls, and ongoing monitoring and oversight of our vendors, including with respect to their information security practices, data governance, model risk management, operational resilience and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The use of AI by our third‑party service providers may increase the complexity of these oversight obligations and may expose us to additional risks, including risks related to data privacy and security, model performance, bias or discrimination, explainability, intellectual property, and regulatory compliance. We may be required to renegotiate or modify our agreements to address these enhanced requirements or evolving supervisory expectations, which could increase our costs or may be impracticable. If our service providers experience operational difficulties, fail to perform in accordance with expectations, experience disruptions related to AI system failures or errors, suffer a cyberattack or other security breach, fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations, or terminate their services, and we are unable to replace them in a timely manner, our operations could be interrupted. It may be difficult for us to replace certain service providers promptly, particularly where the services involve specialized technologies or proprietary platforms, including AI‑enabled systems, and replacement services may be available only at higher cost or on less favorable terms.
Read moreOur operations could be disrupted by our third‑party service providers, including risks arising from their use of artificial intelligence technologies, experiencing difficulty in providing their services, terminating their services, or failing to comply with banking regulations.
Could happenIn addition, many of our agreements with third‑party service providers limit our ability to recover damages, even for negligent actions that may result in customer harm, regulatory scrutiny, or enforcement actions. Regulatory requirements generally apply directly to financial institutions rather than to their service providers, and we expect that our regulators would hold us responsible for deficiencies in or failures of our third‑party relationships, including deficiencies related to the use of AI technologies by those providers. Such deficiencies could result in supervisory findings, enforcement actions, civil money penalties, litigation, customer remediation obligations, reputational harm, or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreOur operations and financial performance may be adversely affected by a prolonged or recurring shutdown of the U.S. federal government.
Could happenA federal government shutdown could adversely affect customers that depend on government contracts, grants, or other government-related revenue, which may impair their ability to service loans or increase deposit withdrawals. In addition, shutdowns may delay the processing of government‑backed loans and the recognition of related income. In particular, the SBA typically suspends approvals under its core programs, including the 7(a) and 504 programs, during a shutdown, delaying loan closings and creating uncertainty for borrowers and lenders. Although we may continue internal processing and underwriting, final approvals and disbursements depend on SBA system availability. The timing, duration, and frequency of government shutdowns are unpredictable, and prolonged disruptions could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Read moreVolatility and uncertainty in interest rates have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, our loan portfolio, interest income, and financial condition, and may result in increased credit losses or higher provision expense.
Although the Federal Reserve Open Markets Committee (commonly referred to as “the Fed”) has recently made modest incremental reductions in benchmark interest rates, the current interest rate environment remains significantly elevated from that of the recent past, and recent indications as of the date of this report are that further reductions are uncertain as to both timing and degree. Interest rates affect both our ability to reprice variable-rate loans and to originate new fixed-rate loans, and in times of significant uncertainty about interest rates, such as the present, clients and prospective investors often reduce their borrowing levels, which tends to have a deflating effect on our outstanding loan balances and thus on our interest income.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.