Oshkosh
OSK on NYSE. Oshkosh sells vehicles and equipment to construction, firefighting, defense and delivery workers. Market value $8.2bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $14.20 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 11.1 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 15 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 91 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$132.67 a share, 14% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $116.77 to $180.49.
Dividend: 1.6% a year
Paid every year for 4 years
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $1.2 billion in the past 12 months, $618 million in the year to December 2025.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $7.7bn | $8.3bn | $9.7bn | $10.7bn | $10.4bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 7.7% | 4.5% | 8.7% | 9.4% | 9.0% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.07bn | 0.07bn | 0.07bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.26× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 8.3% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 5% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $2.9 billion last quarter, up 7% on a year ago.
- Profit: $183 million, down 11% on a year ago.
- It keeps 8 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 9 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $1.2 billion, up from $589 million.
- 3% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $699 million more than cash, down from $1.3 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 3 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $2.7bn |
| December 2024 | $2.6bn |
| March 2025 | $2.3bn |
| June 2025 | $2.7bn |
| September 2025 | $2.7bn |
| December 2025 | $2.7bn |
| March 2026 | $2.3bn |
| June 2026 | $2.9bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $180m |
| December 2024 | $153m |
| March 2025 | $112m |
| June 2025 | $205m |
| September 2025 | $196m |
| December 2025 | $134m |
| March 2026 | $43m |
| June 2026 | $183m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 17 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 27 October 2026
Who owns it
12 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 12 last quarter. 597 funds in all.
- Greenhaven AssociatesEdgar Wachenheim III
- Value
- $393m
- Share of fund
- 4.5%
- Mairs & PowerAndy Adams
- Value
- $5m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $2m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- Harris Associates (Oakmark)Bill Nygren
- Value
- $241,731
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aristotle Capital ManagementHoward Gleicher | $725m | 1.5% | Cut |
| Greenhaven AssociatesEdgar Wachenheim III | $393m | 4.5% | |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $327m | 0.6% | Added |
| Pzena Investment ManagementRichard Pzena | $64m | 0.2% | Cut |
| Horizon KineticsMurray Stahl | $14m | 0.2% | Cut |
| Atlantic Investment ManagementAlex Roepers | $13m | 6.7% | Cut |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $13m | <0.1% | Cut |
| SouthernSun Asset ManagementMichael Cook | $7m | 0.9% | Added |
| Mairs & PowerAndy Adams | $5m | <0.1% | |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $3m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $2m | <0.1% | |
| Harris Associates (Oakmark)Bill Nygren | $241,731 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$914mCut
- Aristotle Capital Management$725mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$668mAdded
- AQR Capital Management$518mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$492mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$432m
- Greenhaven Associates$393m
- LSV Asset Management$327mAdded
- State Street$320m
- Invesco$295mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor9.0%Since 31 March 2025
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.8%Since 31 March 2026
- AQR Capital Management, LLCPassive investorat least 5.4%(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.2%Since 31 March 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investor5.1%Since 30 June 2026
- Aristotle Capital ManagementPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 July 2026
- Victory Capital Management, Inc.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 September 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 9.0% | 31 March 2025 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.8% | 31 March 2026 | |
AQR Capital Management, LLC Passive investor | at least 5.4% (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | 5.1% | 30 June 2026 | |
Aristotle Capital Management Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 July 2026 | |
Victory Capital Management, Inc. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 September 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 5 sold $2m, $184,299 of it under preset trading plans.
- Pfeifer John CDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 11 September 2026
- Shares
- 778
- Price
- $150.00
- Value
- $116,700
- Palmer DuncanDirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 12 May 2026
- Shares
- 505
- Price
- $133.86
- Value
- $67,599
- Khare AnupamSVP/Chief Information OfficerSold
- Date
- 27 February 2026
- Shares
- 4,000
- Price
- $169.08
- Value
- $676,281
- Verich John SSVP Bus Devl and TreasurerSold
- Date
- 20 February 2026
- Shares
- 1,050
- Price
- $176.99
- Value
- $185,840
- Cortina Ignacio AEVP, CL&AO & SecretarySold
- Date
- 21 November 2025
- Shares
- 8,000
- Price
- $124.41
- Value
- $995,280
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 September 2026 | Pfeifer John C Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 778 | $150.00 | $116,700 |
| 12 May 2026 | Palmer Duncan Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 505 | $133.86 | $67,599 |
| 27 February 2026 | Khare Anupam SVP/Chief Information Officer | Sold | 4,000 | $169.08 | $676,281 |
| 20 February 2026 | Verich John S SVP Bus Devl and Treasurer | Sold | 1,050 | $176.99 | $185,840 |
| 21 November 2025 | Cortina Ignacio A EVP, CL&AO & Secretary | Sold | 8,000 | $124.41 | $995,280 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 17 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 28 Jul 2026 and 4 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our use of artificial intelligence and autonomy technologies may expose us to additional risks and may not deliver the benefits we anticipate.
Could happenWe are developing, integrating and using artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomy in certain products, services and internal operations. These technologies are evolving and, in many cases, rely on third-party tools, data, software or infrastructure. Our ability to realize benefits from their use depends on factors such as data quality, system integration, workforce adoption, computing resources and the ongoing performance and availability of third-party technology providers. AI-enabled systems may not perform as intended under all operating conditions and may generate inaccurate, incomplete or biased outputs. As these technologies are introduced into products, services or operations, failures or perceived failures, whether due to design limitations, data constraints, integration challenges, cybersecurity incidents, operator misuse, inadequate training or other causes, could result in product performance issues, safety incidents, increased costs, reputational harm or reduced customer acceptance. In addition, the legal and regulatory framework governing AI and data use is rapidly evolving and remains uncertain. New or changing laws, regulations or standards could increase compliance costs, limit permissible uses, require changes to product design or governance practices or expose us to litigation or enforcement actions. If we are unable to effectively develop, integrate, govern or manage AI-enabled technologies, or if these technologies fail to deliver benefits we expect, our results of operations, financial condition or competitive position could be adversely affected.
Read moreOur dependency on contracts with U.S. and foreign government agencies subjects us to a variety of risks that could materially reduce our revenues or profits or impact our capital allocation strategy.
Could happenIn January 2026, the U.S. President issued an executive order directing the DoD and other defense-related agencies to prioritize the warfighter in procurement decisions, including increased emphasis on speed of delivery, affordability, domestic sourcing and operational readiness. While intended to enhance military effectiveness, this directive could result in changes to acquisition strategies, contract structures, technical requirements, pricing expectations or supplier selection criteria. Such changes could increase competition, reduce margins, accelerate delivery schedules or require additional capital investments, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our net sales, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. Under the executive order, the DoD could also impose conditions or otherwise create disincentives that could limit our ability to repurchase shares of our Common Stock or to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Read moreChanges in trade policies and other factors beyond our control may adversely impact our results.
Already happenedThe United States has announced changes to U.S. trade policies, including increasing tariffs on imports and potentially renegotiating or terminating existing trade agreements. The exact scope and duration of any such tariffs that have been or will ultimately be implemented, or retaliatory tariffs that have been or could be implemented by other countries on U.S. exports, is not known, and the impacts on our business are uncertain. Tariffs implemented by the U.S. during 2025 cost us approximately $35 million in 2025, and we estimate that will increase to approximately $200 million in 2026. Geopolitical tensions and trade wars can disrupt supply chains and increase the cost of our products, which could cause our products to be more expensive for customers. Countries have adopted restrictive trade measures such as tariffs, taxation, foreign exchange controls, capital controls and controls on imports or exports of goods, technology or data, any of which could adversely affect our operations and supply chain or limit our ability to offer our products and services as intended.
Read moreOur performance under our United States Postal Service (USPS) contract may not be what we expect.
Could happenThe USPS ordering fewer units than we expect which could result in an impairment of our deferred contract asset. We estimate that deferred contract costs exceed future profits on existing orders by approximately $135 million at December 31, 2025.
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.