Phinia
PHIN on NYSE. PHINIA sells engine components and aftermarket parts to vehicle manufacturers. Market value $2.2bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing big in our quick check. See what could go wrong below.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $11.23 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 11.4 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 9 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 71 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$60.76 a share, 20% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $50.79 to $86.93.
Dividend: 1.9% a year
Paid every year for 3 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||
| Revenue | $3.5bn | $3.4bn | $3.5bn |
| Operating margin | |||
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 7.6% | 7.3% |
| Debt to equity | |||
| Debt to equity | 0.42 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| Shares outstanding | |||
| Shares outstanding | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive3 of 3 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)7 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.61× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsUnknown
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 13% fewer since 2023
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $940 million last quarter, up 6% on a year ago.
- Profit: $40 million, down 13% on a year ago.
- It keeps 7 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 8 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $250 million, up from $151 million.
- 5% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $653 million more than cash, up from $646 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $839m |
| December 2024 | $833m |
| March 2025 | $796m |
| June 2025 | $890m |
| September 2025 | $908m |
| December 2025 | $889m |
| March 2026 | $878m |
| June 2026 | $940m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $31m |
| December 2024 | $5m |
| March 2025 | $26m |
| June 2025 | $46m |
| September 2025 | $13m |
| December 2025 | $45m |
| March 2026 | $37m |
| June 2026 | $40m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 12 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 29 October 2026
Who owns it
10 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 10 last quarter. 392 funds in all.
- LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok
- Value
- $116m
- Share of fund
- 0.2%
- Heartland AdvisorsBill Nasgovitz
- Value
- $21m
- Share of fund
- 0.9%
- Engine CapitalArnaud Ajdler
- Value
- $14m
- Share of fund
- 1.4%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $5m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce
- Value
- $3m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $116m | 0.2% | |
| Heartland AdvisorsBill Nasgovitz | $21m | 0.9% | |
| Voss CapitalTravis Cocke | $20m | 1.0% | Cut |
| Engine CapitalArnaud Ajdler | $14m | 1.4% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $12m | <0.1% | Added |
| Ariel InvestmentsJohn Rogers Jr. | $9m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $5m | <0.1% | |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $3m | <0.1% | |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $568,518 | <0.1% | Cut |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $18,533 | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$477m
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$209m
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$194m
- FMR$188mAdded
- American Century Companies$150mAdded
- State Street$132mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$132m
- LSV Asset Management$116m
- Geode Capital Management$101mAdded
- Invesco$87mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.7%Since 31 March 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investor6.4%+1.0 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 5.3%(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.0%Since 31 March 2026
- Voss CapitalPassive investorat least 2.3%−3.0 pts(filed with 4 related holders)Since 31 March 2026
- Millennium Management LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.7% | 31 March 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | 6.4%+1.0 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 5.3% (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.0% | 31 March 2026 | |
Voss Capital Passive investor | at least 2.3%−3.0 pts (filed with 4 related holders) | 31 March 2026 | |
Millennium Management LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 10 sold $4m.
- Boyle RobertSVP, GC and SecretarySold
- Date
- 15 September 2026
- Shares
- 7,500
- Price
- $62.12
- Value
- $465,881
- Anderson Todd LVP and Chief Tech. OfficerSold
- Date
- 11 September 2026
- Shares
- 3,056
- Price
- $66.41
- Value
- $202,942
- Logar MatthewSVP and CIOSold
- Date
- 10 September 2026
- Shares
- 1,257
- Price
- $66.33
- Value
- $83,372
- Gustanski ChristopherVP, Operational ExcellenceSold
- Date
- 9 September 2026
- Shares
- 2,097
- Price
- $66.97
- Value
- $140,426
- Gropp Chris PSenior Vice President and CFOSold
- Date
- 9 September 2026
- Shares
- 13,500
- Price
- $66.71
- Value
- $900,536
- Ericson Brady DPresident and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 31 August 2026
- Shares
- 27,860
- Price
- $68.39
- Value
- $2m
- Pombier SamanthaVice President and ControllerSold
- Date
- 10 June 2026
- Shares
- 2,227
- Price
- $82.37
- Value
- $183,438
- Coetzee MichaelVP and GM Fuel Syst. AmericasSold
- Date
- 10 June 2026
- Shares
- 1,250
- Price
- $80.61
- Value
- $100,763
- Gustanski ChristopherVP, Operational ExcellenceSold
- Date
- 4 March 2026
- Shares
- 3,812
- Price
- $72.73
- Value
- $277,247
- Fryer NeilVP and GM Global AftermarketSold
- Date
- 4 March 2026
- Shares
- 624
- Price
- $72.75
- Value
- $45,396
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 September 2026 | Boyle Robert SVP, GC and Secretary | Sold | 7,500 | $62.12 | $465,881 |
| 11 September 2026 | Anderson Todd L VP and Chief Tech. Officer | Sold | 3,056 | $66.41 | $202,942 |
| 10 September 2026 | Logar Matthew SVP and CIO | Sold | 1,257 | $66.33 | $83,372 |
| 9 September 2026 | Gustanski Christopher VP, Operational Excellence | Sold | 2,097 | $66.97 | $140,426 |
| 9 September 2026 | Gropp Chris P Senior Vice President and CFO | Sold | 13,500 | $66.71 | $900,536 |
| 31 August 2026 | Ericson Brady D President and CEO, Director | Sold | 27,860 | $68.39 | $2m |
| 10 June 2026 | Pombier Samantha Vice President and Controller | Sold | 2,227 | $82.37 | $183,438 |
| 10 June 2026 | Coetzee Michael VP and GM Fuel Syst. Americas | Sold | 1,250 | $80.61 | $100,763 |
| 4 March 2026 | Gustanski Christopher VP, Operational Excellence | Sold | 3,812 | $72.73 | $277,247 |
| 4 March 2026 | Fryer Neil VP and GM Global Aftermarket | Sold | 624 | $72.75 | $45,396 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the serious warning signs we check for were found. 1 thing worth knowing.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 12 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026 and 4 later 8-Ks.
Changed auditor
Worth knowingThe company changed its auditor (the firm that checks its books) in the last two years.
“On February 12, 2026, the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, PwC completed its procedures on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, and the dismissal of PwC was effective thereon.”
From an 8-K filed 12 February 2026: Change of auditor. Read it in the filing
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Disruptions in our supply chain have in the past, and could in the future, adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In recent years, the global economy and entire industries have experienced global supply chain shortages and other disruptions, including due to natural disasters or extreme weather events, political disruptions, pandemics or other public health crises, terrorist attacks, acts of war, labor or social unrest, government actions (such as relating to trade laws, tariffs and import and export controls), cybersecurity attacks or incidents, manufacturing disasters (such as burn downs), financially distressed suppliers and other circumstances. For the global transportation industry in particular, although global supply chains have recovered from the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, other circumstances (such as the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, trade restrictions, terrorist attacks, natural disasters and extreme weather events) have caused supply constraints for certain components that have impacted, and some of which continue to impact, global industry production levels. These circumstances and other rapidly changing industry conditions (such as volatile production volumes, credit tightness, changes in foreign currencies, raw material, commodity, transportation and energy price escalation, drastic changes in consumer preferences and other factors) have resulted or could in the future result in significant supply disruptions, supplier financial instability, or distress, commercial disputes with suppliers and customers. In addition, new trade regulations, including export controls on rare earth metals and semiconductors, increases in tariffs, other changes in trade policy and relations and elevated levels of steel mill plant closures, could have a material, adverse impact on our business by increasing our input costs or limiting supplies, ultimately requiring more flexibility in our supply locations through near shoring and dual sourcing.
Read moreA failure of or disruption in our technology infrastructure, including a disruption related to cybersecurity, could adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Could happenWe rely on the capacity, reliability, and security of our technology systems and infrastructure, including operational technology and industrial control systems that support our global manufacturing, testing, and quality assurance processes. We also depend on third ‑ party service providers, software suppliers (including providers of enterprise resource planning applications), and manufacturing partners. These systems are vulnerable to disruptions (including those resulting from cybersecurity attacks), failures or vulnerabilities in third-party provided products and services (including relating to certain end-of-life or unsupported systems or hardware), and natural disasters or adverse weather events. Although we employ due diligence, ongoing monitoring, risk assessments, system and hardware modernization initiatives and other protective measures, vulnerabilities or failures (including previously unknown vulnerabilities) of these systems could result in production delays, increased costs, or other adverse impacts that we may not be able to prevent or fully mitigate. In addition, the rapid evolution and increased adoption of AI technologies may intensify our cybersecurity risks, including risks of model manipulation, data leakage, the introduction of insecure code and social engineering using AI-generated content. Disruptions in, attacks on, and the integrity of our technology systems and infrastructure, or on the information systems, products, or services of third parties with which we engage, pose a risk to the security of our systems and data, including the data of our employees, customers, and suppliers. Some cybersecurity attacks or incidents result from human error or manipulation(including phishing, business email compromise, or other schemes or attacks that use social engineering) to gain access to systems, carry out disbursement of funds, or other frauds, or involve ransomware, malware, and other advanced persistent threats that increase the risks and costs associated with protecting against such attacks. Threat actors increasingly deploy phishing attacks and business email compromise schemes aimed at disrupting operations, extorting payments, or redirecting funds. Such attacks could encrypt or corrupt critical systems or data, impede access to design or manufacturing systems, or result in fraudulent disbursements, any of which could materially increase costs and adversely affect our business or results of operations. To date, risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have not materially affected or are not reasonably likely to materially affect the Company or our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Read moreWe or the Former Parent may fail to perform under, or additional disputes may arise between the parties relating to, various transaction agreements that have been executed in connection with the separation.
Could happenAs previously disclosed, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the Former Parent to resolve previously disclosed claims asserted by the Former Parent against the Company in Delaware Superior Court in September 2024, pursuant to which the Former Parent sought, among other things, a judicial declaration that the Company is obligated under the Tax Matters Agreement to remit to the Former Parent refunds obtained by the Company from tax authorities that relate to certain indirect tax payments made prior to the Spin-Off. The Settlement Agreement also resolved the Company’s counterclaims asserted against the Former Parent in Delaware Superior Court in December 2024. In connection with the Settlement Agreement, the Company and the Former Parent also entered into an amendment to the Tax Matters Agreement to provide for, among other things, clarification of the Former Parent’s responsibility for certain pre-Spin-Off tax liabilities and the Company’s ability to obtain and use the benefit of certain pre-Spin-Off credits and other offsets. If any additional disputes were to arise between the parties, such disputes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition results of operations and cash flows. For more information regarding the Settlement Agreement, refer to Note 20, “Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Read moreThe failure to identify, consummate, effectively integrate or realize the expected benefits from acquisitions, partnerships or other strategic investments could adversely affect our growth and our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Could happenThe success of our growth strategy is also dependent, in part, on our ability to identify and realize the expected benefits of other strategic investments and opportunities for growth, such as through diversifying or expanding our current offerings, and successfully launching programs in segments that are newer to our business, such as aerospace and defense. If we are not successful in our efforts to diversify or expand our current offerings, grow our business in newer segments, or identify and realize the expected benefits of other strategic investments, our competitive position and business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.