CPI Card Group
PMTS on Nasdaq. CPI Card Group sells payment cards to banks, credit unions and prepaid program managers. Market value $285m.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing big in our quick check. See what could go wrong below.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $26.89 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 9.7 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 22 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 78 of 100. Price score: 93 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$24.69 a share, 128% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $10.81 to $31.25.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $77 million in the past 12 months, $41 million in the year to December 2025.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $375m | $476m | $445m | $481m | $544m |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 15.9% | 16.6% | 13.9% | 13.1% | 10.1% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn | 0.01bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)4 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)No
- DebtUnknown
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 11.7% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $149 million last quarter, up 15% on a year ago.
- Profit: $2 million, up 294% on a year ago.
- It keeps 9 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 11 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $77 million, up from $34 million.
- 1% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
- Debt is $241 million more than cash, down from $294 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $125m |
| December 2024 | $125m |
| March 2025 | $123m |
| June 2025 | $130m |
| September 2025 | $138m |
| December 2025 | $153m |
| March 2026 | $147m |
| June 2026 | $149m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $1m |
| December 2024 | $7m |
| March 2025 | $5m |
| June 2025 | $518,000 |
| September 2025 | $2m |
| December 2025 | $7m |
| March 2026 | $2m |
| June 2026 | $2m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 5 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 5 November 2026
Who owns it
1 long-term investor we follow owns it, unchanged from 1 last quarter. 78 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $2m | <0.1% | Cut |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$11mAdded
- Pacific Ridge Capital Partners$11mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$5m
- Pembroke Management$5mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$5m
- Geode Capital Management$4mAdded
- UBS Group AG$3m
- State Street$2mAdded
- LSV Asset Management$2mCut
- Northern Trust$2m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
2 investors own more than 5%.
- Parallel49 Equity, ULCPassive investorat least 23.6%(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 December 2025
- Tricor Pacific Capital Inc.at least 23.4%+4.3 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 14 September 2026
What they said
The Reporting Persons have no present plan or proposal which would relate to or result in any of the matters set forth in subparagraphs (a) - (j) of Item 4 of Schedule 13D except as set forth herein. On December 4, 2025, Sub purchased 1,926,056 Shares (the "Restricted Shares")…
Read the filing
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Parallel49 Equity, ULC Passive investor | at least 23.6% (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 December 2025 | |
Tricor Pacific Capital Inc. | at least 23.4%+4.3 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 14 September 2026 | What they saidThe Reporting Persons have no present plan or proposal which would relate to or result in any of the matters set forth in subparagraphs (a) - (j) of Item 4 of Schedule 13D except as set forth herein. On December 4, 2025, Sub purchased 1,926,056 Shares (the "Restricted Shares")… Read the filing |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 4 insiders bought $4m of shares on the open market. 1 sold $74,608.
- Mallela RaviDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 September 2026
- Shares
- 1,000
- Price
- $21.50
- Value
- $21,500
- Peters NicholasDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 September 2026
- Shares
- 11,628
- Price
- $21.50
- Value
- $250,002
- SHEINBAUM MARCDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 September 2026
- Shares
- 4,651
- Price
- $21.50
- Value
- $99,997
- Riley H SanfordDirectorBought
- Date
- 14 September 2026
- Shares
- 13,953
- Price
- $21.50
- Value
- $299,990
- Riley H SanfordDirectorBought
- Date
- 19 May 2026
- Shares
- 11,900
- Price
- $16.00
- Value
- $190,400
- Carmignani Donna AbbeyController & Chief Acct. Off.Sold
- Date
- 11 May 2026
- Shares
- 4,870
- Price
- $15.32
- Value
- $74,608
- Riley H SanfordDirectorBought
- Date
- 4 December 2025
- Shares
- 200,000
- Price
- $13.51
- Value
- $3m
- Riley H SanfordDirectorBought
- Date
- 6 November 2025
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $14.20
- Value
- $142,000
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 September 2026 | Mallela Ravi Director | Bought | 1,000 | $21.50 | $21,500 |
| 14 September 2026 | Peters Nicholas Director | Bought | 11,628 | $21.50 | $250,002 |
| 14 September 2026 | SHEINBAUM MARC Director | Bought | 4,651 | $21.50 | $99,997 |
| 14 September 2026 | Riley H Sanford Director | Bought | 13,953 | $21.50 | $299,990 |
| 19 May 2026 | Riley H Sanford Director | Bought | 11,900 | $16.00 | $190,400 |
| 11 May 2026 | Carmignani Donna Abbey Controller & Chief Acct. Off. | Sold | 4,870 | $15.32 | $74,608 |
| 4 December 2025 | Riley H Sanford Director | Bought | 200,000 | $13.51 | $3m |
| 6 November 2025 | Riley H Sanford Director | Bought | 10,000 | $14.20 | $142,000 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 5 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
- It owes more than it owns on paper (negative equity). Often that's from borrowing to buy back shares.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Risks Relating to our Business and Industry ● Our inability to develop new or enhanced products and related services, including due to…
Risks Relating to our Business and Industry ● Our inability to develop new or enhanced products and related services, including due to our inability to undertake time-consuming and costly research and development activities, or the widespread adoption of technological changes, new products or industry standards, such as digital payment systems or mobile payments, which may render our products obsolete or irrelevant. ● A cyber-attack or breach of our information technology systems resulting in losses of our intellectual property and/or sensitive cardholder data, harm to our competitive position and a loss of customer trust and confidence, and, as threats evolve, the necessity to invest in significant additional resources to enhance our information security and controls. ● The usage, or lack thereof, of artificial intelligence technologies. ● Disruptions, delays or other failures in our supply chain, including due to increased costs and inflationary pressures in our supply chain, single-source suppliers, or the failure or inability of our suppliers to comply with our codes of conduct or contractual requirements , trade restrictions, tariffs, foreign conflicts or political unrest in countries in which our suppliers operate, and our inability to pass related costs on to our customers or difficulty meeting customers’ delivery expectations due to extended lead times . ● Changes in U.S. and global trade policy and the impact of tariffs have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. ● Any interruption of our information technology systems, including disruptions or failures of our third-party data centers, inhibiting our ability to serve our customers. ● Defects in our software and computing systems, resulting in errors or delays in the processing of transactions and other interruptions in our business operations. ● A disruption at any of our production facilities due to weather conditions, climate change, political instability, or social unrest and our inability to recover quickly or otherwise provide continuity of production to meet customer requirements. ● Problems in our production processes, including as a result of mechanical or technological failures, which could lead to reduced production capacity and quality. ● Defects in our products that may give rise to products recalls, product liability and warranty claims as well as damage to our reputation. ● Failure to recruit, retain and develop qualified new and replacement personnel and implement effective succession processes amidst labor shortages and competitive labor markets. ● Our indebtedness and the covenants and restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness limiting our ability to use our cash flow in certain areas of our business, capitalize on certain business opportunities and pursue our business strategies, all of which could be further impacted if we incur additional debt and could impact our ability to make debt service payments. ● Our inability to make debt service payments and an inability to refinance our existing debt on favorable terms or at all. ● Our inability to execute successfully on an acquisition strategy or strategic relationships. ● We may not realize the potential benefits from the acquisition of Arroweye because of difficulties related to integration, the achievement of synergies and other challenges. ● Our inability to divest or consolidate certain non-strategic businesses. ● Our potential failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including maintaining effective control over financial reporting and risks relating to investor confidence in our financial reports. ● The impact of the increasing focus on ESG factors on our ability to produce our products in conformity with stakeholder preferences, and comply with stakeholder demands as well as comply with any new ESG-related legal or regulatory requirements or restrictions, and negative perceptions of our products due to the
Read moreChanges in U.S. and global trade policy and the impact of tariffs have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Already happenedOur business and results of operations has been and may continue to be adversely affected by uncertainty and changes in U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, trade agreements or other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments. For example, beginning in the first quarter of 2025, the U.S. administration has announced, delayed, re-imposed and revised a series of broad-based, as well as country-, bloc- and sector-specific, tariffs on goods imported into the United States, as well as other trade policy changes. Further, in August 2025, the U.S. administration announced plans to impose tariffs on imported semiconductor chips and in January 2026, imposed tariffs on certain imported semiconductors. While such tariffs did not impact semiconductors used in our products, we have been adversely impacted by tariffs on other imported materials and components used in our products, and we may be adversely impacted by tariffs on imported semiconductors or other materials and components in the future. Further, on February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. administration announced its intention to invoke other laws to collect tariffs and announced new tariffs on imports from all countries, in addition to any existing non-IEEPA tariffs. Such actions have given, and may continue to give, rise to further escalations of trade measures by the United States and impacted countries, including the announcement of retaliatory tariffs on certain goods imported from the United States. Further developments with regard to the timing and manner in which tariffs are implemented, the amount, scope and nature of tariffs, the countries subject to new or additional tariffs imposed by the United States, and tariffs imposed by other countries on goods imported from the United States are rapidly evolving and may change unexpectedly at any time, making it difficult for us to predict future developments regarding global tariffs or other trade restrictions or their ultimate effects on our business and results of operations.
Read moreChanges in U.S. and global trade policy and the impact of tariffs have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, tariffs or other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and volatility in U.S. and global financial and economic conditions, declining consumer confidence and inflation, and ultimately reduced demand for our products and related services. Such conditions have and could continue to have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and cash flows. Also, disruptions and volatility in the financial markets may lead to adverse changes in the availability, terms and cost of capital. Such adverse changes have increased and could continue to increase our costs of capital and limit our access to external financing sources to fund acquisitions, capital projects, or refinancing of debt maturities on similar terms, which could in turn reduce our cash flows and limit our ability to pursue growth opportunities. There is no guarantee that we can avoid the impact of tariff and related economic effects in the future, and these trade measures and retaliations may directly impair our business by reducing demand for our products and related services, increasing trade-related costs or disrupting established supply chains.
Read moreWe may not realize the potential benefits from the acquisition of Arroweye because of difficulties related to integration, the achievement of synergies and other challenges.
In addition, at times the attention of certain members of our management and resources may be focused on integration of the businesses of the two companies and diverted from day-to-day business operations, which may disrupt our ongoing business and the business of the combined company. We have incurred, and may continue to incur, significant, non-recurring costs in connection with the acquisition and integrating the operations of CPI and Arroweye. Management cannot ensure that the elimination of duplicative costs or the realization of other efficiencies will offset the transaction and integration costs in the near term or at all.
Read moreWe may not realize the potential benefits from the acquisition of Arroweye because of difficulties related to integration, the achievement of synergies and other challenges.
Could happenWe completed the acquisition of Arroweye on May 6, 2025. Prior to the completion of the acquisition, we and Arroweye operated independently, and there can be no assurances that our businesses can be combined in a manner that allows for the full achievement of substantial benefits. If we are not able to successfully complete the integration of Arroweye’s business with ours, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or may take longer than expected to be realized. Specifically, the following issues, among others, must be addressed in combining Arroweye’s operations with ours in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition:
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.