Regal Rexnord
RRX on NYSE. Regal Rexnord sells motors, power transmission parts, and automation controls to industrial customers. Market value $10.7bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Good business, but not cheap right now
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
See cheaper Industrials stocks on the list
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $4.21 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 21.7 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 4 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 79 of 100. Price score: 54 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$166.36 a share, 30% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $127.96 to $247.80.
Dividend: 0.8% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
Spare cash swings from quarter to quarter here: $466 million in the past 12 months, $893 million in the year to December 2025.
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $3.8bn | $5.2bn | $6.3bn | $6.0bn | $5.9bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 9.4% | 13.2% | 6.0% | 10.4% | 11.5% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.31 | 0.33 | 1.02 | 0.88 | 0.71 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.07bn | 0.07bn | 0.07bn | 0.07bn | 0.07bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.71× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 15.4% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.6 billion last quarter, up 4% on a year ago.
- Profit: $117 million, up 47% on a year ago.
- It keeps 12 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 11 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $466 million, down from $888 million.
- 1% more shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit less of the company.
- Debt is $4.3 billion more than cash, down from $4.6 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $1.5bn |
| December 2024 | $1.5bn |
| March 2025 | $1.4bn |
| June 2025 | $1.5bn |
| September 2025 | $1.5bn |
| December 2025 | $1.5bn |
| March 2026 | $1.5bn |
| June 2026 | $1.6bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $73m |
| December 2024 | $41m |
| March 2025 | $57m |
| June 2025 | $79m |
| September 2025 | $80m |
| December 2025 | $64m |
| March 2026 | $64m |
| June 2026 | $117m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 20 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 4 November 2026
Who owns it
8 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 8 last quarter. 608 funds in all.
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $724,812
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viking Global InvestorsAndreas Halvorsen | $501m | 1.4% | Cut |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $255m | 0.8% | Added |
| Diamond Hill Capital ManagementRic Dillon (founder) | $95m | 0.8% | Cut |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $77m | <0.1% | Added |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $52m | 0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $5m | <0.1% | Added |
| First Eagle Investment ManagementMatthew McLennan | $2m | <0.1% | Added |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $724,812 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$1.5bnAdded
- FMR$1.1bnCut
- Victory Capital Management$1.1bnAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$717m
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$675m
- Wellington Management Group LLP$615mAdded
- Viking Global Investors$501mCut
- State Street$499mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$481mCut
- Bank of New York Mellon$449mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
4 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor8.7%−1.0 ptsSince 31 March 2025
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 7.1%+1.1 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 March 2026
- Viking Global InvestorsPassive investorat least 5.4%+0.4 pts(filed with 11 related holders)Since 9 September 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.2%Since 31 March 2026
- Ott David C.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 6 January 2026
- Capital World InvestorsPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 December 2025
- Victory Capital Management, Inc.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 8.7%−1.0 pts | 31 March 2025 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 7.1%+1.1 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 March 2026 | |
Viking Global Investors Passive investor | at least 5.4%+0.4 pts (filed with 11 related holders) | 9 September 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
Ott David C. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 6 January 2026 | |
Capital World Investors Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 December 2025 | |
Victory Capital Management, Inc. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 7 sold $28m, $2m of it under preset trading plans.
- Scarpelli Alexander PSVP, Corp. Controller and CAO*Sold
- Date
- 10 August 2026
- Shares
- 170
- Price
- $176.24
- Value
- $29,960
- Rehard RobertEVP and CFO*Sold
- Date
- 22 May 2026
- Shares
- 6,499
- Price
- $200.00
- Value
- $1m
- Morton Jerrald REVP and Pres. IPS*Sold
- Date
- 14 May 2026
- Shares
- 9,390
- Price
- $209.13
- Value
- $2m
- Pinkham Louis V.Chief Executive Officer, DirectorSold
- Date
- 11 May 2026
- Shares
- 22,509
- Price
- $211.68
- Value
- $5m
- Walker-Lee Robin ADirectorSold
- Date
- 11 May 2026
- Shares
- 1,297
- Price
- $213.85
- Value
- $277,363
- Rehard RobertEVP and CFO*Sold
- Date
- 25 February 2026
- Shares
- 968
- Price
- $223.00
- Value
- $215,864
- Scarpelli Alexander PSVP, Corp. Controller and CAO*Sold
- Date
- 25 February 2026
- Shares
- 290
- Price
- $223.75
- Value
- $64,888
- Rehard RobertEVP and CFO*Sold
- Date
- 24 February 2026
- Shares
- 1,289
- Price
- $223.13
- Value
- $287,615
- Rehard RobertEVP and CFO*Sold
- Date
- 9 February 2026
- Shares
- 7,704
- Price
- $216.72
- Value
- $2m
- Lewis CherylEVP and Chief HR Officer*Sold
- Date
- 9 February 2026
- Shares
- 2,262
- Price
- $215.73
- Value
- $487,981
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 August 2026 | Scarpelli Alexander P SVP, Corp. Controller and CAO* | Sold | 170 | $176.24 | $29,960 |
| 22 May 2026 | Rehard Robert EVP and CFO* | Sold | 6,499 | $200.00 | $1m |
| 14 May 2026 | Morton Jerrald R EVP and Pres. IPS* | Sold | 9,390 | $209.13 | $2m |
| 11 May 2026 | Pinkham Louis V. Chief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 22,509 | $211.68 | $5m |
| 11 May 2026 | Walker-Lee Robin A Director | Sold | 1,297 | $213.85 | $277,363 |
| 25 February 2026 | Rehard Robert EVP and CFO* | Sold | 968 | $223.00 | $215,864 |
| 25 February 2026 | Scarpelli Alexander P SVP, Corp. Controller and CAO* | Sold | 290 | $223.75 | $64,888 |
| 24 February 2026 | Rehard Robert EVP and CFO* | Sold | 1,289 | $223.13 | $287,615 |
| 9 February 2026 | Rehard Robert EVP and CFO* | Sold | 7,704 | $216.72 | $2m |
| 9 February 2026 | Lewis Cheryl EVP and Chief HR Officer* | Sold | 2,262 | $215.73 | $487,981 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 20 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 5 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our competitive position and financial condition may suffer if we fail to keep pace with rapidly evolving technological developments related to advances in AI, machine-learning and generative AI technologies.
Could happenThe potential introduction of evolving technologies into new and existing offerings may result in new or expanded risks and liabilities, including enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, compliance issues, ethical concerns, confidentiality, or security risks, as well as other factors that could adversely affect our business, reputation, and results or operations and financial condition. In addition, our vendors may incorporate AI tools into their offerings, and, despite our vendor due diligence, these tools may not meet existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards and may inhibit our or our vendors’ ability to maintain an adequate level of service and experience. The use of AI can lead to unintended consequences, including generating factually inaccurate content, misleading or otherwise flawed information, or unintended biases and skewed outcomes, which could expose us to risks related to inaccuracies or errors in the output of such technologies. We also face risks of competitive disadvantage if our competitors more effectively use AI to create new or enhanced products or services that we are unable to compete against. Malicious actors may also use generative AI to strengthen social engineering capabilities or create more targeted phishing narratives or otherwise, which may increase the threat of a cybersecurity incident. If we, or our vendors, experience an actual or perceived breach or security incident because of the use of generative AI, we may lose valuable intellectual property and confidential information and our reputation and the public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed. In addition, many US and international governmental bodies and regulators have proposed, or are in the process of developing, new regulations related to the use of AI and machine-learning technologies. The final form of these regulations may impose obligations related to our development, offering, and use of AI technologies and expose us to increased risk of regulatory enforcement and litigation.
Read moreChanges to and uncertainty in US trade policy, tariff and import/export regulations and foreign government regulations or other trade restrictions imposed by the US or other governments have adversely affected our business and could materially affect our business, foreign operations, sourcing, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes to tariffs and uncertainty in US and international trade policy have adversely impacted and will continue to adversely impact our business and the US and global economy or certain sectors thereof, including our industry, and could have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. For example, the US has instituted changes in trade policies that include the imposition of higher tariffs on imports into the US, restrictions on imports of certain products in the US, the renegotiation or termination of trade agreements, and may impact other regulations affecting trade between the US and countries where we conduct our business. In particular, the US government imposed tariffs on imports from China, Canada, Mexico, India and other countries, and such countries have taken, or have threatened to take, retaliatory actions, including imposing retaliatory tariffs. To date, we have successfully navigated the changing trade policy environment and mitigated these tariffs, so as to avoid a material impact on our business and financial condition. However, the current volatility in global trade policy could ultimately affect our business and, while we have plans in place intended to mitigate the impacts of these tariffs on our business, there is no guarantee that such plans will fully mitigate the effects of such tariffs. In particular, the US imposition of reciprocal and penalty tariffs on imports from India in August 2025 has impacted the cost of materials and goods originating from India and we believe without a reduction in the US effective tariff rate on India, our business may be impacted.
Read moreChanges to and uncertainty in US trade policy, tariff and import/export regulations and foreign government regulations or other trade restrictions imposed by the US or other governments have adversely affected our business and could materially affect our business, foreign operations, sourcing, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenAdditionally, to date, our internal estimates reflect that the vast majority of goods the Company imports from Canada and Mexico are compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (the “USMCA”) and are therefore exempt from tariffs. While the current tariff regime contemplates that this exemption for USMCA-compliant imports will remain in effect, if this exemption is altered or removed, as a result of the expected USMCA re-negotiation or otherwise, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results to the extent we are unable to mitigate any resulting impacts. We cannot predict what additional changes to trade policy will be made that may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition or could provide our competitors with an advantage over us.
Read moreWe operate in highly competitive global industries and markets and continue to expand and develop our markets.
Could happenAdditionally, as we enter into or expand or develop our offerings in new markers, we face additional and emerging risks that may be specific to those new markets. For instance, as we grow our data center business, we must manage new risks such as new and uncertain fluctuation in demand cycles, pricing pressures, expectations around execution, quality and performance, and supply chain and manufacturing disruptions, which may have an outsized impact on this business, and rapid technology changes that require continuous and ongoing investment to remain competitive. As we grow in this market and other markets, we must continue to manage these known risks and additional risks as they emerge in order to remain competitive and grow our market share. Moreover, entry or expansion into new markets requires significant investment and resources that otherwise could have been invested elsewhere in the Company. If we are not successful in realizing the benefits of those investments, it could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Read moreWe may be subject to demand uncertainty and order volatility.
Could happenA significant portion of our revenue is generated from customers that place orders through purchase orders (“POs”) rather than pursuant to long-term contracts. Even where we have entered into long-term or framework agreements with customers, such agreements establish commercial terms governing the relationship, but do not generally require customers to purchase a minimum volume of products. In these cases, customers continue to issue POs on an as-needed basis and retain discretion over the timing and size of the orders.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.