Signet Jewelers
SIG on NYSE. Signet sells jewelry to people marking milestones and expressing love. Market value $3.9bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to July 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to January 2026.
We can't read total debt from the filing, so debt is left out.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $13.71 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
The filings do not give us enough to work this out.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 69 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 80 of 100. Price score: 83 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$102.10 a share, 43% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $71.62 to $110.20.
Dividend: 1.3% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $7.8bn | $7.8bn | $7.2bn | $6.7bn | $6.8bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 7.7% | 8.7% | 1.7% | 5.8% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00 | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.05bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn | 0.04bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)7 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- DebtUnknown
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 5.4% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 16% fewer since 2022
The quarter to July 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $1.5 billion last quarter, about the same as a year ago.
- Profit: $52 million, after a loss of $9 million a year ago.
- It keeps 7 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 3 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $537 million, up from $454 million.
- 4% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 2 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $1.3bn |
| January 2025 | $2.4bn |
| April 2025 | $1.5bn |
| July 2025 | $1.5bn |
| October 2025 | $1.4bn |
| January 2026 | $2.3bn |
| April 2026 | $1.6bn |
| July 2026 | $1.5bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | $7m |
| January 2025 | $101m |
| April 2025 | $34m |
| July 2025 | -$9m |
| October 2025 | $20m |
| January 2026 | $250m |
| April 2026 | $32m |
| July 2026 | $52m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 19 March 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 9 December 2026
Who owns it
6 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 6 last quarter. 333 funds in all.
- GMOJeremy Grantham
- Value
- $3m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team
- Value
- $6,293
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Select Equity GroupGeorge Loening | $210m | 1.1% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $121m | 0.2% | Added |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $18m | 0.1% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $3m | <0.1% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $3m | <0.1% | Cut |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $6,293 | <0.1% |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$570mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$306mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$223mAdded
- Select Equity Group$210mCut
- FMR$187mCut
- American Century Companies$157mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$155mAdded
- State Street$149mAdded
- LSV Asset Management$121mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$91mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
7 investors own more than 5%; 1 of them is pushing for change.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor14.4%Since 30 September 2025
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor10.2%+1.1 ptsSince 31 August 2026
- George S. LoeningActivistWants the company sold8.7%−1.0 ptsSince 2 January 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investor6.6%Since 30 June 2026
- Select Equity GroupPassive investorat least 6.2%−1.9 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 5.5%−6.1 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.1%Since 31 March 2026
- COOPER CREEK PARTNERS MANAGEMENT LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2025
- SEG Partners II, L.P.Passive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 January 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 14.4% | 30 September 2025 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 10.2%+1.1 pts | 31 August 2026 | |
George S. Loening Activist Wants the company sold | 8.7%−1.0 pts | 2 January 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | 6.6% | 30 June 2026 | |
Select Equity Group Passive investor | at least 6.2%−1.9 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 5.5%−6.1 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.1% | 31 March 2026 | |
COOPER CREEK PARTNERS MANAGEMENT LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2025 | |
SEG Partners II, L.P. Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 January 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 1 sold $622,720.
- Tilzer Brian ADirectorSold
- Date
- 25 March 2026
- Shares
- 7,000
- Price
- $88.96
- Value
- $622,720
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 March 2026 | Tilzer Brian A Director | Sold | 7,000 | $88.96 | $622,720 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 19 Mar 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 9 Sep 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our use of AI, machine learning (“ML”), and generative AI (“Gen AI”) technologies, including customer-facing applications, may expose us to confidentiality, cybersecurity, operational, legal, regulatory and reputational risks and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenThe use of AI and Gen AI also raises legal and regulatory risks, including risks related to intellectual property, data protection, consumer protection, employment, and emerging AI‑specific regulation in the US and internationally. Claims may arise alleging that AI‑generated outputs infringe third‑party intellectual property rights or that training data or model behavior violates applicable law. Regulatory requirements governing AI are evolving rapidly, and compliance with current or future laws, regulations, or enforcement priorities may require significant changes to our business practices, increased costs, or limitations on how we deploy AI technologies. Our vendor and service provider use of AI may also impact our ability to comply with various consumer privacy regulations related to consumer data these providers process on our behalf.
Read moreAny difficulty, delay or failure in executing acquisitions, strategic initiatives or transformation plans could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenAs part of our ongoing brand and digital transformation efforts, we are continuously evaluating and implementing changes to our brand portfolio and digital platforms, including aligning brands, evolving digital brand strategies, and, in certain cases, consolidating or sunsetting standalone digital experiences. For example, we are planning to transition James Allen as a collection within the Blue Nile website and decommission the standalone James Allen website. These actions involve risks, including customer disruption, loss of brand equity or traffic, technology and execution challenges, adverse customer or market reaction, cannibalization of other brands within our portfolio and failure to achieve the intended strategic or financial benefits.
Read moreOur use of AI, machine learning (“ML”), and generative AI (“Gen AI”) technologies, including customer-facing applications, may expose us to confidentiality, cybersecurity, operational, legal, regulatory and reputational risks and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenTable of Content s We have implemented and continue to enhance policies, governance structures, security controls, guardrails, and oversight processes designed to promote responsible AI use, including human review and approval processes, employee training, and monitoring of AI‑enabled systems. However, these measures may not be effective in preventing all risks or incidents associated with AI or Gen AI technologies, particularly as these technologies continue to develop and be adopted across our operations and customer‑facing platforms.
Read moreSignet’s success is dependent on the strength and effectiveness of its relationships with its various stakeholders. The Company’s management of its 2030 CSGs as well as changing demand for sustainability initiatives and disclosures could result in additional costs or risks.
Could happenSignet carefully considers a wide range of factors, including stakeholder expectations, regulatory requirements, business goals, and corporate strategies in forming our CSGs and when investing resources in initiatives, disclosures, processes and tools. Standards for tracking and reporting CSG performance continue to evolve. Signet has revised and may continue to reassess and modify CSG goals based on changes to our Company purpose, business objectives, stakeholder expectations and the regulatory environment. Signet may be subject to consumer boycotts from customers on both sides of the ideological spectrum. Any changes to the CSGs may be perceived as a retraction or deviation from our core values. The voluntary disclosure frameworks and standards we select, and the Table of Content s interpretation or application of those frameworks and standards, may be subject to change and may be different from our peers. Further, the methodologies we use for reporting CSG performance may be updated and our previously reported data may be adjusted to reflect improvements in data that is available to us, changing assumptions, changes in our operations and other changes in circumstances. Our processes and controls for reporting such matters across our operations and supply chain are continually evolving as are the differing standards for identifying, measuring, and reporting sustainability-related disclosures that may be required by government agencies. In addition, the State of California recently adopted certain climate disclosure requirements for climate risks and greenhouse gas emissions, and compliance with these rules is expected to require additional resources. Other states may also soon require similar climate disclosure rules. The evolving regulatory landscape related to climate disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions reporting could increase compliance costs and may expose the Company to litigation or regulatory or enforcement risks. Emerging federal and state-level regulations will likely require disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, as well as third-party assurance over reported data. As climate regulation continues to develop and respond to stakeholder input and legal challenges, Signet may incur additional costs to enhance internal controls, reporting systems, and governance processes to comply with applicable laws and disclosure standards or face potential litigation or enforcement exposure due to regulatory uncertainty. These regulatory measures may also increase climate-related reporting transparency across the jewelry industry allowing external stakeholders to better evaluate relative emissions performance and long-term risks of Signet compared to industry peers. Signet will always prioritize legally required disclosures such as greenhouse gas emissions calculations over voluntary frameworks.
Read moreOur use of AI, machine learning (“ML”), and generative AI (“Gen AI”) technologies, including customer-facing applications, may expose us to confidentiality, cybersecurity, operational, legal, regulatory and reputational risks and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenOur AI and Gen AI initiatives may depend on internal data, third‑party data, and third‑party tools, platforms, infrastructure, or model providers. These dependencies may increase risks related to data privacy and cybersecurity, including the unauthorized disclosure or misuse of sensitive, proprietary, or confidential information, prompt‑based data leakage, system vulnerabilities, impact system availability or data integrity, or other security incidents. If third‑party providers experience outages, degrade performance, change pricing or contractual terms, restrict access, discontinue services, or fail to meet applicable legal, security, or compliance requirements, our ability to operate our business, innovate, or deploy AI‑enabled capabilities could be adversely affected.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.