S&P Global
SPGI on NYSE. Consumer credit reporting, collection agencies. Market value $115.2bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $4.84 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 17.6 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 10 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 93 of 100. Price score: 73 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$390.92 a share, 8% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $361.03 to $522.47.
Dividend: 1.0% a year
Paid in its latest year
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $7.4bn | $8.3bn | $11.2bn | $12.5bn | $15.3bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 48.6% | 50.9% | 44.2% | 32.2% | 42.2% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 8.07 | 2.02 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.42 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.24bn | 0.33bn | 0.32bn | 0.31bn | 0.30bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)Not enough data
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Not enough data
- Debt0.42× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 14.8% a year
- Buying back its own sharesNo, 23% more shares since 2020
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $4.1 billion last quarter, up 10% on a year ago.
- Profit: $1.2 billion, up 14% on a year ago.
- 3% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $11 billion more than cash, up from $9.5 billion a year ago.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| June 2024 | $3.5bn |
| September 2024 | $3.6bn |
| March 2025 | $3.8bn |
| June 2025 | $3.8bn |
| September 2025 | $3.9bn |
| December 2025 | $3.9bn |
| March 2026 | $4.2bn |
| June 2026 | $4.1bn |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| June 2024 | $1.0bn |
| September 2024 | $971m |
| March 2025 | $1.1bn |
| June 2025 | $1.1bn |
| September 2025 | $1.2bn |
| December 2025 | $1.1bn |
| March 2026 | $1.4bn |
| June 2026 | $1.2bn |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 27 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 11 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 27 October 2026
Who owns it
35 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 29 last quarter. 2,016 funds in all.
- TCI Fund ManagementChris Hohn
- Value
- $5.7bn
- Share of fund
- 10.9%
- First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners
- Value
- $421m
- Share of fund
- 1.1%
- Markel GroupTom Gayner
- Value
- $48m
- Share of fund
- 0.4%
- Lindsell TrainNick Train
- Value
- $3m
- Share of fund
- 0.1%
- Weitz Investment ManagementWally Weitz
- Value
- $3m
- Share of fund
- 0.2%
- Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (Sequoia Fund)John Harris
- Value
- $216,255
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$9.8bn
- Vanguard Capital Management$7.9bn
- State Street$5.9bnAdded
- TCI Fund Management$5.7bn
- Morgan Stanley$3.0bnCut
- Geode Capital Management$2.8bn
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$2.6bnCut
- Wellington Management Group LLP$2.2bnCut
- Eagle Capital Management$1.7bnAdded
- Norges Bank$1.6bnNew
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
1 investor owns more than 5%.
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.4%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.4% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 5 insiders bought $4m of shares on the open market.
- Clay Catherine RCEO, S&P Dow Jones IndicesBought
- Date
- 1 May 2026
- Shares
- 2,500
- Price
- $431.39
- Value
- $1m
- Moritz Robert Edward Jr.DirectorBought
- Date
- 30 April 2026
- Shares
- 1,152
- Price
- $434.03
- Value
- $500,003
- CHEUNG MARTINACEO & President, DirectorBought
- Date
- 29 April 2026
- Shares
- 2,322
- Price
- $429.93
- Value
- $998,297
- Joly HubertDirectorBought
- Date
- 11 February 2026
- Shares
- 2,500
- Price
- $398.98
- Value
- $997,459
- Eager William WPresident, S&P Global MobilityBought
- Date
- 10 December 2025
- Shares
- 12
- Price
- $493.40
- Value
- $5,965
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 May 2026 | Clay Catherine R CEO, S&P Dow Jones Indices | Bought | 2,500 | $431.39 | $1m |
| 30 April 2026 | Moritz Robert Edward Jr. Director | Bought | 1,152 | $434.03 | $500,003 |
| 29 April 2026 | CHEUNG MARTINA CEO & President, Director | Bought | 2,322 | $429.93 | $998,297 |
| 11 February 2026 | Joly Hubert Director | Bought | 2,500 | $398.98 | $997,459 |
| 10 December 2025 | Eager William W President, S&P Global Mobility | Bought | 12 | $493.40 | $5,965 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 11 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 28 Jul 2026 and 11 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The planned separation of our Mobility business into an independent, publicly traded company is contingent upon the satisfaction of a number of conditions, may not be completed on the currently contemplated timeline, or at all, and may not achieve the intended benefits.
Could happenOn April 29, 2025, we announced our intent to pursue a separation of our Mobility business through a spin-off to our shareholders. The proposed separation is subject to various conditions, is complex in nature, and may be affected by unanticipated developments. The separation is intended to qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. There can be no assurance regarding the ultimate timing of the separation or that such separation will be completed. Unanticipated developments could delay, prevent or otherwise adversely affect the separation, including but not limited to disruptions in general or financial market conditions or potential problems or delays in satisfying required conditions. Such developments could cause the separation to occur on terms or conditions that are less favorable than anticipated. In addition, we may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits that we anticipate to result from the separation, or such benefits may be delayed or not occur at all. The anticipated benefits of the separation are based on a number of assumptions, some of which may prove incorrect. We also expect to incur significant expenses in connection with the separation, certain of which will be incurred even if the separation is not completed. Executing the separation will continue to require significant resources, time and attention from our senior management and employees, which could divert attention and resources away from other projects and the day-to-day operation of our business. We may experience negative reactions from financial markets if we do not complete the separation in a reasonable time period. Following the proposed separation, the combined value of the shares of the two publicly-traded companies may not be equal to or greater than what the value of our shares would have been had the separation not occurred. The above factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or the price of our shares.
Read moreOur inability to adequately obtain, protect and maintain our intellectual property and other proprietary rights could impact our competitive position.
Could happen• We have filed for patents in the U.S. and in certain international jurisdictions, but such protections can be expensive and may not be available in all countries in which we operate or in which we seek to enforce such rights, or may be difficult to enforce in practice. We have filed for trademark registrations and participated in trademark enforcement and trademark oppositions in the U.S. and certain international jurisdictions to protect our brand, good will and reputation. These efforts cannot ensure registrations will be issued, our trademark rights will be enforced, or violations of our trademark rights will be appropriately resolved. We do business in a number of countries included on the Priority Watch List and/or Watch Lists maintained by the Office of the United States Trade Representative which are currently thought to afford less protection to intellectual property rights generally than some other jurisdictions. The lack of strong patent and other intellectual property protection in jurisdictions in which we operate increases our vulnerability regarding unauthorized disclosure or use of our intellectual property and undermines our competitive position. In addition, even in jurisdictions where there are strong protections for intellectual property rights, our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights may be impacted by the number of competitors or other third parties attempting to infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property, and the time and resources required to defend against such unauthorized uses.
Read moreChanges and increased enforcement in the global privacy, data localization, operational resilience, and data protection legislative, regulatory, and commercial environments in which we operate may materially and adversely impact our ability to collect, compile, use, and publish data, require us to disclose information about our security environment, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Could happen• These laws and regulations are wide-ranging in scope and impose numerous requirements on entities that process certain data, including personal data, such as requirements relating to processing sensitive data, obtaining consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates in certain circumstances, providing information to individuals regarding data processing activities, implementing safeguards to protect the security and confidentiality of personal data, providing notification of data breaches and taking certain measures when engaging third-party processes that will have access to personal data. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number, sometimes change, and can conflict among the various jurisdictions in which we operate. It is possible that we could be prohibited or constrained from collecting or disseminating certain types of data or from providing certain products or services as a result of such laws and regulations. For example, we may not be able, or we may fail, to obtain appropriate third-party consent where consent is required to collect or use certain types of data for certain purposes in our business. Moreover, if our business fails to comply with these laws or regulations, we could be subject to significant litigation and civil or criminal penalties (including monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions or fines) in one or more jurisdictions, as well as reputational damage that could result in the loss of data, brand equity and business. For example, a failure to comply with the GDPR or U.K. GDPR could result in fines up to the greater of €20 million (or £17.5 million under the U.K. GDPR) or 4% of annual global revenues. Additionally, in the case of a DPPA violation, U.S. courts may award liquidated damages of $2,500 per individual’s personal information. Furthermore, any inquiries or investigations, or any other governmental actions, regarding our data processing practices could require significant management time and attention, and may result in negative publicity and subject us to increased costs, as well as demands or orders that we modify our existing business practices. Enforcement of these laws and regulations may increase as enforcement programs mature and better tooling enhances identification of compliance issues.
Read moreOur inability to adequately obtain, protect and maintain our intellectual property and other proprietary rights could impact our competitive position.
Could happen• There can be no assurance that any future patent, trademark, or other intellectual property registrations will be issued for our pending or future applications or that any of our current or future patents, trademarks or other intellectual property rights will be valid, enforceable, sufficiently broad in scope, provide adequate protection of our technology or other proprietary rights, or provide us with any competitive advantage. Any additional investment in protecting our intellectual property rights through additional trademark, patent or other intellectual property filings could be time consuming and expensive, both in terms of application and maintenance costs. We make business decisions about whether and where to seek patent, copyright, and trademark protection for a particular technology and when to rely upon trade secret protection, and the approach we select may ultimately prove to be inadequate. Businesses we acquire may also have intellectual property portfolios which increase the complexity of managing our intellectual property portfolio and protecting our competitive position. Failure to obtain, protect and maintain our intellectual property adequately could harm the value of, and revenue generated by, such assets as well as harm our reputation and affect our ability to compete effectively.
Read moreOur size, scale and role in the global markets increases our exposure to cyber attacks and other cyber-security risks. Our information systems and networks and those of our third-party service providers are exposed to risks related to cybersecurity and protection of confidential information, including material non-public information, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Could happen• The cyber threats we and our third-party service providers (including our vendors, data partners and distribution partners) face are rapidly evolving and are becoming increasingly sophisticated and include denial of service attacks, ransomware, spyware, misinformation, phishing/smishing/vishing attacks, business compromise attacks, typosquatting, automated attacks, employee errors, negligence or malfeasance, the use of malicious codes or worms, payment fraud, and other unauthorized occurrences on, or conducted through, our or our third-party service providers’ (including our vendors’, data partners’ and distribution partners’) information systems and networks, originating from a wide variety of sources, including criminals, terrorists, state-sponsored actors, financially motivated actors, internal actors, and external service providers. The cyber risks the Company faces range from cyber attacks common to most industries, to more sophisticated and targeted attacks, including attacks carried out by state-sponsored actors, intended to obtain unauthorized access to certain information or information systems or networks due in part to our prominence in the global marketplace, such as our ratings on debt issued by sovereigns and corporate issuers, our impending methodology changes in our benchmarks businesses, or the composition of our indices. Our third-party service providers, including our vendors, data partners and distribution partners, are also the subject of a variety of cyber attacks, including attacks carried out by state-sponsored actors.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.