UDR
UDR on NYSE. UDR owns and rents apartments to people in United States cities. Market value $10.9bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $5.16 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 23.9 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 2 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 75 of 100. Price score: 66 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$33.91 a share, 3% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $32.94 to $42.00.
Dividend: 5.2% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $1.3bn | $1.5bn | $1.6bn | $1.7bn | $1.7bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 20.8% | 16.5% | 39.0% | 17.0% | 32.3% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.57 | 1.34 | 1.45 | 1.69 | 1.77 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.33bn | 0.33bn | 0.33bn | 0.33bn | 0.32bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)7 of 7 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt1.77× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 6.6% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $425 million last quarter, about the same as a year ago.
- Profit: $69 million, up 83% on a year ago.
- It keeps 41 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 20 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $562 million, down from $602 million.
- 3% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $5.8 billion more than cash, about the same as a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 3 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $420m |
| December 2024 | $423m |
| March 2025 | $422m |
| June 2025 | $425m |
| September 2025 | $432m |
| December 2025 | $433m |
| March 2026 | $426m |
| June 2026 | $425m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $23m |
| December 2024 | -$5m |
| March 2025 | $77m |
| June 2025 | $38m |
| September 2025 | $40m |
| December 2025 | $223m |
| March 2026 | $190m |
| June 2026 | $69m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- 28 October 2026
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 17 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 27 October 2026
Who owns it
1 long-term investor we follow owns it, unchanged from 1 last quarter. 521 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $26m | <0.1% | Added |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$1.2bnCut
- Norges Bank$1.2bnNew
- Capital Research Global Investors$1.0bn
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$1.0bnCut
- Vanguard Capital Management$810m
- State Street$774mCut
- Cohen & Steers$616mCut
- FMR$562mAdded
- Invesco$553m
- Centersquare Investment Management$368mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
5 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor9.5%Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor8.0%Since 31 March 2026
- Capital Research Global InvestorsPassive investor7.8%Since 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor7.1%Since 31 March 2026
- Cohen & Steers, Inc.Passive investorat least 4.8%0.0 pts(filed with 4 related holders)Since 30 June 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 9.5% | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 8.0% | 31 March 2026 | |
Capital Research Global Investors Passive investor | 7.8% | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 7.1% | 31 March 2026 | |
Cohen & Steers, Inc. Passive investor | at least 4.8%0.0 pts (filed with 4 related holders) | 30 June 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 1 sold $3m.
- TOOMEY THOMAS WChairman, President and CEO, DirectorSold
- Date
- 5 June 2026
- Shares
- 80,000
- Price
- $39.25
- Value
- $3m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 June 2026 | TOOMEY THOMAS W Chairman, President and CEO, Director | Sold | 80,000 | $39.25 | $3m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Actual or Threatened Terrorist Attacks and Other Acts of Violence, Destruction or War May Have an Adverse Effect on Our Business and Operating Results and Could Decrease the Value of Our Assets. Actual or threatened
date have been material to us, we expect such breaches may occur in the future. As the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to information technology systems become more varied and sophisticated and the occurrence of such breaches becomes more frequent, we and our third party vendors and other third parties may be unable to adequately anticipate these techniques or breaches or implement appropriate preventative measures. Any failure to prevent cybersecurity breaches and maintain the proper function, security and availability of our or our third party vendors’ and other third parties’ information technology systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation and brand, damage our competitive position, make it difficult for us to attract and retain residents or other tenants, and subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreActual or Threatened Terrorist Attacks and Other Acts of Violence, Destruction or War May Have an Adverse Effect on Our Business and Operating Results and Could Decrease the Value of Our Assets. Actual or threatened
Could happenterrorist attacks and other acts of violence, destruction or war could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results. Attacks or other similar actions that directly impact one or more of our apartment communities could significantly affect our ability to operate those communities and thereby impair our ability to achieve our expected results. Further, our insurance coverage may not cover all losses caused by a terrorist attack or similar events. In addition, the adverse effects that such violent acts and threats of future attacks could have on the U.S. economy could similarly have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreMaryland Law May Limit the Ability of a Third Party to Acquire Control of Us, Which May Not be in Our Stockholders ’ Best Interests. Maryland business statutes may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of us. As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to various Maryland laws which may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire our Company and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if our acquisition would be in our stockholders’ best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business combination transactions between us and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of our stock
Could happenrepresenting 10% or more of the voting power without our board of directors’ prior approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast, excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides generally that a person who acquires shares of our equity stock that represents 10% (and certain higher levels) of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote.
Read moreOur Success Depends on Our Senior Management. Our success depends upon the retention of our senior management, whose continued service is not guaranteed. We may not be able to find qualified replacements for the individuals who make up our senior management if their services should no longer be available to us. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Could happenIn addition, the criteria by which companies’ corporate responsibility practices are assessed and the regulations applicable thereto are evolving, which could result in greater expectations of us and cause us to undertake costly initiatives or activities to satisfy such new criteria or regulations. Further, if we elect not to or are unable to satisfy such new criteria or do not meet the criteria of a specific third-party provider or investor, some investors may conclude that our policies with respect to corporate responsibility are inadequate. We may face reputational damage in the event that our corporate responsibility procedures or standards do not meet the standards set by various constituencies. Furthermore, if our competitors’ corporate responsibility performance is perceived to be greater than ours, potential or current investors may elect to invest in our competitors instead. In addition, we have communicated certain initiatives and goals regarding environmental, social and governance matters, and we may in the future communicate revised or additional initiatives or goals. We could fail, or be perceived to fail, in our achievement of such initiatives or goals, or we could be criticized for the scope of such initiatives or goals. In addition, certain locations have enacted, and others may in the future enact, sustainability regulations pertaining to buildings, including existing buildings. If we fail to satisfy the expectations of investors, tenants and other stakeholders, our initiatives are not executed as planned, we are unable to comply with regulations or we do not satisfy our goals, our reputation and financial results could be adversely affected.
Read moreCompliance with or Changes in Real Estate Tax and Other Laws and Regulations Could Adversely Affect Our Funds from Operations and Our Ability to Make Distributions to Stockholders. We are subject to federal, state and local laws, regulations, rules and ordinances at locations where we operate regarding a wide variety of matters that could affect, directly or indirectly, our operations. Generally, we do not directly pass through costs resulting from compliance
Could happenwith or changes in real estate tax laws to residential property tenants. We also do not generally pass through increases in income, service or other taxes to tenants under leases. These costs may adversely affect net operating income and the ability to make distributions to stockholders. Similarly, compliance with or changes in (i) laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, (ii) laws and regulations regulating housing, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or (iii) employment related laws, among others, may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change may result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing communities and also may require us to spend more on our new development communities without a corresponding increase in revenue. In addition, existing laws could be interpreted in a manner that restricts our ability to use systems that we currently use in our operations and we may face litigation or regulatory risk in connection with such laws. Future compliance with new laws of general applicability, laws applicable to companies in our industry, or laws applicable to public companies generally could increase our costs and could have an adverse effect on our financial performance.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.