Vici Properties

None of the warning signs we check for were found.

We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.

We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 25 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 29 Jul 2026 and 6 later 8-Ks.

Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.

Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.

• We are subject to additional risks from our investments located outside the United States or on tribal land.

  Could happen

  In addition, certain of our investments, such as the North Fork loan, are secured by the property and assets of the borrower, including cash flows and revenues generated by the property, but excluding real property or any interests therein. Accordingly, investments where the underlying property is on tribal land may expose us to additional risks related to our ability to realize repayment of loaned amounts, the enforceability of contractual provisions, including limited waivers of sovereign immunity (to the extent applicable) and customary rights and remedies with respect to such investments or the assets secured as collateral, up to and including limitations on the ability to exercise customary foreclosure remedies in the event of a default. In addition, in the event of a foreclosure, the applicable borrower or its operating subsidiary may not be replaceable as operator of the gaming operations at such property and the assets of such borrower and its applicable subsidiaries may be insufficient to ensure payment in full to us of the amounts lent under such loan arrangements.

  Read moreShow less

• We are dependent on the gaming industry and may be susceptible to risks associated with it, including heightened competition, regulatory developments, changes in consumer behavior and discretionary spending, and the overall macroeconomic environment and outlook.

  Could happen

  As the landlord and owner of gaming facilities, we are impacted by risks associated with the gaming industry, which is characterized by a high degree of competition among a large number of industry participants, including brick and mortar casinos, riverboat casinos, video lottery, sweepstakes and poker machines not located in casinos, Native American gaming, and internet gaming, sports betting and other forms of gaming and betting in the United States, including emerging platforms such as prediction markets. These prediction markets, which allow users to wager on sports and other events under federal commodities regulation rather than state gaming oversight, have experienced rapid growth and currently operate in states where traditional sports betting remains illegal, creating potential competitive disadvantages for operators subject to state gaming licensing, taxation, and regulatory requirements. To the extent such platforms continue operating with reduced regulatory burdens, our tenants may face material competitive disadvantages that could directly impact their operating performance and, consequently, the rent we receive and the value of our properties. More broadly, gaming operators face competition from all manner of leisure and entertainment activities. Gaming competition is intense in most of the markets where our facilities are located, and may continue to increase as a result of, among other things, the expansion or improvement of facilities by existing market participants, the availability of additional licenses in a given jurisdiction, the entrance of new gaming participants into a market, increased internet gaming, sports betting, and trading on prediction markets, or legislative changes in various jurisdictions (including those relating to the foregoing). As competing properties and new markets are opened, our tenants’ businesses may be adversely impacted and as a result we may be negatively impacted. Additionally, the casino entertainment industry represents a significant source of tax revenues to the various jurisdictions in which casinos operate. From time to time, various state and federal legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax laws, or in the administration of such laws, including increases in tax rates, which would affect our gaming tenants and the industry. If adopted, such changes could adversely impact the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of our gaming tenants, including our significant tenants, and the broader outlook for the gaming industry.

  Read moreShow less

• Our lending activities involve distinct risks compared to our acquisition and leasing of real estate, including with respect to development and construction loans for non-stabilized properties which carry additional risks, including cost overruns, completion delays, operational underperformance, and other issues that could have a material adverse effect on us.

  Could happen

  Certain of our debt investments are investments in development and construction loans. These loans typically involve future funding obligations and may be riskier than other types of loans as a result of potential cost overruns, construction delays and uncertainty as to the future financial performance of the underlying property. Further, under the terms of these loans, we may be obligated to fund all or a significant portion of such loans at one or more future dates, including on a delayed draw basis, and we may not have the funds available on attractive terms, or at all, at such time to meet our funding obligations under our funding commitments. If we fail to meet our funding obligations, we would likely be in breach of such obligations unless we are able to raise the funds from alternative sources, which we may not be able to achieve on favorable terms or at all, or make other arrangements.

  Read moreShow less

• Financial difficulties experienced by any of our tenants, borrowers or guarantors, including their potential bankruptcy or insolvency, could result in defaults under, or requests to modify or terminate, their lease agreements, related guarantees or loan agreements, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business.

  Already happened

  Adverse developments affecting any of them, whether arising from conditions in the markets in which a tenant operates, the performance of such tenant’s portfolio or individual properties therein, or broader economic or industry factors, could impair such tenant’s ability to perform its obligations under its lease agreement with us. In such circumstances, a tenant could default on its obligations or, in advance thereof or in connection therewith, seek to modify or renegotiate its lease agreement with us, including with respect to economic provisions (such as rent escalators, base rental payments, capital expenditure requirements, or other provisions), covenants, or changes with respect to the composition of properties under the lease agreement (including the potential sale or disposition of such properties, whether to the tenant or other third parties). A tenant also could take other actions that could impact us, including seeking the ability to sell certain of its operations at our properties, electing not to renew its lease at maturity or pursuing a strategic transaction. Any such modification, non-renewal, strategic transaction or other action could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, the value of the underlying real estate or our ability to re-lease such real estate on comparable terms, or at all. These risks are heightened with respect to our larger tenants due to, among other things, the concentration of our revenues received from them. For example, market commentary has arisen regarding the performance of properties we lease to Caesars under the Caesars Regional Master Lease and the potential impact of such performance on the Company. This recent performance and related market narratives has adversely affected the market price of our common stock and may adversely affect our business and financial performance.

  Read moreShow less

• Our lending activities involve distinct risks compared to our acquisition and leasing of real estate, including with respect to development and construction loans for non-stabilized properties which carry additional risks, including cost overruns, completion delays, operational underperformance, and other issues that could have a material adverse effect on us.

  Could happen

  Furthermore, there could be other adverse impacts associated with the funding of development, construction or pre-stabilization loans, including increased costs that the borrower is unable or unwilling to pay, and other negative consequences, up to and including a bankruptcy filing by the borrower if they fail to fund their portion of the development project or experience cost overruns or other negative developments that impair their ability to complete the project and commence operations. In addition, other negative developments including construction delays, disruptions in supply chains, cost increases associated with building materials and construction services, environmental and remediation efforts, and costs or difficulties associated with obtaining construction permits and complying with local regulations, availability and cost of labor, and cost overruns, as well as changes in the value of collateral during construction or prior to stabilization, may adversely affect our investments or our realization of the anticipated benefits from such investments. In addition, borrowers may not have access to capital, which in turn, may result in the borrower’s inability to complete the project or, in the case of a construction loan, repay our loan in full or on a timely basis. In such cases, the borrower could default on its obligations or, in advance thereof or in connection therewith, seek to modify or renegotiate the terms of its loan agreement with us, including with respect to economic provisions, covenants, or other changes. Such borrowers could also take other actions that could impact us, including seeking to sell the development or operations, or other strategic action that does not align with our interests as a lender.

  Read moreShow less