Western Alliance Bancorporation
WAL on NYSE. Western Alliance Bancorporation sells loans, deposits, and payment services to businesses and individuals. Market value $8.3bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Cash flow or capital spending isn't reported, so free cash flow is unknown.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
Yearly profit per dollar of owners' money: 13 cents. Above 10 is good.
What you pay for each dollar of net assets: $1.06.
Profit per $100 you pay: $11.84.
Quality score: 96 of 100. Price score: 98 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$76.09 a share, 16% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $65.82 to $97.23.
Dividend: 2.1% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $38m | $44m | $99m | $68m | $136m |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.11bn | 0.11bn | 0.11bn | 0.11bn | 0.11bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Accounting checksDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- DebtDoesn't apply to banks and insurers
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 37.9% a year
- Buying back its own sharesRoughly flat
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $46 million last quarter, up 94% on a year ago.
- Profit: $262 million, up 14% on a year ago.
- 1% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $15m |
| December 2024 | $22m |
| March 2025 | $23m |
| June 2025 | $24m |
| September 2025 | $25m |
| December 2025 | $65m |
| March 2026 | $67m |
| June 2026 | $46m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $200m |
| December 2024 | $217m |
| March 2025 | $199m |
| June 2025 | $230m |
| September 2025 | $253m |
| December 2025 | $286m |
| March 2026 | $182m |
| June 2026 | $262m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 23 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 30 October 2026
Who owns it
3 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 3 last quarter. 495 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $174m | 0.5% | Cut |
| Smead Capital ManagementBill Smead | $131m | 2.8% | Added |
| Miller Value PartnersBill Miller IV | $3m | 0.8% | Cut |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$927mAdded
- Price T Rowe Associates$519mCut
- Invesco$483mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$447mAdded
- AQR Capital Management$423mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$384m
- Wellington Management Group LLP$361mCut
- State Street$351m
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$331mAdded
- Davis Asset Management, L.P.$274mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
4 investors own more than 5%.
- T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.Passive investor5.8%−1.4 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- Invesco Ltd.Passive investor5.4%+0.7 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.0%Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor5.0%Since 30 June 2026
- STATE STREET CORPORATIONPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2025
- Barrow HanleyPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. Passive investor | 5.8%−1.4 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
Invesco Ltd. Passive investor | 5.4%+0.7 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.0% | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 5.0% | 30 June 2026 | |
STATE STREET CORPORATION Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2025 | |
Barrow Hanley Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $308,000 of shares on the open market. 3 sold $6m.
- GIBBONS DALEVice Chair and CBO, DepositsSold
- Date
- 9 June 2026
- Shares
- 40,000
- Price
- $82.39
- Value
- $3m
- Mucha BenChief Accounting OfficerSold
- Date
- 8 June 2026
- Shares
- 5,946
- Price
- $81.00
- Value
- $481,626
- Mucha BenChief Accounting OfficerSold
- Date
- 18 February 2026
- Shares
- 641
- Price
- $95.62
- Value
- $61,292
- JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYDDirectorSold
- Date
- 15 December 2025
- Shares
- 23,142
- Price
- $87.05
- Value
- $2m
- GIBBONS DALEVice Chairman and CFOBought
- Date
- 30 October 2025
- Shares
- 4,000
- Price
- $77.00
- Value
- $308,000
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 June 2026 | GIBBONS DALE Vice Chair and CBO, Deposits | Sold | 40,000 | $82.39 | $3m |
| 8 June 2026 | Mucha Ben Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 5,946 | $81.00 | $481,626 |
| 18 February 2026 | Mucha Ben Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 641 | $95.62 | $61,292 |
| 15 December 2025 | JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD Director | Sold | 23,142 | $87.05 | $2m |
| 30 October 2025 | GIBBONS DALE Vice Chairman and CFO | Bought | 4,000 | $77.00 | $308,000 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 23 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 31 Jul 2026 and 8 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The development and use of AI presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business
Could happenAI models, particularly generative or agentic AI models, may produce outputs or take action that is incorrect, that reflects biases included in the data on which they are trained, that results in the release of private, confidential, or proprietary information, that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it difficult to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI models, understanding and monitoring the capabilities of the AI models, reducing erroneous output, eliminating bias, and complying with regulations that require documentation or explanation of the basis on which decisions are made. Further, we may rely on AI models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with output of their models, matters over which we may have limited visibility. Any of these risks could expose us to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm our reputation and the public perception of our business or the effectiveness of our security measures.
Read moreThe development and use of AI presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business
Could happenWe or our third-party (or fourth-party) vendors, customers or counterparties develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services or products. The development and use of AI presents a number of risks and challenges, including concerns around safety and soundness, privacy and data-handling, fair access to financial services, fair treatment to customers, inaccuracy of results broadly known as “hallucinations” and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, both in the U.S. and internationally, and includes regulatory schemes targeted specifically at AI as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in our implementation of AI technology and increase our compliance costs and the risks to us of non-compliance.
Read moreOur loan portfolio contains concentrations in certain business lines or product types that have unique risk characteristics and may expose us to increased lending risks.
Already happenedWe also extend credit to certain NDFIs, which provide services similar to traditional banks but do not accept deposits from the general public and are not regulated by federal or state banking agencies. Banks that extend credit to NDFIs may be less likely to detect fraud, whether committed by the NDFI or by an underlying borrower, pledgor or guarantor of the NDFI, or other underlying credit issues, than for loans to traditional commercial borrowers, due to the lack of a direct relationship between the bank and the third parties and collateral underlying the loan. We experienced potential fraud in connection with an extension of credit to an NDFI in the third quarter of 2025 that resulted in the establishment of a $29.6 million specific reserve, as discussed in more detail in Recent Developments within Item 7 of this Form 10-K. Approximately $14.7 billion, or 25.0% of our total HFI loans are loans to NDFIs. While we carefully underwrite and monitor extensions of credit to NDFIs in accordance with our policies, any undetected fraud or underlying credit issues could have a material adverse impact on our financial conditions and results of operations.
Read moreThe price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, which could result in losses to our investors and litigation against us.
Could happen• actions of activist stockholders could impact the pursuit of our business strategies, cause us to incur substantial costs, and divert management's and the Board's attention and resources;
Regulatory compliance requirements and expense likely will increase when we reach $100 billion in assets.
Could happenRegulatory requirements and associated costs generally increase based on a bank holding company’s consolidated asset tier. Upon exceeding the $100 billion in assets threshold, we will become subject to Category IV enhanced prudential standards. As of December 31, 2025, we had $92.8 billion in assets on a consolidated basis. Under such enhanced prudential standards, Category IV bank holding companies are subject to greater regulation and supervision, including, but not limited to: certain capital planning and stress testing and capital buffer requirements; supervisory capital stress testing conducted by the FRB biennially; and certain liquidity risk management and liquidity stress testing and buffer requirements. Our preparations for, and the application of, these enhanced prudential standards and resolution planning requirements for our depository institution could adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance through additional capital and liquidity requirements and increased compliance costs. While compliance costs associated with those and other Category IV regulations are expected to be substantial, we believe a considerable portion of these costs have already been incurred as we have proactively upgraded compliance systems, processes, and staffing in anticipation of surpassing the $100 billion asset mark.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.