Cactus
WHD on NYSE. Cactus sells wellhead and pressure control equipment to oil and gas drillers. Market value $3.0bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Some use the latest annual report instead, as marked. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Cash flow or capital spending isn't reported, so free cash flow is unknown.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
We could not compute this from the filings.
You pay 16.2 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 31 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 90 of 100. Price score: 62 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$64.17 a share, 93% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $33.20 to $74.07.
Dividend: 0.8% a year
Paid every year for at least 5 years
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $439m | $688m | $1.1bn | $1.1bn | $1.1bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 17.2% | 25.4% | 24.1% | 25.6% | 23.2% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positiveNot enough data
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)6 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.01× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 25.4% a year
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $450 million last quarter, up 64% on a year ago.
- Profit: $49 million, up 21% on a year ago.
- It keeps 19 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, down from 25 cents a year earlier.
- It has $348 million more cash than debt, down from $386 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 2 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $293m |
| December 2024 | $272m |
| March 2025 | $280m |
| June 2025 | $274m |
| September 2025 | $264m |
| December 2025 | $261m |
| March 2026 | $388m |
| June 2026 | $450m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $50m |
| December 2024 | $47m |
| March 2025 | $44m |
| June 2025 | $40m |
| September 2025 | $42m |
| December 2025 | $40m |
| March 2026 | $33m |
| June 2026 | $49m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 26 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 30 October 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 5 last quarter. 342 funds in all.
- GMOJeremy Grantham
- Value
- $20m
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $534,329
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $235m | 0.2% | New |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $29m | 0.2% | Added |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $20m | <0.1% | |
| Hotchkis & WileyHotchkis & Wiley team | $9m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $534,329 | <0.1% |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$546mAdded
- Boston Partners$235mNew
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$218mAdded
- State Street$161mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$160m
- Wellington Management Group LLP$134mCut
- Geode Capital Management$111mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$96mAdded
- Capital International Investors$93mAdded
- T. Rowe Price Investment Management$92mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
8 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor14.2%Since 30 September 2025
- Joel BenderPassive investorat least 12.4%−0.6 pts(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 December 2025
- Boston PartnersPassive investor6.4%Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.1%Since 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.2%Since 31 March 2026
- Wellington Management Company LLPPassive investor5.2%Since 31 December 2025
- Wellington Management Group LLPPassive investorat least 4.2%−1.6 pts(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 March 2026
- FMR LLCPassive investorat least 3.5%−2.9 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 14.2% | 30 September 2025 | |
Joel Bender Passive investor | at least 12.4%−0.6 pts (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 December 2025 | |
Boston Partners Passive investor | 6.4% | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.1% | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 March 2026 | |
Wellington Management Company LLP Passive investor | 5.2% | 31 December 2025 | |
Wellington Management Group LLP Passive investor | at least 4.2%−1.6 pts (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 March 2026 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | at least 3.5%−2.9 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
No insider bought shares on the open market in the last 12 months. 8 sold $77m, $39m of it under preset trading plans.
- Bender ScottChairman and CEO, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 1 October 2026
- Shares
- 100,000
- Price
- $61.97
- Value
- $6m
- Bender JoelPresident, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 1 October 2026
- Shares
- 100,000
- Price
- $61.97
- Value
- $6m
- Bender JoelPresident, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 1 September 2026
- Shares
- 100,000
- Price
- $70.37
- Value
- $7m
- Bender ScottChairman and CEO, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 1 September 2026
- Shares
- 100,000
- Price
- $70.37
- Value
- $7m
- Bender StevenCOO, EVP and CEO-SpoolableTechSold
- Date
- 7 August 2026
- Shares
- 25,000
- Price
- $67.65
- Value
- $2m
- ODONNELL JOHN ADirectorSold
- Date
- 5 August 2026
- Shares
- 10,000
- Price
- $66.13
- Value
- $661,306
- MARSH WILLIAM DGC, EVP and SecretarySold
- Date
- 5 August 2026
- Shares
- 7,178
- Price
- $66.32
- Value
- $476,010
- Tadlock StephenEVP/CEO Cactus IntlSold
- Date
- 3 August 2026
- Shares
- 38,455
- Price
- $63.80
- Value
- $2m
- Bender ScottChairman and CEO, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 August 2026
- Shares
- 100,000
- Price
- $63.89
- Value
- $6m
- Bender JoelPresident, DirectorSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 3 August 2026
- Shares
- 100,000
- Price
- $63.89
- Value
- $6m
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 October 2026 | Bender Scott Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 100,000 | $61.97 | $6m |
| 1 October 2026 | Bender Joel President, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 100,000 | $61.97 | $6m |
| 1 September 2026 | Bender Joel President, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 100,000 | $70.37 | $7m |
| 1 September 2026 | Bender Scott Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 100,000 | $70.37 | $7m |
| 7 August 2026 | Bender Steven COO, EVP and CEO-SpoolableTech | Sold | 25,000 | $67.65 | $2m |
| 5 August 2026 | ODONNELL JOHN A Director | Sold | 10,000 | $66.13 | $661,306 |
| 5 August 2026 | MARSH WILLIAM D GC, EVP and Secretary | Sold | 7,178 | $66.32 | $476,010 |
| 3 August 2026 | Tadlock Stephen EVP/CEO Cactus Intl | Sold | 38,455 | $63.80 | $2m |
| 3 August 2026 | Bender Scott Chairman and CEO, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 100,000 | $63.89 | $6m |
| 3 August 2026 | Bender Joel President, Director | Sold under a preset trading plan | 100,000 | $63.89 | $6m |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 31 Jul 2026 and 7 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The Baker Hughes Transaction represents an expansion outside of our current geographic regions, and we may encounter new obstacles operating in different geographic regions.
Could happenPrior to the Baker Hughes Transaction, our operations historically focused on the United States. The Baker Hughes Transaction represents an expansion of our operations in the Middle East and other jurisdictions. Certain aspects related to operating in these new jurisdictions may not be as familiar to us as the jurisdictions in which we operated prior to the Baker Hughes Transaction. As a result, we may encounter obstacles that may cause us not to achieve the expected results of the Baker Hughes Transaction. These obstacles may include a less familiar and more volatile geopolitical landscape, new customers with whom we have no established relationship and just a small number of which account for the preponderance of the Joint Venture’s revenue, pressure from local governments to hire local associates, use local suppliers or to direct business to nationalized companies, unfamiliar operating conditions, and a distinct regulatory environment. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage this expanded business, which may pose substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and jurisdictions and associated increased costs and complexity. We may also face increased scrutiny from governmental authorities as a result of the increase in the size of our business. Any adverse conditions, regulations or developments related to our expansion into or within these new jurisdictions may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Read moreWe may be required to acquire Baker Hughes Company’s interests in the Joint Venture.
Could happenGenerally beginning on January 1, 2028, the Baker Member has the right to sell to either the Joint Venture or the Cactus Member, and the Joint Venture or the Cactus Member, as applicable, shall be obligated to purchase all of the Membership Interests held by Baker Hughes Company (the “Put Right”). The purchase price (the “Exit Price”) will be based on an enterprise value of the Joint Venture using a multiple of six times its TTM Adjusted EBITDA (as defined and calculated in the Joint Venture LLC Agreement), subject to a maximum valuation of $660.0 million. If the Baker Member exercises the Put Right, we may not have sufficient liquidity to fund the Exit Price. We may be required to access external financing, and we may be unable to do so on favorable terms, or at all. Accordingly, our obligation to fund the Exit Price may adversely affect our liquidity and cause us to enter into financing arrangements with terms that are unfavorable to us.
Read moreThe Joint Venture LLC Agreement restricts certain of our or the Joint Venture’s actions.
Could happenFor so long as Baker Hughes Company owns interests in the Joint Venture, we must, subject to certain exceptions, cause the Joint Venture to operate its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and not take certain actions that could reasonably be expected to reduce the Exit Price. Certain significant actions of the Joint Venture require the approval of Baker Hughes Company. Such restrictions may limit the ability of the Joint Venture to take actions that we believe to be beneficial to our business, results of operations and financial condition, or those of the Joint Venture. It is possible that disputes arise between us and Baker Hughes Company concerning our operation of the Joint Venture and such disputes could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Read moreThe Joint Venture LLC Agreement restricts certain of our or the Joint Venture’s actions.
Could happenFor so long as Baker Hughes Company owns interests in the Joint Venture, we are required to conduct the surface pressure control business in the countries where the Acquired Business operated prior to our acquisition only through the Joint Venture, subject to certain exceptions. These restrictions mean that certain new opportunities will be directed to the Joint Venture and not us, which may reduce the direct benefit that we receive from such new opportunities.
Read moreWe may experience difficulties in integrating the operations of the Joint Venture into our business.
Could happenThe success of the Baker Hughes Transaction depends in part on our ability to successfully integrate the operations of the Joint Venture into our business. The integration process could take longer than anticipated and could result in the loss of key employees from the Company and/or the Joint Venture, the disruption of the Company’s and/or the Joint Venture’s ongoing businesses, tax costs or inefficiencies, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, information technology systems, procedures or policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers, employees or other third parties, or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Baker Hughes Transaction, and could harm our financial performance. Prior to the Baker Hughes Transaction, we did not have any significant infrastructure in most of the countries where the Joint Venture is doing business. As a result, Baker Hughes Company is providing the Joint Venture with limited transition services. If Baker Hughes Company fails to continue providing these transition services, or if we are unable to successfully or timely integrate and support the operations of the Joint Venture, we may incur unanticipated liabilities and be unable to realize the revenue growth, synergies and other anticipated benefits resulting from the Baker Hughes Transaction, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.