Cars.com
CARS on NYSE. Cars.com sells car listings and dealer tools to car dealers and shoppers. Market value $519m.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $25.18 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 11.1 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 5 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 76 of 100. Price score: 100 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$9.45 a share, 28% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $7.40 to $13.69.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $624m | $654m | $689m | $719m | $723m |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 7.8% | 10.1% | 7.9% | 7.4% | 8.3% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 1.20 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.96 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.07bn | 0.07bn | 0.06bn | 0.06bn | 0.05bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)8 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)No
- Debt0.96× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 5.7% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 20% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $180 million last quarter, up 1% on a year ago.
- Profit: $14 million, up 103% on a year ago.
- It keeps 11 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 7 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $127 million, up from $114 million.
- 11% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $414 million more than cash, down from $428 million a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $180m |
| December 2024 | $180m |
| March 2025 | $179m |
| June 2025 | $179m |
| September 2025 | $182m |
| December 2025 | $184m |
| March 2026 | $180m |
| June 2026 | $180m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $19m |
| December 2024 | $17m |
| March 2025 | -$2m |
| June 2025 | $7m |
| September 2025 | $8m |
| December 2025 | $7m |
| March 2026 | $5m |
| June 2026 | $14m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 26 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 5 November 2026
Who owns it
6 long-term investors we follow own it, unchanged from 6 last quarter. 200 funds in all.
- GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli
- Value
- $218,800
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
- Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team
- Value
- $9,211
- Share of fund
- <0.1%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $5m | <0.1% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $1m | <0.1% | Added |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $1m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $218,800 | <0.1% | |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $163,083 | <0.1% | New |
| Barrow HanleyBarrow Hanley team | $9,211 | <0.1% |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- FMR$92mCut
- BlackRock$46mCut
- Pale Fire Capital SE$44m
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$37m
- Hill Path Capital LP$27m
- Brown Advisory$26m
- Vanguard Capital Management$26mCut
- Breach Inlet Capital Management$24mAdded
- American Century Companies$23mAdded
- JPMorgan Chase$18mAdded
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
4 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor7.1%−6.7 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- FAMILY TRUST PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE LINDA AHMED DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED MARCH 4, 2005Passive investorat least 7.0%(filed with 4 related holders)Since 10 March 2026
- PALE FIRE CAPITAL SEPassive investorat least 5.9%(filed with 4 related holders)Since 27 February 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investor5.0%Since 30 June 2025
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 7.1%−6.7 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
FAMILY TRUST PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE LINDA AHMED DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED MARCH 4, 2005 Passive investor | at least 7.0% (filed with 4 related holders) | 10 March 2026 | |
PALE FIRE CAPITAL SE Passive investor | at least 5.9% (filed with 4 related holders) | 27 February 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | 5.0% | 30 June 2025 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $15,082 of shares on the open market. 4 sold $2m, $153,330 of it under preset trading plans.
- McGovern Jr. Donald A.DirectorSold
- Date
- 20 August 2026
- Shares
- 8,000
- Price
- $12.25
- Value
- $98,000
- Marks Angelique StrongChief Legal OfficerSold
- Date
- 17 August 2026
- Shares
- 57,980
- Price
- $11.94
- Value
- $692,281
- Jain SoniaChief Financial OfficerSold
- Date
- 12 June 2026
- Shares
- 34,021
- Price
- $9.49
- Value
- $322,859
- Jain SoniaChief Financial OfficerSold
- Date
- 11 June 2026
- Shares
- 52,579
- Price
- $9.56
- Value
- $502,655
- Ross JenellDirectorBought
- Date
- 13 March 2026
- Shares
- 1,995
- Price
- $7.56
- Value
- $15,082
- Jain SoniaChief Financial OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 17 December 2025
- Shares
- 11,400
- Price
- $13.45
- Value
- $153,330
- Crawford Matthew B.Chief Product Innovation Off.Sold
- Date
- 2 December 2025
- Shares
- 27,358
- Price
- $12.03
- Value
- $329,117
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 August 2026 | McGovern Jr. Donald A. Director | Sold | 8,000 | $12.25 | $98,000 |
| 17 August 2026 | Marks Angelique Strong Chief Legal Officer | Sold | 57,980 | $11.94 | $692,281 |
| 12 June 2026 | Jain Sonia Chief Financial Officer | Sold | 34,021 | $9.49 | $322,859 |
| 11 June 2026 | Jain Sonia Chief Financial Officer | Sold | 52,579 | $9.56 | $502,655 |
| 13 March 2026 | Ross Jenell Director | Bought | 1,995 | $7.56 | $15,082 |
| 17 December 2025 | Jain Sonia Chief Financial Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 11,400 | $13.45 | $153,330 |
| 2 December 2025 | Crawford Matthew B. Chief Product Innovation Off. | Sold | 27,358 | $12.03 | $329,117 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 6 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
The increased use, development and regulation of generative AI, including generative AI and agentic AI technologies, could materially and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenIn addition, competitors, OEMs, dealers or other third parties may use AI to replicate, enhance or replace functionality currently provided by our platforms, including vehicle listings, pricing analysis, editorial content, lead generation tools and valuation products. If we are unable to develop, deploy or integrate AI-enabled features at a pace that meets customer expectations, or if our AI-enabled solutions are perceived as less effective or less reliable than those of competitors, our competitive position, customer retention and growth prospects could be harmed. AI systems may produce inaccurate, misleading or otherwise flawed outputs. If AI-generated outputs are relied upon by consumers, dealers or OEMs and are perceived as unreliable or inconsistent with consumer and customer expectations, our reputation, brand value and customer relationships could be harmed.
Read moreIf the use of third-party cookies or other tracking technologies is rejected by Internet browsers or service providers or users, restricted or blocked, or subject to unfavorable laws or regulations, the amount of Internet user information would decrease, which may harm our business and operating results.
Could happenIn addition, state, federal and international governmental authorities continue to evaluate the privacy implications inherent in the use of cookies and other tracking technologies and have enacted or are considering enacting laws or regulations that could significantly restrict the ability of companies to use third-party cookies and other online tracking technologies, such as those that require recognition of universal opt-out mechanisms like the Global Privacy Control. Courts, too, have evaluated privacy-related implications associated with website tracking technologies, often allowing litigants to pursue legal action (including in the form of class actions) under certain wiretapping statutes when individuals have not consented to such tracking.
Read moreThe increased use, development and regulation of generative AI, including generative AI and agentic AI technologies, could materially and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Could happenThe development and deployment of AI technologies also involve significant costs and risks. Implementing AI-enabled solutions may require substantial investment in data infrastructure, computing resources, third-party technologies and specialized personnel, and such investments may not result in improved products, operational efficiencies or increased revenue. The legal and regulatory environment governing AI is rapidly evolving. Laws, including recently-enacted state laws, proposed laws and recent Executive Orders addressing regulation and policies related to AI may create inconsistent compliance obligations, which may be costly, challenging and difficult to resolve. Existing laws and regulations relating to data privacy, intellectual property, consumer protection, advertising practices and algorithmic decision-making are also increasingly being interpreted or applied in new ways to AI-enabled products. Compliance with such requirements could increase our costs, limit our ability to use data effectively or require changes to our products or business practices, or, if we fail to comply, it could expose us to fines, penalties and litigation. If we are unable to effectively manage the operational, competitive, regulatory and reputational risks associated with AI, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Read moreIf the use of third-party cookies or other tracking technologies is rejected by Internet browsers or service providers or users, restricted or blocked, or subject to unfavorable laws or regulations, the amount of Internet user information would decrease, which may harm our business and operating results.
Already happenedThe largest mobile operating systems are iOS and Android, and both impose limitations on the ability of cookies or similar technologies to track consumers. In addition, Apple introduced changes to its iOS operating system that require users to affirmatively opt in to allow applications to track their activity for advertising purposes. A significant number of users have elected to disable such tracking, which has inhibited our ability to retarget users who access our mobile applications and have opted out of ad tracking and limited our ability to attribute advertising performance across devices and platforms.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.