ZoomInfo Technologies
GTM on Nasdaq. ZoomInfo sells software and data about companies and people to sales and marketing teams. Market value $1.1bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Recent profit includes a big one-time charge, so we price the company excluding that charge.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing stood out in the numbers we check.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $33.72 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 10.5 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 4 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 85 of 100. Price score: 66 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$3.65 a share, 44% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $2.54 to $12.31.
Pays no dividend
Prices from Tuesday’s close (6 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $747m | $1.1bn | $1.2bn | $1.2bn | $1.2bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 15.2% | 16.0% | 20.9% | 8.0% | 18.1% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.88 |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.40bn | 0.39bn | 0.38bn | 0.31bn | 0.29bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Not enough data
- Financial strength (Piotroski)7 of 8 checks we could run
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)Yes
- Debt0.88× equity
- Revenue growth, five yearsStrong, 21.3% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 28% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $310 million last quarter, up 1% on a year ago.
- A loss of $644 million, after a profit of $24 million a year ago.
- It loses 35 cents on each $1 of sales, after keeping 15 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $358 million, up from $278 million.
- 10% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $1.1 billion more than cash, down from $1.2 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in each of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $304m |
| December 2024 | $309m |
| March 2025 | $306m |
| June 2025 | $307m |
| September 2025 | $318m |
| December 2025 | $319m |
| March 2026 | $310m |
| June 2026 | $310m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $24m |
| December 2024 | $15m |
| March 2025 | $27m |
| June 2025 | $24m |
| September 2025 | $39m |
| December 2025 | $35m |
| March 2026 | $29m |
| June 2026 | -$644m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 12 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 4 November 2026
Who owns it
5 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 4 last quarter. 332 funds in all.
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $38m | <0.1% | Added |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $14m | <0.1% | Added |
| Royce & AssociatesChuck Royce | $932,927 | <0.1% | New |
| ValueWorksCharles Lemonides | $586,000 | 0.1% | New |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $263,082 | <0.1% | Cut |
Sold out this quarter
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$123mAdded
- AQR Capital Management$47mAdded
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LP$40mCut
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$38m
- LSV Asset Management$38mAdded
- State Street$33mAdded
- Vanguard Capital Management$31mCut
- Jupiter Asset Management$24mAdded
- Geode Capital Management$22mAdded
- FMR$20mCut
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
6 investors own more than 5%.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor13.1%+2.5 ptsSince 30 June 2026
- Schuck HenryPassive investorat least 8.4%(filed with 2 related holders)Since 31 December 2024
- Ahmet H. OkumusPassive investor7.1%Since 12 January 2026
- Jennifer StierPassive investorat least 6.9%+2.2 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 12 June 2026
What they said
Item 4 of the Schedule 13D is hereby amended and supplemented as follows: General The Reporting Persons acquired the securities described in this Schedule 13D for investment purposes and they intend to review their investments in the Issuer on a continuing basis. Any actions the…
Read the filing - Jennifer StierPassive investor6.7%+1.4 ptsSince 13 February 2026
- AQR Capital Management, LLCPassive investorat least 5.5%(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Dimensional Fund Advisors LPPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- Ahmet H. OkumusPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- FMR LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- Dragoneer Investment Group, LLCPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 December 2024
- Glenview Capital ManagementPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 30 June 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 13.1%+2.5 pts | 30 June 2026 | |
Schuck Henry Passive investor | at least 8.4% (filed with 2 related holders) | 31 December 2024 | |
Ahmet H. Okumus Passive investor | 7.1% | 12 January 2026 | |
Jennifer Stier Passive investor | at least 6.9%+2.2 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 12 June 2026 | What they saidItem 4 of the Schedule 13D is hereby amended and supplemented as follows: General The Reporting Persons acquired the securities described in this Schedule 13D for investment purposes and they intend to review their investments in the Issuer on a continuing basis. Any actions the… Read the filing |
Jennifer Stier Passive investor | 6.7%+1.4 pts | 13 February 2026 | |
AQR Capital Management, LLC Passive investor | at least 5.5% (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
Ahmet H. Okumus Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
FMR LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
Dragoneer Investment Group, LLC Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 December 2024 | |
Glenview Capital Management Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 30 June 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 1 insider bought $99,000 of shares on the open market. 3 sold $824,869, $756,642 of it under preset trading plans.
- Roth James MChief Revenue OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 94
- Price
- $4.17
- Value
- $392
- McGrane AshleyGeneral Counsel and Corp SecSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 34
- Price
- $4.17
- Value
- $142
- McGrane AshleyGeneral Counsel and Corp SecSold
- Date
- 7 August 2026
- Shares
- 16,400
- Price
- $4.16
- Value
- $68,227
- O'Brien Michael GrahamCFOSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 6 August 2026
- Shares
- 5,000
- Price
- $4.00
- Value
- $20,003
- McGrane AshleyGeneral Counsel and Corp SecSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 4 August 2026
- Shares
- 997
- Price
- $3.56
- Value
- $3,553
- Roth James MChief Revenue OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 July 2026
- Shares
- 20,774
- Price
- $2.98
- Value
- $61,927
- McGrane AshleyGeneral Counsel and Corp SecSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 July 2026
- Shares
- 2,461
- Price
- $2.98
- Value
- $7,331
- Roth James MChief Revenue OfficerSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 June 2026
- Shares
- 200
- Price
- $3.55
- Value
- $710
- McGrane AshleyGeneral Counsel and Corp SecSoldunder a preset trading plan
- Date
- 2 June 2026
- Shares
- 34
- Price
- $3.55
- Value
- $121
- Maida DomenicDirectorBought
- Date
- 26 May 2026
- Shares
- 27,500
- Price
- $3.60
- Value
- $99,000
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 September 2026 | Roth James M Chief Revenue Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 94 | $4.17 | $392 |
| 2 September 2026 | McGrane Ashley General Counsel and Corp Sec | Sold under a preset trading plan | 34 | $4.17 | $142 |
| 7 August 2026 | McGrane Ashley General Counsel and Corp Sec | Sold | 16,400 | $4.16 | $68,227 |
| 6 August 2026 | O'Brien Michael Graham CFO | Sold under a preset trading plan | 5,000 | $4.00 | $20,003 |
| 4 August 2026 | McGrane Ashley General Counsel and Corp Sec | Sold under a preset trading plan | 997 | $3.56 | $3,553 |
| 2 July 2026 | Roth James M Chief Revenue Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 20,774 | $2.98 | $61,927 |
| 2 July 2026 | McGrane Ashley General Counsel and Corp Sec | Sold under a preset trading plan | 2,461 | $2.98 | $7,331 |
| 2 June 2026 | Roth James M Chief Revenue Officer | Sold under a preset trading plan | 200 | $3.55 | $710 |
| 2 June 2026 | McGrane Ashley General Counsel and Corp Sec | Sold under a preset trading plan | 34 | $3.55 | $121 |
| 26 May 2026 | Maida Domenic Director | Bought | 27,500 | $3.60 | $99,000 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 12 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 5 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
Cheap for a reason is the question the numbers cannot answer.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
Our business could be negatively affected by changes in search engine algorithms, including search engine optimization (SEO), artificial intelligence optimization (AIO), and other traffic-generating arrangements and dynamics.
Could happenIn addition, in recent years, customer behavior and traffic acquisition dynamics have shifted, and may continue to shift, due to the increasing adoption of AI-powered search experiences and LLM models that provide responses without directing users to third-party websites, which could reduce click-through rates and materially diminish the value of traditional SEO strategies. If we are unable to ensure that our products and services, as well as our website and brand, continue to be visible and utilized by AI-powered search experiences and LLM models, or if we are unable to address and capitalize on online traffic dynamics resulting from AIO strategies, we may experience reduced inbound lead volume, higher customer acquisition costs, and greater reliance on more expensive marketing channels that may be less efficient or scalable. Any sustained decline in inbound demand could adversely affect our pipeline, customer acquisition costs, and revenue growth.
Read moreWe experience competition from other companies and technologies that allow businesses to gather and aggregate sales, marketing, recruiting, and other data, and we may in the future face competition from prominent large-language-model (LLM) providers and generative AI companies, and any of their competing products and services could provide greater appeal to our customers.
Could happenIn addition, the rapid advancement and widespread adoption of LLMs and generative AI technologies could result in new competitors in our industry. Prominent LLM providers and other leading generative AI companies, are developing increasingly sophisticated AI capabilities, and such technologies may incorporate business contact information, company intelligence and market insights directly into their models or make such data readily accessible through AI-enabled tools at substantially lower costs than our products and services, or even at no incremental cost to their end users. These LLM providers may aggregate and synthesize publicly available data sources, licensed datasets, or user-contributed information to generate business intelligence that overlaps with or competes directly with our products and services. As LLM capabilities improve, the quality, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of the business data they provide may approach or match levels that customers find acceptable for their go-to-market activities.
Read moreOther technology companies, including various small and medium-sized businesses who focus on B2B sales and marketing intelligence, have become, and larger and better-funded companies with significant resources may shift their existing business models to become, more competitive with us.
Could happenIn addition, existing and potential competitors in our industry may be able to offer more flexible pricing models that better align with the actual usage and realized value obtained by customers, including pay-as-you-go models or other bespoke pricing packages, that may be more desirable for small and mid-market customers who are more likely to be affected by budget constraints. Further, as AI-powered agents become more sophisticated, individual users may become substantially more productive, enabling customers to achieve similar outcomes with fewer seats accessing our platform. This AI-driven seat compression could result in customers reducing seat counts at renewal, negatively impacting our revenue even as they derive equal or greater value from our products and services.
Read moreChanges in laws, regulations, and public perception concerning data privacy, or changes in the patterns of enforcement of existing laws and regulations, could impact our ability to efficiently gather, process, update, and/or provide some or all of the information we currently provide or the ability of our customers and users to use some or all of our products or services.
Could happenTable of Content s Domestically, as members of the Republican Party now control both the White House and Congress, the national landscape has shifted. It is unclear whether members of Congress will have enough votes to pass a Federal privacy law and while AI remains a major topic of discussion in Congress, members of the Republican Party and the White House have indicated a pivot from comprehensive regulations in favor of fewer restrictions. In particular, on December 11, 2025, the Administration signed Executive Order 14365, “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence”, that seeks to limit the ability of states to regulate AI under their existing legal frameworks, and to deter them from passing new AI laws. Pursuant to the Executive Order, the Administration has stated that it will seek to establish an AI Litigation Task Force which will be responsible for challenging any state-level AI laws inconsistent with the policy set forth in Executive Order. Nevertheless, at Federal agencies, it remains unclear as to what the current Administration’s enforcement priorities will be and how the push to move away from additional regulations will be reflected at each relevant agency, including the extent to which agencies emphasize established statutory authorities (e.g., children’s privacy and data security) versus broader theories. As a result, certain states will continue to pursue both AI and privacy legislation. As of December 31, 2025, twenty states have implemented comprehensive privacy laws, and recently, additional states have pending legislation for both AI and privacy.
Read moreOur business could be negatively affected by changes in search engine algorithms, including search engine optimization (SEO), artificial intelligence optimization (AIO), and other traffic-generating arrangements and dynamics.
Could happenIf a major search engine or LLM model changes its algorithms or results in a manner that negatively affects our website’s search engine ranking or AIO placement, respectively, or if competitive dynamics impact the costs or effectiveness of SEO and/or AIO, marketing efforts relating to SEO and/or AIO strategies, or other traffic-generating arrangements in a negative manner, our business and financial performance would be adversely affected.
Read more
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.