Match Group
MTCH on Nasdaq. Match Group sells dating apps and subscription services to people seeking relationships. Market value $9.3bn.
Price checks use the past 12 months to June 2026. Quality checks use five annual reports, the latest for the year to December 2025.
Should I look at this?
Worth a closer look
Why it could be worth it
What to watch out for
Nothing big in our quick check. See what could go wrong below.
This is not advice. Check the numbers below.
For every $100 of what the whole company costs, it produced $12.33 of spare cash in the past 12 months. A savings account pays about $4.
You pay 12.4 years of operating profit for the business. The average large US company costs around 18.
Each dollar kept in the business earns 23 cents a year. Above 10 is good.
Quality score: 80 of 100. Price score: 99 of 100. Our list needs 70 on quality and 60 on price.
$40.33 a share, 40% above its 1-year low
Over the past year the price has ranged from $28.81 to $44.94.
Dividend: 2.0% a year
Paid in its latest year
Prices from Monday’s close (5 October).
Five years of cash, in billions
| Revenue | |||||
| Revenue | $3.0bn | $3.2bn | $3.4bn | $3.5bn | $3.5bn |
| Operating margin | |||||
| Operating margin | 28.5% | 16.2% | 27.3% | 23.7% | 25.0% |
| Debt to equity | |||||
| Debt to equity | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Shares outstanding | |||||
| Shares outstanding | 0.28bn | 0.27bn | 0.25bn | 0.24bn | 0.23bn |
Health checks
- Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years
- Accounting looks honest (Beneish)Nothing unusual
- Financial strength (Piotroski)7 of 9
- Profit backed by cash (accruals)No
- DebtUnknown
- Revenue growth, five yearsSlow, 7.8% a year
- Buying back its own sharesYes, 18% fewer since 2021
The quarter to June 2026
How the business did, compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
- Sales: $853 million last quarter, down 1% on a year ago.
- Profit: $171 million, up 36% on a year ago.
- It keeps 28 cents of each $1 of sales as operating profit, up from 23 cents a year earlier.
- Spare cash over the past 12 months: $1.1 billion, up from $908 million.
- 6% fewer shares than a year ago. Each share owns a bit more of the company.
- Debt is $3 billion more than cash, down from $3.1 billion a year ago.
- Sales grew on a year ago in 3 of the last 4 quarters.
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $895m |
| December 2024 | $860m |
| March 2025 | $831m |
| June 2025 | $864m |
| September 2025 | $914m |
| December 2025 | $878m |
| March 2026 | $864m |
| June 2026 | $853m |
| Quarter to | Amount |
|---|---|
| September 2024 | $136m |
| December 2024 | $158m |
| March 2025 | $118m |
| June 2025 | $125m |
| September 2025 | $161m |
| December 2025 | $210m |
| March 2026 | $167m |
| June 2026 | $171m |
From the company's quarterly reports to the SEC.
Dates
- Next results (estimated)
- n/a
- Last annual report (10-K)
- 26 February 2026
- Next quarterly (estimated, 10-Q)
- 4 November 2026
Who owns it
8 long-term investors we follow own it, up from 7 last quarter. 594 funds in all.
- First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners
- Value
- $140m
- Share of fund
- 0.4%
| Fund | Value | Share of that fund | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starboard ValueJeff Smith | $296m | 6.5% | Cut |
| LSV Asset ManagementJosef Lakonishok | $249m | 0.5% | Added |
| First Manhattan Co.First Manhattan partners | $140m | 0.4% | |
| Gotham Asset ManagementJoel Greenblatt | $42m | <0.1% | Added |
| Boston PartnersBoston Partners team | $40m | <0.1% | Cut |
| GMOJeremy Grantham | $11m | <0.1% | Added |
| Boyar Asset ManagementMark Boyar | $393,361 | 0.2% | Cut |
| GAMCO InvestorsMario Gabelli | $246,526 | <0.1% | New |
Largest holders overall
- BlackRock$1.1bn
- Ameriprise Financial$731mAdded
- Vanguard Portfolio Management$561m
- Vanguard Capital Management$400m
- Fuller & Thaler Asset Management$320mAdded
- State Street$315m
- AQR Capital Management$303mCut
- Starboard Value$296mCut
- LSV Asset Management$249mAdded
- UBS Group AG$247m
From 13F filings for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
Big holders and activists
6 investors own more than 5%; 1 of them is pushing for change.
- BlackRock, Inc.Passive investor11.9%+5.6 ptsSince 31 March 2026
- Ameriprise Financial, Inc.Passive investorat least 8.2%+2.5 pts(filed with 1 related holder)Since 30 June 2026
- Vanguard Portfolio ManagementPassive investor6.4%Since 31 March 2026
- Vanguard Capital ManagementPassive investor5.3%Since 31 March 2026
- SSGA FUNDS MANAGEMENT, INC.Passive investor5.1%Since 30 September 2025
- Starboard ValueActivistat least 4.6%(filed with 19 related holders)Since 4 May 2026
- STATE STREET CORPORATIONPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 31 March 2026
- The Vanguard GroupPassive investorSold down below 5%Since 13 March 2026
| Holder | Stake | Since | |
|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock, Inc. Passive investor | 11.9%+5.6 pts | 31 March 2026 | |
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Passive investor | at least 8.2%+2.5 pts (filed with 1 related holder) | 30 June 2026 | |
Vanguard Portfolio Management Passive investor | 6.4% | 31 March 2026 | |
Vanguard Capital Management Passive investor | 5.3% | 31 March 2026 | |
SSGA FUNDS MANAGEMENT, INC. Passive investor | 5.1% | 30 September 2025 | |
Starboard Value Activist | at least 4.6% (filed with 19 related holders) | 4 May 2026 | |
STATE STREET CORPORATION Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 31 March 2026 | |
The Vanguard Group Passive investor | Sold down below 5% | 13 March 2026 |
From Schedule 13D and 13G filings: anyone owning more than 5% must file one.
What insiders did
In the last 12 months, 2 insiders bought $555,650 of shares on the open market. 5 sold $3m.
- MCDANIEL ANNDirectorSold
- Date
- 2 September 2026
- Shares
- 3,531
- Price
- $42.43
- Value
- $149,811
- Eigenmann Philip DChief Accounting OfficerSold
- Date
- 28 August 2026
- Shares
- 15,000
- Price
- $41.70
- Value
- $625,499
- Bailey StephenDirectorSold
- Date
- 26 August 2026
- Shares
- 4,760
- Price
- $42.26
- Value
- $201,172
- Schiffman GlennDirectorBought
- Date
- 11 August 2026
- Shares
- 3,000
- Price
- $36.63
- Value
- $109,890
- Brenner Melissa AnneDirectorSold
- Date
- 8 May 2026
- Shares
- 5,141
- Price
- $35.94
- Value
- $184,768
- Hosseini HesamChief Operating OfficerSold
- Date
- 6 March 2026
- Shares
- 59,013
- Price
- $30.13
- Value
- $2m
- Rascoff Spencer MChief Executive Officer, DirectorBought
- Date
- 20 November 2025
- Shares
- 14,000
- Price
- $31.84
- Value
- $445,760
| Date | Who | Did | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 September 2026 | MCDANIEL ANN Director | Sold | 3,531 | $42.43 | $149,811 |
| 28 August 2026 | Eigenmann Philip D Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 15,000 | $41.70 | $625,499 |
| 26 August 2026 | Bailey Stephen Director | Sold | 4,760 | $42.26 | $201,172 |
| 11 August 2026 | Schiffman Glenn Director | Bought | 3,000 | $36.63 | $109,890 |
| 8 May 2026 | Brenner Melissa Anne Director | Sold | 5,141 | $35.94 | $184,768 |
| 6 March 2026 | Hosseini Hesam Chief Operating Officer | Sold | 59,013 | $30.13 | $2m |
| 20 November 2025 | Rascoff Spencer M Chief Executive Officer, Director | Bought | 14,000 | $31.84 | $445,760 |
From Form 4 filings: insiders must report trades in their own company's shares within two days.
Warning signs in its filings
Problems the company itself reported to the SEC, in its own words.
None of the warning signs we check for were found.
We look for five warning signs: doubt it can keep going, weak checks on its own accounts, a notice that its past accounts can't be relied on, a change of auditor, and one customer bringing in a big share of sales. We don't check lawsuits, investigations or debt yet.
We checked the auditor's report, internal controls, restatement notices, auditor changes and big customers in the 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, plus the 10-Q filed 5 Aug 2026 and 5 later 8-Ks.
A 10-K is the yearly report every US company files with the SEC. An 8-K is a short notice of a big event.
What could go wrong
- It owes more than it owns on paper (negative equity). Often that's from borrowing to buy back shares.
Whether the price already reflects the risks is what the deep dive is for.
What changed in the risks this year
Companies must list what could hurt them each year. These are the parts that changed since last year’s report.
we developed and made available via open source for improper purposes.
Could happenWe use open source software in connection with a portion of our operations and services and expect to continue to use open source software in the future. Under certain circumstances, some open source licenses require a user of the licensed code to provide the user’s own proprietary source code to third parties upon request, or prohibit a user from charging a fee to third parties in connection with the use of the user’s proprietary code. While we try to insulate our proprietary code from the effects of such open source license provisions, we cannot guarantee that we will be successful, that all open source software is reviewed prior to use, that our developers have not incorporated open source software into our operations or services, or that they will not do so in the future. Accordingly, we may face claims from others challenging our use of open source software, claiming ownership of, or seeking to enforce the license terms applicable to such open source software, including by demanding release of the open source software, derivative works or our proprietary source code that was developed or distributed with such software. Such claims could also require us to purchase a commercial license or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change our software, any of which would have a negative effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, if the license terms for the open source code change, we may be forced to re-engineer our software or incur additional costs. Additionally, the terms of many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts. There is a risk that open source software licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to conduct our operations or market or provide our services.
Read moreOur success depends, in part, on the integrity of third-party systems and infrastructure.
We rely on third parties, primarily data center and cloud-based, hosted web service providers, such as Amazon Web Services, as well as third party computer systems, service providers, software providers, and broadband and other communications systems, in connection with the provision of our services generally, as well as to facilitate and process certain transactions with our users, including to operate facial or liveness verification features at many of our brands. We have limited control over these third parties and their operations, and such third party systems are increasingly complex. Further, we have experienced outages by our service providers in the past, and expect to experience more outages in the future. As AI adoption increases, we are also seeing many existing service providers incorporate AI into their existing services via the rollout of new features, which may not have adequate AI governance processes or controls. Further, many AI service providers have limited operating histories and therefore often have unsophisticated systems and governance processes and are at increased risk of failure. Any (i) changes in service levels at our data centers or hosted web service providers, (ii) interruptions, outages, or delays in our systems or those of our third party providers, (iii) deterioration in the performance of these systems, (iv) cyber or similar attacks on these systems, (v) discontinuation of services, for example from a software provider, for which there is no readily available alternative or (v) need to migrate our business to different third-party data centers or hosted web service providers as a result of any such problems, could impair our ability to provide our services or process transactions with our users, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. For additional information, see “Item 1—Business—Dependencies on services provided by others— Cloud and Other Services.”
Read morefinancial results, and business may be significantly harmed.
Could happenIn addition, on February 22, 2026, Apple removed our Azar app from the Apple App Store following a February 6, 2026 update to Apple’s App Review Guidelines, meaning the app is no longer available for download from the Apple App Store. While we continue to evaluate potential modifications to Azar in order to potentially gain reinstatement to the Apple App Store, there can be no assurance that any efforts to apply for reinstatement will be successful. If we are not successful in having the Azar app reinstated to the Apple App Store, we expect there would be a decrease in the size of our user base over time, but we are uncertain how quickly this decrease would occur and to what extent we will be able to offset this decrease with increases of users from other sources, such as on Android or the desktop and mobile web versions of Azar. Further, the size of Azar’s user base may be adversely affected by the timing of our ability, if any, to gain reinstatement of Azar to the Apple App Store and the usefulness to users of any future version of the app that is able to gain reinstatement to the Apple App Store, if at all. Any of these impacts from the removal of the Azar app from the Apple App Store could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Read moreWe are subject to taxation related risks in multiple jurisdictions.
Could happenTax laws are being re-examined and evaluated globally. New laws and interpretations of the law are taken into account for financial statement purposes in the quarter or year that they become applicable. Tax authorities are increasingly scrutinizing the tax positions of companies. Many countries in the European Union, as well as a number of other countries and organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Commission, are actively considering changes to existing tax laws that, if enacted, could increase our tax obligations in countries where we do business. These proposals include changes to the existing framework to calculate income tax, as well as proposals to change or impose new types of non- income taxes, including taxes based on a percentage of revenue. If the U.S. or other foreign tax authorities change applicable tax laws, our overall taxes could increase, and our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely impacted.
Read morerisks in connection with certain of our international operations.
• difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, including as a result of differing laws relating to employee benefits and management;
The deep dive
Everything above is arithmetic on public filings. The deep dive reads the last ten years of annual reports, the proxy statements, and the earnings calls, then argues the case the way Buffett, Klarman, and Hohn would, and checks every claim against the source.
- What the business is worth, as a range, and the margin of safety at today’s price
- Prices to start buying, buy, and buy hard
- The three things that would make this a mistake
- Every number footnoted to the filing it came from
Your first deep dive is free.
Not advice. Numbers on this page come from SEC filings and are updated each night; prices are updated again after the US market closes. The five-year figures are rounded.